Yes, but your fellow repubes have been using that attack out of desperation for some time now. The fact that this woman has no foreign policy experience, and two years ago was a mayor of a tiny town in Alaska is something that needs to be mentioned if she is to be a heartbeat away from being the leader of the free world.
Yet, you're using that "attack" now, since Palin just snatched your spotlight.
That someone has more executive experience than the guy HEADLINING your ticket. So, if experience doesn't matter (as the Dems, Bill Clinton in particular, claimed at the DNC), the Dems shouldn't be yakking about it now, espeically as it applies to the #2 of the GOP, NOT the #1.
I did indeed. And I take pride in not voting for the moron that will go down in history as an absolute disaster with the worst approval ratings EVER. I realize many Americans are dumb and don't vote their own best interests, so sometimes my candidate will lose.
A "moron" to whom your guys lost.....TWICE!!! What does that say about the Dems, if they can't find someone who can be this "moron"? And, what does it REALLY say about them, if Obama squandered this opportunity and loses this election.
And in a classic case of pot-calling-the-kettle-black, you might want to remember that the Democratic-controlled Congress has an approval rate of NINE (9) percent, three times LOWER than that of this "moron" President Bush. And that in less than two years.
We'll know that after the election, buddy. He has his ethnicity to overcome, and many won't vote for him regardless of his superior intelligence and the failed policies of the last four years that McCain wants to continue. Neither you or I can predict the future.
Indeed, we will know. But, one think I can predict is the excuse you and the other liberals will produce (or reproduce), if Obama doesn't get the job done. Let's see:
2000 - "We wuz robbed"
2004 - We got "swiftboated"/It's them mean, dumb ol' Christians' fault
2008 - (If Obama loses) All of the above....and more