Author Topic: 1993 - best ever!  (Read 114102 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83453
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #500 on: November 29, 2008, 09:10:10 AM »
yes,  you should because dorian's detail-less untrained arms and piss poor quads look like shit.

try and post something that comes CLOSE to this: \

you won't find it from Dorian.

sorry.

here he is in 93 onstage and he gets murdered by Ronnie 99 onstage.

need I continue?

yes continue with your meltdown and delusion  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83453
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #501 on: November 29, 2008, 09:13:51 AM »
Haney used to own the front latspread , then Yates stole it off of him and it ended there

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #502 on: November 29, 2008, 09:16:55 AM »

dayum, best front lat spread ever right there. It has everything and then some: muscular bulk, symmetry, definition, shape, fullness, and taper.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #503 on: November 29, 2008, 09:37:52 AM »
Quote
kid listen NO front latspread by Ronnie beats Dorian NONE

keep typing the bullshit ND.

because this one DOES:

and your melting down about it:
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #504 on: November 29, 2008, 09:38:41 AM »
I laugh at how pitful the aids man quads are compared to Ronnie's

and yet ND goes on about density, dryness, size LOL ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #505 on: November 29, 2008, 09:41:51 AM »
dorian getting some competition in the detail department...

what was that again ND? LOL
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #506 on: November 29, 2008, 09:43:28 AM »
 8)
Flower Boy Ran Away

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #507 on: November 29, 2008, 09:57:59 AM »
Dorian's legs are so much better than Ronnie's. They are simply perfect here. Ronnie's legs look like shit. Ugly turnip quads with crisco calves

Team Yates

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #508 on: November 29, 2008, 10:11:13 AM »
Dorian's legs are so much better than Ronnie's. They are simply perfect here. Ronnie's legs look like shit. Ugly turnip quads with crisco calves



I don't find them perfect at all. Knobby knees, no sweep, blah aesthetics, no great size, invisible hams. The calves while big have no aesthetics and border on ugly, which is his trademark and appeal to ND.

Generic, like ND's "logic".

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #509 on: November 29, 2008, 10:11:22 AM »
speaking of crisco, dorian was as smooth puffy and detail-less as can be:
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #510 on: November 29, 2008, 10:12:36 AM »
I don't find them perfect at all. Knobby knees, no sweep, blah aesthetics. Not compelling or special. Generic, like ND's logic.

its okay, no one else does either.

there is a good reason that the phrase 'aids man' and 'dorian's quads" go together so often by so many on this board.

its a reason that ND and his bitches will never get.. ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #511 on: November 29, 2008, 10:31:15 AM »
speaking of crisco, dorian was as smooth puffy and detail-less as can be:

Says Hulkster while posting a photo that shows a shot of the most detailed lower back of all time. ::)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #512 on: November 29, 2008, 10:39:49 AM »
Says Hulkster while posting a photo that shows a shot of the most detailed lower back of all time. ::)

Your ADD's kicking in again. Let's dwell on that skating rink mess of a front LOL other than a relative lack of size and minimal defo he's great. ???

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #513 on: November 29, 2008, 10:45:36 AM »
Your ADD's kicking in again. Let's dwell on that skating rink mess of a front LOL other than a relative lack of size and minimal defo he's great. ;)

It would seem that illiteracy (not to mention blindness) is  endemic where you live, as you continue to post photos that are not from the 1993 contest, when the title of the thread references 1993.  Such a tactic only reaffirms your inability to poke holes in the claim of the 1993 incarnation of Yates as being the best ever.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #514 on: November 29, 2008, 10:46:59 AM »
It would seem that illiteracy is  endemic where you live, as you continue to post photos that are not from the 1993 contest, when the title of the thread references 1993.  Such a tactic only reaffirms your inability to poke holes in the claim of the 1993 incarnation of Yates as being the best ever.

You're desperate to appear erudite with the long-winded diahhrea. It's very typical of those eager to impress to use too many words, looking ackward in the attempt. A blowhard. As usual your syntax and abuse of the language reveals a lack of real depth there buddy.  ;)

Here's the front again, addressing your ADD. Post a '93 shot if there's a huge difference, let's face it there ain't. ;D ;D ;D

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #515 on: November 29, 2008, 10:53:07 AM »
You're desperate to appear erudite with the long-winded diahhrea. It's very typical of those eager to impress using too many words ackwardly in the process. As usual your syntax and abuse of the language reveals a lack of real depth there buddy.

I know, right? I give him props for trying to appear intelligent but this is Getbig for f*ck sakes.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #516 on: November 29, 2008, 10:54:30 AM »
I know, right? I give him props for trying to appear intelligent but this is Getbig for f*ck sakes.

Trying is the operative word; i don't find it impressive to try to be something you're not. Even someone like Mike Tyson did it, mangling the language with amusing malaprops.

