His entire body was visibly smaller at the 2001 ASC than at the 1999 Olympia. And don't bring up the argument of how Ronnie had as much or more more mass at the 2001 ASC than at the 1999 Olympia, because that has been put to rest by yours truly. Or to quote someone who doesen't like me much, I gave you the "most clear cut ownage" in Getbig.com message board's history regarding this issue.
ha ha ha, where to start? First of all, Ronnie didn't look smaller all over than at the 99 Olympia. His legs? Yes, but his arms, delts, pecs, and lats looked the same size. Second, I already put to rest your argument that Ronnie lost 10 lbs of muscle from 99-01. Only a moron would claim that the best bodybuilder in the world (and all-time, might I add) doesn't know what the f*ck he's doing and actually lose muscle in 2 yrs. Third, you have yet to own me in anything. All you're good for is a few laughs at your expense - nothing more.
You seem to be unable to comprehend that what improved in Ronnie from the 1999 Olympia to the 2001 ASC was the fact that his waist and gut got smaller, as well as the fact that he gained a hard look he lacked in 1999. In other words, it was his overral package and not his back that improved. You can improve your overral package while simultaneously having a bodypart remain unchanged or get worse.
name one other bodybuider in history who became harder and more defined while their back looked the same or worse.
The key word is "look". Yes, it looks just as wide because his waist was smaller. It's very simple, really: his lats got smaller, but his waist also got smaller, so his taper and the illusion of width remained unchanged.
again, maybe you're susceptible to illusions hence why you feel the need to write off Ronnie's lat width as the product of an optical illusion. I'm looking at the same pics as you and clearly see that Ronnie was just as wide as Dorian.
You need to prove that the judges would take into consideration acne to decide which back was better. And this is irrelevant anyway, because Dorian in his 1995 version did not have acne in his back.
I don't need to prove anything. We're not discussing which physique would win in a contest. Moreover, 95 Dorian still had ugly skin folds which detracted from his look.