Debussey, it's just that Matt has a bad habbit of bringing up his cited points in topics that have nothing to do with jews, or intelligence related to ethnic background. It's very annoying incase you haven't noticed.
We all have certain opinions which are based on readings. A lot of us would concur with Matt's points, but wouldn't go about annoying others with those point every single fucking chance we got. We wouldn't be trolling random threads with that stuff in attempts to hijack.
And, um, those views aren't even his own. Woten influenced him greatly and he adopted his views. It's comical because he's desperately trying to copy Woten in every single post he makes, but he doesn't have Woten's wit or originality.
1: Debussey agrees that he has overdone it a bit and that he has "forced" his points on other people to a certain degree, but the core of his points are not racist. Debussey finds the "strawman" attacks on MattCock to be annoying as well, because they are not based on a rational approach, it's based on denial and refusal to explore the research properly before making an informed opinion.
2: Wooten did not "force" these beliefs on him. He simply made MattCock aware of the research, MattCock studied the research and then he formed new informed opinions.
Actually, 95% of our opinions are not "our own", they are all based upon other references. The more true to science an opinion is, in general, the better it is (at least in matters such as this). The real degree of "own-ness" must be how well the opinion = based on realistic/sound references. Many people here form their opinions about race and intelligence based upon nothing but air
does mattcock have ANY origionality? 
Probably, but not in matters like this where there should be none. You can't have original ideas regarding stuff like 2 + 2 = 4 or how the cells in the human body are made. You can have original ideas BASED on those premises, but not "original ideas" that contradicts them. The same holds true here.
