Author Topic: Ending the cardio debate  (Read 19230 times)

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #75 on: June 27, 2008, 08:39:53 PM »
He's talking about this http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=220625.0

I agree with coach actually, I think HIIT cardio is great, but I dont think he reads my post, or he's just so into himself that he has to be right and everything else is wrong.

All I was saying was, neither one is better than the other IMHO. Both have their places. For the average joe trying to lose fat or a bb on a mod-high carb diet, I'd recommend HIIT.

BUT! for a bodybuilder on a keto diet ( which is so popular nowadays) IMO its no question that long duration low intensity cardio is better.

But Coach seems to think that a person who isnt going to eat carbs for 4 months is going to benefit doing exercise that mainly looks for glycogen for energy. But what do I know. I only have a BS in Kinesiology and Health, personal trained clients with success doing both methods and have gone to numerous seminars from staley to lowry to thibadeau and many others. Fuck what do i know.

Ok, here's the thing. I'm hearing all this bs about not being able to do HIIT on a keto diet, etc,etc,etc. Ok, now lets talk some reality about bbing (pro, top national competitor, you know what I'm getting at). 1. Most are rarely low carb simply because they need carbs for the insulin use so not doing High Intensity intervals is an excuse not to do the extra except to down a few more cytomel and eca.

Now, lets take the "natural" bodybuilder. Even though he/she will be on a low carb diet, there is NO problem what so ever about taking in pre and post workout carbs during this time of training, as a matter of fact, because of the extra energy (carbs) taken in during pre and post workout and since HIIT will burn up to 15-20% more AFTER work out, it only makes sense that HIIT is to be done. It's about fat burning and muscle retention, not fat loss and muscle loss.

One of the problems is these CASE STUDIES are done with athetes and VERY few are done with bodybuilders. And educated guess would tell me scientists don't want to have a study with someone who take a drug for every phase of his training also they are seriously not considered athletes.

bigmikecox

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14367
  • SAY MY NAME!!!!
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #76 on: June 27, 2008, 08:41:07 PM »
Have you ever noticed the ultra-lean, heavily muscled physiques of sprint type athletes (100m runners, running backs, speed skaters) and wondered why your training hasn't produced such a result? After all, you train with weights 3-5x per week to build muscle. And you do a couple of moderate intensity cardio workouts to burn fat. So why don't you look better than these athletes? All they do is spend the bulk of their time running around a track. So why are their pecs, arms, and abs better defined than yours?

Well, there are a few answers to these questions. The first answer is, as you might have suspected, genetics. While many athletes would have you believe that their hours of hard training have made them into the athlete that they are today, the truth is that they did get a kick start from their chromosomes. You see, successful athletes are born with great potential for their sport. Then, while playing, as a kid, they began to self-select certain sports that they are good at. Add in a solid training regimen and their inherent potential shines.

But there's another side to the question. Although these athletes are born with an advantage, one that allows them to develop muscle and burn fat more easily than most, we can't underestimate the importance of their hard training. By targeting the muscle fibers that contribute to explosive power as well as training the anaerobic energy systems (ATP-PC system and glycolytic system), these athletes can't help but get bigger, stronger, and leaner. And if you apply the tricks I'm going to teach you in parts 1 and 2 of this article, you'll get bigger, stronger, and leaner too.

The Anaerobic Energy Systems

First, let's define our terms. If you're familiar with the term "aerobic", you'll know that it means "with oxygen". Therefore, aerobic energy systems are systems in the body in which energy (ATP) is generated from the consumption of oxygen. Simple enough.

Now, the opposite of "aerobic" is "anaerobic" which, by definition, means "without oxygen". Therefore, anaerobic energy systems are systems in the body in which energy (ATP) is generated from non-oxidative sources. Now this is where it gets hairy.

From the aforementioned definitions it would appear that these two energy systems were mutually exclusive; only one is active at a time. And in fact, once upon a time, in a land far, far away, researchers believed that no oxygen was used to make ATP during anaerobic exercise. Thus the name. However, current research shows that even during the most "anaerobic" of events, the aerobic system (with oxygen) is also activated (to a small extent).

With that said, it's important to realize what determines the ability of the body to go "with" or "without" oxygen. Well, the main two determinants are intensity and duration. Here's an illustration of these variables in action.

