« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present  (Read 14849 times)

bizzy

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 616
  • Getbig!
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #50 on: May 07, 2008, 07:04:22 PM »
A lean faced Levrone (I believe @ the 92 NOC)
vs. heavier muscled versions.
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #51 on: May 07, 2008, 07:10:40 PM »
although ND will rant and scream like the little girl that he is, the fact is that Ronnie was much leaner in the face in 1999 than he was at the 2001 AC.

deal with it ND. :P

Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

bizzy

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 616
  • Getbig!
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #52 on: May 07, 2008, 07:25:54 PM »
There's been alot of good replies to this thread
and my suspicion was that the present faces had to do with
insulin or GH but I don't know that much about drugs and
it's good to hear people's opinions. It seems like insulin is the main factor
with GH being secondary and heavier muscle mass playing a partial role also.
I just remember the days when you could see Mike Quinn, Berry Demey,
Francis Benfatto and even Shawn Ray and know they were really shredded
by having as Hulkster put it: The skeleton face...
Logged

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #53 on: May 07, 2008, 08:42:32 PM »
Peter Andreas
Logged

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #54 on: May 07, 2008, 08:49:23 PM »
You guys are dense! Clearly the reason for the bloated faces on todays conditioned bodybuilders, is due to massive Synthol injections and the Synthol migrated to their heads! It's so simple.
Logged
a

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #55 on: May 07, 2008, 09:26:35 PM »
Sunken face right here :(






Logged

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #56 on: May 08, 2008, 07:37:36 AM »
Quote from: The Coach on May 07, 2008, 09:26:35 PM
Sunken face right here :(









Looking like a greek god right there Joe  8)
Logged

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #57 on: May 08, 2008, 07:41:46 AM »
 :P
Logged

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #58 on: May 08, 2008, 08:01:51 AM »
Quote from: BayGBM on May 08, 2008, 07:41:46 AM
:P

IMO, one of the best upper bodies ever, especially when standing relaxed.
Logged

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32176
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #59 on: May 08, 2008, 08:12:03 AM »
Quote from: The Coach on May 08, 2008, 08:01:51 AM
IMO, one of the best upper bodies ever, especially when standing relaxed.
NOT IN THAT PIC THOUGH MIDSECTION LOOKS ODD..
Logged

CT_Muscle

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2648
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #60 on: May 08, 2008, 08:44:29 AM »
Quote from: gh15 on May 07, 2008, 03:16:31 PM
we got a winner here,,bingo

insulin is the reason there is no detailed physiqes anymore,,INSULIN IS USED BY EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE GUYS WHO WALK AT 240 AND OVER WITH LOW BODYFAT% ON A PROFESSIONAL STAGE NOW DAYS

it is not the growth and it is not the aas,,it is the insulin and ONLY the insulin


by the way..how can heath ever win o with chest such as this? this is pathetic  and worse than many 180lb gym rats and no its not that the arms are killing the chest it is that there is NO CHEST,,stucturally he is out of the mr o title unless joseph wants him to be a mr o ,,therre shoud never be mr o with such a pathetic chest ,,the more i look at it the more im amazed since this fella is not 5'3 like priest he is 5'9 and got no chest ,,he is all arms shoulder when it comes to upper tors,,i dont know but if he wins o ever while dex competing that will be the end of bodybuilding justice as it will be killed a final death after jason disaster showing last year ,,its like god forgot to give him chest,,amazing

What about IGF-1?
Logged

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #61 on: May 08, 2008, 08:51:51 AM »
Logged

Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #62 on: May 08, 2008, 12:03:29 PM »
Quote from: njflex on May 08, 2008, 08:12:03 AM
NOT IN THAT PIC THOUGH MIDSECTION LOOKS ODD..

It's because he is flexing his abdominals and not his obliques.
Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #63 on: May 08, 2008, 12:24:01 PM »
Even when Levrone came in at 260 pounds in the mid-late 90's he still had a sunken face, as did 270 pound Yates. Bodyweight had nothing to do with it. They pretty much had NO water in their body, or at least a very depleted amount, thanks to good old diuretics.
Logged

honest

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3372
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #64 on: May 08, 2008, 12:24:16 PM »
Quote from: bizzy on May 07, 2008, 07:04:22 PM
A lean faced Levrone (I believe @ the 92 NOC)
vs. heavier muscled versions.


His shape at that show and the olympia where he came second to dorian were his all best time shapes, the insulin fucked him and the sport in my opinion.
Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #65 on: May 08, 2008, 12:25:18 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 07, 2008, 06:01:08 PM
Hulkster cried when Ronnie got married  :-X

Doesn't surprise me in the least bit. In fact, if he hadn't, I would have been shocked!   :D
Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #66 on: May 08, 2008, 12:26:38 PM »
Logged

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16997
  • "Don't Try"
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #67 on: May 08, 2008, 12:31:55 PM »
Logged

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #68 on: May 08, 2008, 12:43:58 PM »
Quote from: Van_Bilderass on May 08, 2008, 12:31:55 PM
Please elaborate

I never saw anybody get better gain when they added that thing to their usual stacks.

either the Igf-1 they were taking was fake or it doesn't work, but from what I read on the boards it really doesn't do much
Logged

McFarland

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7930
  • Tastes Like WINNING
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #69 on: May 08, 2008, 12:52:47 PM »
Quote from: Van_Bilderass on May 08, 2008, 12:31:55 PM
Please elaborate

I think he's saying it's shit, Van. 
Logged

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16997
  • "Don't Try"
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #70 on: May 08, 2008, 12:57:09 PM »
Quote from: Stavios on May 08, 2008, 12:43:58 PM
I never saw anybody get better gain when they added that thing to their usual stacks.

either the Igf-1 they were taking was fake or it doesn't work, but from what I read on the boards it really doesn't do much

That's pretty much what I've seen too. Maybe some fat loss. And lethargy.  :D

Quote from: McFarland on May 08, 2008, 12:52:47 PM
I think he's saying it's shit, Van. 

 :D What do you think about igf-1?
Logged

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71261
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #71 on: May 08, 2008, 01:00:35 PM »
Less food also,ie. much stricter/extreme diets with no cheat meals or cheat days like todays slobs.
Logged

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #72 on: May 08, 2008, 01:01:27 PM »
Quote from: wes on May 08, 2008, 01:00:35 PM
Less food also,ie. much stricter/extreme diets with no cheat meals or cheat days like todays slobs.

Tim laying the smackdown on the young fellas  ;D
Logged

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71261
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #73 on: May 08, 2008, 01:19:32 PM »
Damn right bro!!  LOL  :)
Logged

McFarland

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7930
  • Tastes Like WINNING
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #74 on: May 08, 2008, 01:25:19 PM »
Quote from: Van_Bilderass on May 08, 2008, 12:57:09 PM

That's pretty much what I've seen too. Maybe some fat loss. And lethargy.  :D

 :D What do you think about igf-1?

Well the only people I've ever seen talking it up are the ones selling it for starters...also, I've never heard of IGF-1 being held responsible for any of the physiques I've ever admired.  Actually, I've never even heard of it being responsible for anything anyone's ever done in particular, have you?  Just alot of people talking about what it could do, if it's real, if you mix it/preserve it/shoot it right...just a bunch of b.s. if you ask me.   
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »