Right, what I suggested you was doing is attempting to censor critical discussion of islam without bringing EVERY other religion into play to make it non-hypocritical.
What a friggin retard. You cannot read my friend! If you could the lameass shit you just posted would make you hit the backspace key until you got to the beginning of your message. You're telling me that I'm "censoring critical discusion" by bringing in all other religions?
You tried LIMITING my arguments by stubbornly inviting me to focus only on Islam. I DID NOT force you to talk about all religions. You did so yourself, making some really dumb observations in the process. So if you say that my "forcing" you to talk about all other religions is a form of censorship then you pretty much full of shit, because you did so yourself. If you keep insisting it is, then you'd be admitting that I've got veto power over your brain. And I'm sure you have something to say about that.
You're going off at a strange tangent now having been forced into a corner.
Another lameass stupid remark based on nothing and for which you present no examples, no data, nothing. Half of your discourse is baseless shitloads of verbal ego with no content behind it whatsoever.
It's simply not hypocritical to discuss islam void of the criticism of any other religion.
And how is it not hypocritical? I mean, half of the Islamic world is ruled by thugs we've helped into power, their countries invaded and humiliated over and over by the US, Russia and the UK, so is it any wander a good part of political Islam has radicalized itself? Who are we, westerners, to discuss negatively or criticize a group of people (and their beliefs) for their behaviour when our governments have actively (and us passively) been a major contributor to the worsening of the behaviour itself? There's only one pedestal from which you can safely and morally stand (in the west) criticising that which you're partly to blame: HYPOCHRISY!
You can compare other religions, but don't bitch and moan like you have in this thread when everyone turns round with the general notion that comparing the Christianity of 700 years ago isn't valid when criticising the islam of today.
It isn't valid because you say so and expect me to take it as fact (as usual) or because you do not want to hear it?
You're saying Nazism is the Christian comparison of Islamism? If so, that's absolutely fallacious.
No! I believe you were making a comparison between the Islam and Christianity of today, which, of course, in historic terms would be an inaccurate thing to do as WE'RE bombing the shit out of their countries, while Christian states are not even under any attacks. I'd like to see the reaction in the Christian states when a Muslim superpower repeatedly bombs, invades, attacks, humiliates and puts "puppets" in power in various Christian states. I'd like to hear what you'd be spewing out then. In any case, Christianity has shown, over and over and over and many times over its potential for intolerance, and one must not go that far back to find some of that intolerance, that's where my comments about the Nazis & Christianity come in and you've taken out of context... because you cannot read!