A hint to the novice here who is over-compensating for a language deficit (the ones who actually know how to construct properly don't do this). Until you really master the language it's a transparent attempt to impress after grabbing a dictionary. Your syntax has all the flow of the keg's physique. Those who know better are on to you, see through your overcompensation LOL

Where were we?

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #517 on: November 29, 2008, 11:02:36 AM »
Says Hulkster while posting a photo that shows a shot of the most detailed lower back of all time. ::)

exactly my point.

wow. a lower back that is very detailed.

and yet the rest of him is ice rink smooth..

how did he get perfect scores again?

oh yeah, shit judging...
Flower Boy Ran Away

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #518 on: November 29, 2008, 11:17:33 AM »
exactly my point.

wow. a lower back that is very detailed.

and yet the rest of him is ice rink smooth..

how did he get perfect scores again?

oh yeah, shit judging...

Meltdown. ;D

prof

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 53
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #519 on: November 29, 2008, 11:33:56 AM »
I showed my sister dorian and ronnie in the front lat spread.

She knows nothing about bodybuilding and has never seen them before. 

She said that Ronnie clearly looks better...hands down. 

Even to the untrained eye, it is obvious Ronnie is better.

BTW, she also said it looks like Ronnie is on steroids  :)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #520 on: November 29, 2008, 12:00:42 PM »
I showed my sister dorian and ronnie in the front lat spread.

She knows nothing about bodybuilding and has never seen them before. 

She said that Ronnie clearly looks better...hands down. 

Even to the untrained eye, it is obvious Ronnie is better.

BTW, she also said it looks like Ronnie is on steroids  :)

  Your sister is trailer park garbage. Her judgement is clouded by her desire for the ghetto cock. Sorry.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #521 on: November 29, 2008, 12:11:52 PM »
Quote
She said that Ronnie clearly looks better...hands down. 


its not hard to be better than dorian when dorian had little to no detail to speak of...fron the front at least..
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #522 on: November 29, 2008, 12:20:53 PM »
notice how ronnie is always hard, vascular and striated, while dorian is always smooth, soft and puffy?

yup.

and ND has the balls to go on about how dorian is dryer, harder bigger LOL

what total bullshit. of course, when ND types such crap, he never shows pics to go along with it.

gee, I wonder why?

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12160
  • Getbig!
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #523 on: November 29, 2008, 12:23:55 PM »
Damn  Wheeler  has no chance there.....





WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #524 on: November 29, 2008, 12:38:24 PM »
I showed my sister dorian and ronnie in the front lat spread.

She knows nothing about bodybuilding and has never seen them before. 

She said that Ronnie clearly looks better...hands down. 

Even to the untrained eye, it is obvious Ronnie is better.

BTW, she also said it looks like Ronnie is on steroids  :)

To an "untrained eye" is the operative terminology and apply describes all those venturing to discredit Yates's stellar career.  Being crowned Mr. Olympia encompasses more than simply "looking" better, or having what might be deemed a more pleasing physique with select "showcase" bodyparts.  Many untrained eyes might have deemed Flex Wheeler or Shawn Ray to have been worthy of the crown, but a more studious approach identifies that they were lacking in areas.  The same can be applied to Ronnie.  A Mr. Olympia should present a physique that constitutes the best combination of everything.  In this regard, Yates stands alone.  From all angles, Yates had complete development and density that his contemporaries lacked.  In 1993 Yates had not a single identifiable weak point, which can rarely, if ever be said about a physique.  

This is the area of contention that Hulkster and the like fail to have cognition of, the best overall combination.  Even in 1998, when Ronnie made great strides from prior years, he continued to lack in the area of calves and did not have the fully developed tie-ins between muscle groups that Yates had.  His chest/delt tie-ins for one.  Even while in his best conditioned state, at roughly 247 pounds, Ronnie would not have the density and width, or dryness to contend with a 257-260 pound Yates.  In latter years, Ronnie's predilection for getting heavier would only increase the disparity conditioning wise, as he continued to lose detail.  Yates had conditioning to spare and if mass became an area of contention in such a comparison, he could have afforded to come in fuller and still outcondition Ronnie, who while big and full, would be holding water.  If it is to be believed that Ronnie could have dominated Dorian, then why did he have difficulty edging out a substandard Flex Wheeler in 1998?  Or, his close calls in 2000, 2001 and 2002? How about his losing the title in defeat in 2006?  I do not recollect Dorian ever having anyone closing in on him on the score cards.  Bodybuilders who nearly toppled Ronnie, never came remotely close to Dorian.  Which is even more telling when considering that such bodybuilders were arguably better during the era when Dorian was the champ and they still got destroyed.

It has often been quoted that Yates could have stepped on stage exactly as shown in the black and white photos (socks and all) and wiped the floor with anyone.  Yates's own high standards necessitated that he come in even crisper, but had he stepped on stage in his 269 pound form, I have to wonder if a few more ninja stories would have surfaced in the industry.