As I'm sure that you all know, if you're on the track and you start to run really fast, for the first few seconds you'll feel quite explosive. But after just 3-10 seconds, some of that explosiveness will subside and you'll slow down a bit. Still pushing hard though, yet getting progressively slower, about 15-20 seconds into the run, your muscles will begin to burn and you'll have to slow down even more. Finally, due to the burning and fatigue, you'll either have to work your way down to a slow paced jog or you'll have to stop altogether. Why does this occur, you might ask? Well, check out the following chart:

Anaerobic System

Time To: ATP-PC Glycolytic Aerobic System
Peak Power/System <1sec. 20sec. 2-3min.
Maintenance of Peak 10sec. 20sec. 3min.
Total Capacity  10-30sec. 1-2min. hours
Full Time For Recovery 3min. 1-2hr. 24hr.-48hr.
½ Time For Recovery 30sec. 15-20min. 5-6hr.

So what's the chart mean? Well, in it you'll find the actual values for the duration of each energy system (assuming that you work within the appropriate intensity domain). Now, I want you to notice something very specific in the chart above. If you're perceptive you'll have realized that I've not only listed the differences between the anaerobic systems and the aerobic systems, but I've also listed two types of anaerobic systems; ATP-PC and glycolytic. Let me explain the difference between the two.

The ATP-PC system is so-called because the provision of energy at very high intensities is dependent only on stored ATP already in the muscles and on the ability of the muscle's very limited amount of phosphocreatine (PC) to regenerate the ATP as it gets used up. Since these stores are limited, as you might imagine, as the ATP and the PC become depleted, the body has to slow down. Therefore, as you can see in the chart, this system has only a limited ability to generate ATP as the peak power of the system occurs at the 1-second mark and the system only has a capacity of 30 seconds. However, the rate of ATP generation is the fastest of the three and that's why this system is so important for high intensity exercise. When using the ATP-PC anaerobic energy system, you can generate a lot of power for a very short period of time. A 100m sprint is run within the ATP-PC domain.

The Glycolytic anaerobic energy system is so-called because the provision of energy from this system is dependent on muscle glycogen (carbohydrate stores). As you can see in the chart, the glycolytic system provides ATP generating power for longer than the ATP-PC system but it's ability to sustain high intensity exercise is also limited in that the total capacity of this system is 2 minutes.

So the bottom line is that in order to generate power during high intensity exercise, the anaerobic energy system first utilizes stored ATP, then PC, and then muscle glycogen. Well, hold on though! In looking at the substrates used during anaerobic work (ATP, PC, glycogen) you'll notice that fat is mysteriously missing from the list. Does that mean that I'm spending all this time writing about a form of exercise that burns no fat? No way! Listen up.

The interesting thing with anaerobic training is that although very little fat is burned during the short, high intensity efforts, quite a bit of fat is burned in the recovery time between efforts. Therefore by effectively training the anaerobic system (via interval workouts), you'll be dropping large amounts of fat as well.

The Benefits of Training The Anaerobic Energy Systems

While training the anaerobic energy systems is clearly be of benefit for enhancing athletic performance, there are many other non-athletic benefits as well:

1) This type of training is very calorie expensive. Short, 30-minute workouts can burn in excess of 400kcal during the exercise. While carbohydrates provide much of the fuel used during the high intensity interval, fat is also burned preferentially during the low intensity aerobic recovery period between the high intensity intervals.

2) The post exercise calorie expenditure is huge with this type of exercise. In some studies the resting metabolic rate remains elevated (by 15% or more) up to 24 hours after the workout. Interestingly, after exercise the body preferentially burns fat so this elevated metabolism is burning predominantly fat.

3) This exercise leads to an up regulation of aerobic, anaerobic, and ATP-PC enzyme activity. This means that all the energy systems of the body will operate at higher levels and become efficient at burning calories and generating energy.

4) The muscles used during this type of exercise will change their composition, shifting toward an increased percentage of fast twitch fibers. This increase in power-producing fast fibers comes at the expense of the weaker slow twitch ones. The shift is desired as the fast fibers grow more easily than the slow fibers.

5) There is an increase in specific muscle cell organelles (i.e. the sarcoplasmic reticulum). This leads to a better calcium balance and contractile ability.

6) There are short-lived increases in blood testosterone (38%) and growth hormone concentrations immediately after exercise. While this is debatable, these changes may contribute to an anabolic state in the body.


So What Are We Waiting For?

For the optimal application of anaerobic training in order to improve body composition, here is a model that I've found particularly successful. I have also used this program for off-season conditioning in my athletes.

