Not at all... actually quite the opposite. However, I have an inkling that chiropractors that don't have chronic patients, don't read there own images, and work together with MDs (not for but together), actually may be quite effective.
What do you mean dont read their own images?? As far as DC's working together with MD's....that will happen once MD's come around to accepting our practice. As an example of a patient JUST THE PAST WEEK who has had ringing in her ears for the last SIX MONTHS:
Patient (to her MD) : I would like to try chiropractic care
MD: I suppose, but I cant see how it will help
Patient: Why do you not think it will help
MD: There is no proof it helps. I think that you would be better off continuing with the Soma and possibly increasing your intake of ibuprofen.
Lets see...hmmm....as of today she has SIGNIFICANT less ringing in her ears. I am not saying that chiropractic is the be-all, end-all.....but why is it so bad to give it a try as a conservative, non-invasive approach??
Can you post some kind of proof of your 135k patients? I'd love to see it.
Hmmm....let see....for me...8yrs in practice....average about 300 - 350 patient visits per week. Proof? Not ONE case of stroke against me. Being that this is a VERY litigious (sp?) society....can you possibly think that if someone DID have a stroke I wouldnt be up to my ass in a lawsuit?