Author Topic: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.  (Read 21080 times)

Nordic Superman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
  • Hesitation doesn't come easily in this blood...
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #150 on: August 31, 2008, 07:58:38 AM »
No one is saying this.Its not true because some science tags a date on it in the millions, carbon dating? sorry bro they don't use thois method on dinosaurs, they only use geolical column made by man, and everyone knows that dating methods aren't accurate. Bottom line is we lived with dinosaurs and the only reason you find this silly is because you have been taght differently since kindergarden.

Dinosaurs NEVER lived in any era even CLOSE to human beings. I find people thinking otherwise disturbing.

The dating methods are accurate, they don't provide resolution down to days, weeks etc but give an amazing accuracy in a range up to 60K years.

Carbon isotopes are the best methods for date ranges scientists most frequently use (< 60K years). The isotopes of other elements are better suited for different age ranges.

Here's some literature:
 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating

Info about other isotopes and their applications:
 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmogenic_isotope#Applications_in_geology_listed_by_isotope
الاسلام هو شيطانية

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #151 on: August 31, 2008, 09:42:03 AM »
I find people like you disturbing, people who are so gullable that they here numbers in the millions and believe, millions, use your head.

Nordic Superman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
  • Hesitation doesn't come easily in this blood...
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #152 on: August 31, 2008, 10:25:52 AM »
I find people like you disturbing, people who are so gullable that they here numbers in the millions and believe, millions, use your head.

Seriously, are you a gimmick? ??? :o

Gullibility to me is subscribing the the religions of Abrahamic ancestry written 200 years ago with no evidence of divinity past the assertions of men.
الاسلام هو شيطانية

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #153 on: August 31, 2008, 10:35:06 AM »
Seriously, are you a gimmick? ??? :o

Gullibility to me is subscribing the the religions of Abrahamic ancestry written 200 years ago with no evidence of divinity past the assertions of men.
200 years ago, thats why the dead sea scrolls are nearly 2000 years old. You atheist are all alike you say stuff like "oh brother" are you a gimmick? If you do your research the majoritry of planet believes in a creator of some sort, we all must be gimmicks and you have all have  the answere, stupid ones that aren't observable because they happen in fairy tale land a quadrillion years ago

Nordic Superman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
  • Hesitation doesn't come easily in this blood...
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #154 on: August 31, 2008, 10:58:43 AM »
200 years ago, thats why the dead sea scrolls are nearly 2000 years old. You atheist are all alike you say stuff like "oh brother" are you a gimmick? If you do your research the majoritry of planet believes in a creator of some sort, we all must be gimmicks and you have all have  the answere, stupid ones that aren't observable because they happen in fairy tale land a quadrillion years ago

Sorry, I did mean 2000 years.

Science has proved things that the majority of people believed true 100 years ago, to be false. The number of people believing in a lie doesn't make the lie truth, it does give the lie massive inertia tho.

Fairy tale land... oh the irony!
الاسلام هو شيطانية

big L dawg

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5729
  • i always tell the truth even when i lie...
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #155 on: August 31, 2008, 11:27:30 AM »
200 years ago, thats why the dead sea scrolls are nearly 2000 years old. You atheist are all alike you say stuff like "oh brother" are you a gimmick? If you do your research the majoritry of planet believes in a creator of some sort, we all must be gimmicks and you have all have  the answere, stupid ones that aren't observable because they happen in fairy tale land a quadrillion years ago

dead sea scrolls were writin by man the same as the bible..just ancient people trying to put reason behind there existence.
DAWG

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #156 on: September 02, 2008, 02:05:24 AM »
I would like to see the Wienerschnitzel weigh in here a bit.
I hate the State.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #157 on: September 02, 2008, 02:06:45 AM »
I would like to see the Wienerschnitzel weigh in here a bit.

lol

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #158 on: September 02, 2008, 02:49:57 AM »
lol

Der Herr Wienerschnitzel ist von dem Herrn DonkeyKong zu unterscheiden...der Herr DonkeyKong zieht Bananen vor.
I hate the State.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #159 on: September 02, 2008, 02:53:52 AM »
Der Herr Wienerschnitzel ist von dem Herrn DonkeyKong zu unterscheiden...der Herr DonkeyKong zieht Bananen vor.

Ja, ist mir schon aufgefallen.

Ich würde eher in die Kategorie "Sauerkraut" gehören.

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #160 on: September 02, 2008, 02:57:38 AM »
Ja, ist mir schon aufgefallen.

Ich würde eher in die Kategorie "Sauerkraut" gehören.

