Author Topic: For ND  (Read 34272 times)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: For ND
« Reply #100 on: September 11, 2008, 09:53:33 AM »
UMMM??? Is everyone looking at these and realizing that Dorian is looking incredible here? Ronnies lats look shit compared.

I'm a fan of both but it's clear that Yates was incredible in 95

Ya, so what if Coleman's latz are far wider along with a smaller waist & drastically better taper huh? Details, details. ::)

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: For ND
« Reply #101 on: September 11, 2008, 09:54:00 AM »
lmfao did you miss the above post?

Dorian is easily winning that shot and why? look at the main muscle the shot calls for its night & day , Dorian's lats just blow Coleman's out of the water , they have a better sweep they insert lower and they take up more space , notice the difference between now much space there is between both guys arms when doing that pose  Wink

Then factor in Dorian's arms , ARMS , biceps/triceps/forearms are all in harmony with each other and his torso , Ronnie's big biceps & triceps dominate his forearms and lets not get into torso length or the fact you can actually see Coleman's glutes in a front pose  Lips sealed then moving down to lower balance & proportion , well its obvious Yates has proportionate calves in relation to his quads , and Ronnie well lol we all know about his infamously pathetic calves

seeing all rounds are physique rounds Dorian is the clear winner in this shot


Ronnie 99 can't touch Dorian in the front latspread while thats among the best front latspreads he's shown its NOT in Dorian's league and what you just did cherry pick the criteria it doesn't work that way

Ronnie is behind Dorian in terms of density & dryness , balance & proportion , comparable in terms of muscular bulk and behind on completeness and posing


Excellent analysis. This should finally put and end to these stupid comments from Hulkster. I'm a big fan of both and have to agree with ND here.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: For ND
« Reply #102 on: September 11, 2008, 09:56:09 AM »
You can't even see their calves and Dorian is still destroying him in that comparison. Too easy.

So what if Coleman's kicking his ass on taper, defintion, detail and sweep lol Yates has him on everything else haha

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: For ND
« Reply #103 on: September 11, 2008, 09:56:52 AM »
lat thickness? hahahaha. Coleman's lats are whims of cotton compared to Yates' lats. Shit, in that picture even Cormier has bigger and thicker lats than Ron. LOL.

I laughed out loud when I read that too lol Dorian's lats are above and beyond Colemans , just look at the difference in sweep and the amount of space they fill between the arms , Dorian all the way

Hulkster is in a perpetual state of meltdown after Kevin exposed him and Bizzy and calling him a ' retard '

lmfao @ thicker lats

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: For ND
« Reply #104 on: September 11, 2008, 09:58:01 AM »
Ya, so what if Coleman's latz are far wider along with a smaller waist & drastically better taper huh? Details, details. ::)

LMFAO yeah far wider my ass , same contest

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: For ND
« Reply #105 on: September 11, 2008, 10:00:29 AM »
So what if Coleman's kicking his ass on taper, defintion, detail and sweep lol Yates has him on everything else haha

So what if Dorian destroys him on balance & proportion , density & dryness and posing and presentation not to mention completeness and oh lats , its not like any of that matters to the judged LMFAO

and see above pic their lats are NOT comparable in terms of length and your slanted comparison has them with equal lat length which means the scale is OFF and its off on purpose

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: For ND
« Reply #106 on: September 11, 2008, 10:01:13 AM »
Excellent analysis. This should finally put and end to these stupid comments from Hulkster. I'm a big fan of both and have to agree with ND here.

Thank you , you're a smart man !!  ;)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: For ND
« Reply #107 on: September 11, 2008, 10:01:56 AM »
LMFAO yeah far wider my ass , same contest

Nice shot of the barrel's nonexistent arms excellent self-ownage there. As far as backs, that's at an angle as you already know lol


Quote
Thank you , you're a smart man !!

