Author Topic: BREAKING: Amanda Savell's family announces plans to SUE Jacobs' family  (Read 14183 times)

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
how can they sue their family. what does jacobs family have to do with him murdering her?  ::)


Nothing.  That's why this has people pissed off.
Ron: "I am lazy."

Zaphod

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1751
  • IFBB Mr Canada 1970
are you retarded kid?  his family isn't going to be sued.

Tell that to the Goldmans.

Moosejay

  • Guest
Single guys in his line of work almost never have life insurance.  

I pay:

Homeowner's
Car
Health
Business liability
Malpractice
Disability
Long term health care (for parents) insurances

I don't have life insurance. No dependents, so its not necessary.

If you have dependents, then you are nuts not to have some.

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17458
  • MAGA

Nothing.  That's why this has people pissed off.
haha ok.

some bright people in the Savell family huh

Campeon Del Mundo

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 393
  • Getbig!

Damn straight it does!  She just lost her daughter and the stupid bitch wants to cash in by suing another family who also just lost someone.  >:(


This will get laughed out of court...  Dave Jocob's family didn't kill her, Dave did.


exactly, the case has no merit at all..

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
I pay:

Homeowner's
Car
Health
Business liability
Malpractice
Disability
Long term health care (for parents) insurances

I don't have life insurance. No dependents, so its not necessary.

If you have dependents, then you are nuts not to have some.

you're a chiropractor.

dave jacobs was a snitch drug dealer.

Moosejay

  • Guest
you're a chiropractor.

dave jacobs was a snitch drug dealer.

I know...but someone posted that guys in his position usually don't have any....I interpreted that as same as guys who are single....didn't calculate his misdeeds...so sorry :-[!

Zaphod

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1751
  • IFBB Mr Canada 1970
you're a chiropractor.

dave jacobs was a snitch drug dealer.

How do you feel about the second amendment now, 240? Looks like Coach isn't the only one with blood on his hands.

drkaje

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18182
  • Quiet, Err. I'm transmitting rage.
How do you feel about the second amendment now, 240? Looks like Coach isn't the only one with blood on his hands.

He would have probably just killed her in another manner.

Zaphod

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1751
  • IFBB Mr Canada 1970
He would have probably just killed her in another manner.

Lat machine pull down cale to failure, WWF style?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
How do you feel about the second amendment now, 240? Looks like Coach isn't the only one with blood on his hands.

I believe that LAW-ABIDING people should have guns.  Felons should not.  Dave jacobs was a felon, and had an illegal gun in the house.  You could ban guns, but is seems Mr Jacobs wouldn't have listened.

He was dealing drug again and using.  He was back to being jacked.  The feds found a big pile of coke, weed, and gear there, along with the guns.

The girl was sleeping in a house full of coke, weed, and illegal guns.

It's a sad situation, but I don't know how innocent anyone was in this case.  She knew what he was - a drug dealer who ratted on other drug dealers.  She knew he had death threats.  She knew he as a violent man, and knew that he had tlaked about suicide before.  She knew the score, and stayed, despite the pleas of many friends.

Guns aren't to blame here.  If he was intent on killing her, a hammer or knife or dumbbell could have been a murder weapon just as easily.  Problem here was the angry criminal, not the gun.

Croatch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
  • Man up, train natural.
By federal law, there is no way Jacobs should have had 2 guns sitting around - a .22 and a .40 cal, if I remember reading correctly.  They took his guns when they busted him, and it was very illegal for him to own one.

Already, she was sitting in a house with obviously illegal guns, along with a pile of weed, coke, and whatever else they brought out.  


ALL CLASS ;)
N

YoungBlood

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6777
  • Weee!

It's a sad situation, but I don't know how innocent anyone was in this case.  She knew what he was - a drug dealer who ratted on other drug dealers.  She knew he had death threats.  She knew he as a violent man, and knew that he had tlaked about suicide before.  She knew the score, and stayed, despite the pleas of many friends.