Day 1 - 1.5 hours of Resistance Training (Upper Body - Pushing Type Exercises)
Day 2 - *30 minutes of Anaerobic Interval Training (Rowing)
Day 3 - 1.5 hours of Resistance Training (Lower Body)
Day 4 - *30 minutes of Anaerobic Interval Training (Cycling)
Day 5 - 1.5 hours of Resistance Training (Upper Body - Pulling Type Execises)
Day 6 - *30 minutes of Anaerobic Interval Training (Running)
Day 7 - Rest

*The anaerobic training activities are varied in order to activate different muscles from one workout to the next.

In structuring your interval days, here are some suggestions.

1) Before beginning such a program, be sure to experiment with high intensity exercise. If you have never tried such exercise before, you are in for a surprise - it's difficult.

2) Use a 1:3 ratio of exercise to recovery (i.e. for every 1 second you sprint, rest for 3 seconds).

3) To maximally activate your anaerobic glycolytic system, your exercise duration should be 30s to 60s. As a result your recovery will be between 90s and 180s.

4) Intensity is key to the success of this program. If your intensity is too low during the exercise, you will not realize the full training adaptation. If intensity is too high, you won't be able to complete the workout. You'll have to play around with the intensity until you get it right.

5) Your exercise intensity should be more than double that of your recovery intensity for 60s bouts and more than triple for 30s bouts. For example, if running at 11mph for 60s during your exercise interval, you should be running at approximately 5.5 mph for 180s during your recovery interval. Likewise if you're cycling at 350 watts for 30s during your exercise interval, your recovery should be at about 100 watts for 90s during your recovery interval.

6) When increasing the intensity from one workout to the next, be sure to increase the work. Do not increase the exercise duration or decrease the duration of the recovery. If the exercise to recovery ratio drops below 1:3, you'll lose power during your exercise interval and the activity becomes more aerobic.

Here is an example of these rules in action from one of my client records.

Day 2 - Rowing
5-minute warm-up followed by 7 sets of the following:
60 seconds at 250 watts*
180 seconds at 125 watts

Day 4 - Cycling
5-minute warm-up followed by 15 sets of the following:
30 seconds at 300 watts (level 12)*
90 seconds at 100 watts (level 2)

Day 6 - Running
5-minute warm-up followed by 7 sets of the following:
60 seconds at 11mph*
180 seconds at 5.5 mph

*If it's easy to maintain the same workout output for the full 30 minutes, increase the work (watts or speed) for the next workout. Increase the intensity to the point that it becomes difficult to complete all the sets at the prescribed intensity. Just like with resistance training, use progressive overload to continually improve.

So there you have it. A new model for improving body composition that's very effective and doesn't involve boring hours of your life spent on the cardio equipment. Give this program a try and the next time you're admiring the physique of a well-trained anaerobic athlete, it may be your own.


http://www.johnberardi.com/articles/training/gettinginshape.htm

Can I get the cliff notes for this ???

Brutal_1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7134
  • Your best is...
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #77 on: June 27, 2008, 08:42:44 PM »
Can I get the cliff notes for this ???

cardio good...Fast Food bad

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
just not good enough

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #78 on: June 27, 2008, 08:57:01 PM »

One of the problems is these CASE STUDIES are done with athetes and VERY few are done with bodybuilders.
  :D

alejandro_torres

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2061
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #79 on: June 27, 2008, 08:57:46 PM »
  :D

be happy

grow fat 


long live winteeeeeeeer!!!!!!

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #80 on: June 27, 2008, 08:59:38 PM »
be happy

grow fat 


long live winteeeeeeeer!!!!!!
  southern hemisphere = backwards  :P

alejandro_torres

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2061
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #81 on: June 27, 2008, 09:01:02 PM »
  southern hemisphere = backwards  :P

we still got hotter girls...

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #82 on: June 27, 2008, 09:02:09 PM »
we still got hotter girls...
  true; no debate there

alejandro_torres

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2061
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #83 on: June 27, 2008, 09:02:58 PM »

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #84 on: June 27, 2008, 09:22:04 PM »
Can I get the cliff notes for this ???

Run fast for a short time, stop, repeat.


Hope this helps ;D

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #85 on: June 27, 2008, 09:36:08 PM »
Precisely, all this is rehash of decades ago when i first read it. As far as the sprinter analogy, it makes total sense for lifting. As far as cardio, it's apples and oranges as to which approach is "better", they both have pros and cons. The most important thing isn't a debate as to which is supposedly better rather it's which one (or both in combo) appeals most to use over the long-term.



