Ok, he has not printed this twice in MD:
deca 300-600 x 6-8 weeks
anavar 20-40 mg x 6-8 weeks
so if everyone is against a no test cycle, why would one of the better steroid gurus recommend these cycles, twice, in a national magazine? what is soo bad about the deca? if used proper PCT, shut down can be minimized... so why is it really THAT BAD to use these cycles? I know about deca dick, etc, but can someone exlpain why everyone hates these cycles?
?
Not to re-open an old discussion, but is Dave Palumbo that guy you want to be depending on for AAS advice?
Remember now, there is an old thread here dedicated to his poor physique entitled "
Palumboism".
Kovacs suffers from the same condition.
Granted there are going to be a few lucky bastards who can run Deca sans Test without any suppression, but most people I know would never survive a Deca/Anavar cycle unless they were abstinent or single.
Even if you were to run Deca without Test, why choose a weak anabolic like Anavar?
Winstrol would be the ideal choice there.
I'm getting tired of these Palumbo threads.....
Just because the guy has a column in MD doesn't mean you should take everything he says as gospel.
This is the same guy who got popped for selling fake GH kits.
Smart guy, huh?

DIV