In no way did she deserve to die. She didn't do herself any favors by getting back together with him, especially after she knew he was arrested and was (about) turning on people. I hear far too many people calling DJ a rat/snitch and what not, but I'm sure they would do the exact same thing if they were in his shoes (rat people out, not kill)...but I digress.
For whatever reason she felt it OK to stay with DJ, it could have been the worst choice she made. Perhaps she decided to move on and the end result we are now reading about.

Quote
Problem here was the angry criminal, not the gun.

True, to a point...

Deedee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5067
  • They sicken of the calm, who knew the storm.
The motivation to sue isn't necessarily one of greed.  It has something to do with the Son of Sam statutes that prevents criminals and their beneficiaries from profiting from their crime.  So if the Jacobs' family wanted to write a book, publish personal photographs, collaborate on an hbo movie special etc... they couldn't keep the money. Under the statutes, the liability does extend to family members, I think. In high profile cases it's done as an effort to retain dignity for the victim. 

drkaje

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18182
  • Quiet, Err. I'm transmitting rage.
Lat machine pull down cale to failure, WWF style?

I was thinking TapOut.

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17458
  • MAGA
I believe that LAW-ABIDING people should have guns.  Felons should not.  Dave jacobs was a felon, and had an illegal gun in the house.  You could ban guns, but is seems Mr Jacobs wouldn't have listened.

He was dealing drug again and using.  He was back to being jacked.  The feds found a big pile of coke, weed, and gear there, along with the guns.

The girl was sleeping in a house full of coke, weed, and illegal guns.

It's a sad situation, but I don't know how innocent anyone was in this case.  She knew what he was - a drug dealer who ratted on other drug dealers.  She knew he had death threats.  She knew he as a violent man, and knew that he had tlaked about suicide before.  She knew the score, and stayed, despite the pleas of many friends.

Guns aren't to blame here.  If he was intent on killing her, a hammer or knife or dumbbell could have been a murder weapon just as easily.  Problem here was the angry criminal, not the gun.
if guns are not to blame for murder, then explain how canada with their strict gun laws has like 1% of the murder rate that america has

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
if guns are not to blame for murder, then explain how america has 99% higher murder rate than say your neighbour land Canada with strict gun laws?

many more factors in play. 

Population dispersement, education, poverty, healthcare, for starters.

You put a large group of poor, uneducated canadians with no health insurance into the projects, insert drugs into the equation, and see if they don't start hitting each other with sacks of doorknobs.

Plus, don't 75%+ of canadians smoke pot everyday?  you guys are a peaceful lot.

Stormcloud

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 113
Another news reporter screwing up a story.

They are sueing the estate of David Jacobs. Not his dad.


MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17458
  • MAGA
many more factors in play. 

Population dispersement, education, poverty, healthcare, for starters.

You put a large group of poor, uneducated canadians with no health insurance into the projects, insert drugs into the equation, and see if they don't start hitting each other with sacks of doorknobs.

Plus, don't 75%+ of canadians smoke pot everyday?  you guys are a peaceful lot.

take quote from what i edited i wrote wrong :S

Zaphod

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1751
  • IFBB Mr Canada 1970
Another news reporter screwing up a story.

They are sueing the estate of David Jacobs. Not his dad.



Tell that to the Goldmans

CQ

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7018
  • TGT
LINK

Quote
Earhart said she was hurt by some media reports that implied that her daughter was a bodybuilder. Earhart said that symmetry and beauty are important in figure competitions so "she wouldn't need to take steroids," because the drugs would have made her too big and bulky.

Either the press is twisting things, or a spokesperson might be an idea here. Things are not coming across well.

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
this lawsuit business does nothing but tarnish the girls memory

pathetic

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17458
  • MAGA
LINK

Either the press is twisting things, or a spokesperson might be an idea here. Things are not coming across well.

what do you mean?

Zaphod

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1751
  • IFBB Mr Canada 1970
I still don't understand why they would sue his family? They didn't kill her!

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21287
I still don't understand why they would sue his family? They didn't kill her!

Money accelerates healing.