This may help answer your question;


http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/25/10/1729


Low intensity for some is high intensity for others.

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #86 on: June 27, 2008, 10:22:16 PM »
yea very true. I think bodybuilders not on a keto diet......Like the mod-high carb diets do well with a mixture of HIIT and low intensity cardio like if they are doing four sessions a week, three low intensity sessions and one HIIT sessions works very well. I know Layme Norton does this with his guys, and a few others prep guys do as well, and it really seems to work wonders.

I see what you are saying, I really do. But by todays standards, again, most of the pro and higher national caliber bbers are using insulin which requires carbs.

It's like saying a true test of strength isn't with the person using steriods but rather the person who is not. Make sense?

Samourai Pizzacat

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2019
  • Meeoow!!
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #87 on: June 27, 2008, 11:31:50 PM »
Most 100 M sprinters have just about twice the body mass of a speed skater


how come? remember this guy? got caught few weeks ago: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwain_Chambers

Max_Rep

  • Max Rep
  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3980
  • It’s about how hard you can GET hit...
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #88 on: June 28, 2008, 12:07:25 AM »
and keep moving!

marcus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3021
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #89 on: June 28, 2008, 12:38:44 AM »
Just tried HIIT, was a bitch but oddly fun. Is it something that can be done every day or should it only be done a few times a week?

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #90 on: June 28, 2008, 12:43:15 AM »
3-5 times per week 20-30mins each session.How did you do it?

marcus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3021
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #91 on: June 28, 2008, 12:46:38 AM »
Didn't research it too much before doing it so I'm not sure I did it right but I did 3 minutes moderate pace on the bike then 1 minute hard as I could and repeated until I had been on for 20 minutes.

IronForever

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 159
  • HULK SMASH!
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #92 on: June 28, 2008, 12:58:56 AM »
we still got hotter girls...
I beg to differ for the southern girls lol

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #93 on: June 28, 2008, 09:19:04 AM »
Great article coach...however I would like to add that the reason they look so good and ripped has greatly to dowith the fatburners they use and growth...

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #94 on: June 28, 2008, 09:52:10 AM »
Great article coach...however I would like to add that the reason they look so good and ripped has greatly to dowith the fatburners they use and growth...

Understood, but the same arguement could be made for any athlete. Since fat burners or any stimulant are considered performance enhancing and more easy to detect than AAS MOST are not going to take that risk.

Ursus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11338
  • Getbig!
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #95 on: June 28, 2008, 10:06:32 AM »
they nbench squat dead power snatch etc. big but also lean. seen a series on sprinters, jon drummond, atol boldon, maurice green, sum others.

also duane ladejo deadlifted 300kg

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #96 on: June 28, 2008, 10:27:11 AM »
Understood, but the same arguement could be made for any athlete. Since fat burners or any stimulant are considered performance enhancing and more easy to detect than AAS MOST are not going to take that risk.
As far as I know , there's a wide spread useof clen, ephedra and strenght/cutting drugs such as stanozolol/winny , trenbolone, etc etc...growth is also very popular .I', talking here about short distance runners. Also they do pay attention to their diets....however , there's so much owed to genetics

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #97 on: June 28, 2008, 10:28:12 AM »
they nbench squat dead power snatch etc. big but also lean. seen a series on sprinters, jon drummond, atol boldon, maurice green, sum others.

also duane ladejo deadlifted 300kg
One of the reasons Ben Johnson revolutionized the 100m race with that explosive start were deads.

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #98 on: June 28, 2008, 10:41:31 AM »
they nbench squat dead power snatch etc. big but also lean. seen a series on sprinters, jon drummond, atol boldon, maurice green, sum others.

also duane ladejo deadlifted 300kg

Yes, since speed starts in the gym, their resistance training is just almost as important as the running. If you look at an athletes training program, it is essentially energy system training. Weights (explosive) one day or morning session and track work in the afternoon or evening. Of course programs vary but it's all energy system.

Also, the sprint work. Usually sprint the distance 200m, 400m whatever it is, rest for usually 5min. When we do speed work for football for example and depending on the position, it's sprint end zone to end zone, rest 5 min, they will do that 10x's. Again, intervals.

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Ending the cardio debate
« Reply #99 on: June 28, 2008, 10:42:15 AM »
One of the reasons Ben Johnson revolutionized the 100m race with that explosive start were deads.

Exactly......speed starts in the gym.