Sauerkraut ist geil, bis aufs Furzen...
I hate the State.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #161 on: September 02, 2008, 12:16:44 PM »
I would like to see the Wienerschnitzel weigh in here a bit.

Hehe.  ;D

Is it about Dinosaurs living together with humans?
That's poopoo.
Thread closed. ;D

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #162 on: September 02, 2008, 12:23:23 PM »
Ja, ist mir schon aufgefallen.
Ich würde eher in die Kategorie "Sauerkraut" gehören.

Haha, Sauerkraut mit G'selchtem und Semmelknödel, die Amis wissen ja nicht, was ihnen entgeht!  ;D

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #163 on: September 03, 2008, 06:03:32 AM »
Haha, Sauerkraut mit G'selchtem und Semmelknödel, die Amis wissen ja nicht, was ihnen entgeht!  ;D
:-X :-X :-X

Ich hasse Sauerkraut.

Wiener Schnitzel ist mir lieber.  ;D


wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #164 on: September 03, 2008, 12:48:16 PM »
:-X :-X :-X
Ich hasse Sauerkraut.

Depends on how you prepare it. You gotta mix sweet and sour kraut and add browned bacon bits and onion. And it still has to have a certain crispness.

Are we off topic? I think not. We're obviously very intelligent religious individuals. ;D

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #165 on: September 04, 2008, 10:32:40 AM »
Depends on how you prepare it. You gotta mix sweet and sour kraut and add browned bacon bits and onion. And it still has to have a certain crispness.

Are we off topic? I think not. We're obviously very intelligent religious individuals. ;D

I kon ka joint wutzle...
I hate the State.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #166 on: September 04, 2008, 01:58:46 PM »
I kon ka joint wutzle...

Hahaha, was that an attempt at Viennese?
Because it sounds Swabian!

Richtig wäre: I kon kan Joint wutzln.
Oder noch besser: I kon kan Ofen baun.

 ;D

MindSpin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9985
  • MMA > Boxing
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #167 on: September 04, 2008, 02:08:40 PM »
Discuss.

That's because you've spent most of your life glued to a computer. Get out every once in while. There are all sorts of intelligent & facinating peope out there. And, wrong as they may be, many are religious...
w

mental_masturbator

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 121
  • Getbig!
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #168 on: September 11, 2008, 12:10:51 AM »
Anthony Rizzi seems like a pretty smart guy...

http://www.iapweb.org/director.htm

DeadSquatPress

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 178
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #169 on: September 12, 2008, 11:45:42 AM »
stupid is defining intelligence based on what ones theory of life on earth is.

stupid is thinking that eventhough you don't have enough evidence to prove that
science is behind everything that you still have enough to disprove intelligent design.

stupid is not realizing that, when it comes down to it, science believers believe just as much in the unproven than religious people do.

stupid is thinking you can prove something by trying to prove it wrong first.

stupid is hopping on the anti-religion bandwagon and being just as much a sheep as religous people.


Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #170 on: September 25, 2008, 09:22:27 PM »
stupid is defining intelligence based on what ones theory of life on earth is.

stupid is thinking that eventhough you don't have enough evidence to prove that
science is behind everything that you still have enough to disprove intelligent design.

stupid is not realizing that, when it comes down to it, science believers believe just as much in the unproven than religious people do.

stupid is thinking you can prove something by trying to prove it wrong first.

stupid is hopping on the anti-religion bandwagon and being just as much a sheep as religous people.



quoted for stupidity

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #171 on: September 25, 2008, 11:53:19 PM »
stupid is defining intelligence based on what ones theory of life on earth is.

stupid is thinking that eventhough you don't have enough evidence to prove that
science is behind everything that you still have enough to disprove intelligent design.

stupid is not realizing that, when it comes down to it, science believers believe just as much in the unproven than religious people do.

stupid is thinking you can prove something by trying to prove it wrong first.

stupid is hopping on the anti-religion bandwagon and being just as much a sheep as religous people.



most stupid post on getbig so far.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #172 on: September 26, 2008, 03:02:50 AM »
most stupid post on getbig so far.

Why do you think so?
It lacks precision IMO, but by far not the most stupid post on getbig.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #173 on: September 26, 2008, 03:04:24 AM »
Why do you think so?
It lacks precision IMO, but by far not the most stupid post on getbig.

you are taking this too serious, i was just making a half assed comment. I didn't even read that post.

 ;D ;D

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: I CANNOT NAME nor have EVER MET an Intelligent Religious Person.
« Reply #174 on: September 26, 2008, 03:06:42 AM »
you are taking this too serious, i was just making a half assed comment. I didn't even read that post.
 ;D ;D

Epic back paddling because of certainty of being owned. ;D