More like patient, to wade thru all that self-indulgent meandering lol

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: For ND
« Reply #108 on: September 11, 2008, 10:08:44 AM »
Nice shot of the barrel's nonexistent arms excellent self-ownage there. As far as backs, that's at an angle as you already know lol


More like patient, to wade thru all that self-indulgent meandering lol

yeah like the angle doesn't favor Ronnie in the pic you posted  ::) wider my ass especially not in 1996

again you fear formulating a cognizant response you're content to troll and make blanket statements , you can't even use the criteria for your opinion you just cherry pick and ignore what really wins contests

hey here is another pic of Yates destroying one of your ebony heros  ;)

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: For ND
« Reply #109 on: September 11, 2008, 10:18:34 AM »
Holy FUCKKKKKKK. Yates KILLS Coleman. Coleman never had taper like this with those shitty lats of his haha

LMFAO at "ebony hero" hahahahahaha

Team Yates

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: For ND
« Reply #110 on: September 11, 2008, 10:20:58 AM »
Dorian's lats are so much thicker here it's not even funny. Coleman's are flimsy in comparison  :-\

Team Yates

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: For ND
« Reply #111 on: September 11, 2008, 11:50:10 AM »
Dorian Yates OWNED again   ;D

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: For ND
« Reply #112 on: September 11, 2008, 11:58:11 AM »
dorian yates vs coleman
we can all see who wins  8)

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: For ND
« Reply #113 on: September 11, 2008, 11:59:25 AM »
another one
  ;D

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: For ND
« Reply #114 on: September 11, 2008, 12:49:16 PM »
Durka Durka

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: For ND
« Reply #115 on: September 11, 2008, 12:53:48 PM »
Durka Durka
Durka Durka
Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka  ???
Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka  ::)
Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka  ;)
Durka   :)
Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka  :-* :-* :-*

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22064
  • #EarlToo
Re: For ND
« Reply #116 on: September 11, 2008, 01:16:33 PM »
Dorian with a smaller waist than Kevin. Fucking insane!



haha you have to be joking

E
E

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: For ND
« Reply #117 on: September 11, 2008, 01:37:38 PM »
haha you have to be joking

E

You have to admit its comparable? when held tight and flexed in this pose?

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: For ND
« Reply #118 on: September 11, 2008, 01:38:53 PM »
You have to admit its comparable? when held tight and flexed in this pose?
Kevin looks soft in that photo - Shawn and Dorian are far better conditioned.

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22064
  • #EarlToo
Re: For ND
« Reply #119 on: September 11, 2008, 01:39:36 PM »
You have to admit its comparable? when held tight and flexed in this pose?

in this pic maybe, in the hundreds of other pics NO

E
E

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: For ND
« Reply #120 on: September 11, 2008, 01:42:17 PM »
in this pic maybe, in the hundreds of other pics NO

E

Kevin clearly has a smaller waist but in that pic it looks comparable when Dorian didn't hold his obliques in tight you could see the difference

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: For ND
« Reply #121 on: September 11, 2008, 01:45:26 PM »
Kevin looks soft in that photo - Shawn and Dorian are far better conditioned.

He is that whats Kevin's main problem finding the perfect balance between size AND condition

you usually got two versions of Kevin the big soft Kevin or the small ripped one. but that's what you get when you're a part-time bodybuilder

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: For ND
« Reply #122 on: September 11, 2008, 01:46:39 PM »
He is that whats Kevin's main problem finding the perfect balance between size AND condition

you usually got two versions of Kevin the big soft Kevin or the small ripped one. but that's what you get when you're a part-time bodybuilder
And you get one version of Dorian - HARD AS NAILS

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: For ND
« Reply #123 on: September 11, 2008, 01:50:27 PM »
And you get one version of Dorian - HARD AS NAILS

Right massive and hard as nails that's Dorian's calling card

Bill Dobbins on Yates at the 1995 Olympia

As Weider photographer Bill Dobbins so succinctly put it as Yates strutted his stuff : " I have never seen such muscle development on a human being. The other guys sit around backstage talking about whether to get big or cut , what they need to do is get like Dorian. "


sums it up

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: For ND
« Reply #124 on: September 11, 2008, 01:52:40 PM »
you mean they need to show up with one arm?
Flower Boy Ran Away