Author Topic: 1993 - best ever!  (Read 113525 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #525 on: November 29, 2008, 01:22:18 PM »
Quote
In 1993 Yates had not a single identifiable weak point, which can rarely, if ever be said about a physique. 

what total bullshit ::).

how about a thick waist creating a not so hot taper? complete lack of aesthetics?

piss poor quads with little detail?

arms that literally have no definition to speak of in many angles, not to mention completely dwarfed by the rest of his physique?

calves that overpowered his physique?.

this is an abomination: shit quads,  puny small detail-less arms, monster calves that are totally out of proportion:

to the untrained eye, dorian may have seemed to have no flaws

but all you have to do is look at normal criteria - things like proportion, detail and definition - and you quickly see that dorian was deeply flawed, thanks to his superthick waist,undersized arms, and quads with the detail of an ice rink.

sorry, but its pretty damn obvious:
Flower Boy Ran Away

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #526 on: November 29, 2008, 01:26:09 PM »
Meltdown!!  As per usual, you choose to ignore the obvious when having had it pointed out how Ronnie failed to dominate nearly in the manner that Yates did during his reign.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #527 on: November 29, 2008, 01:26:57 PM »
yates looks okay, until you compare him to someone way better, someone who has aesthetics along with the mass:

then you see he had a construction worker's phyisque, not a champion bodybuilder:
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #528 on: November 29, 2008, 01:29:54 PM »
Meltdown!!  As per usual, you choose to ignore the obvious when having had it pointed out how Ronnie failed to dominate nearly in the manner that Yates did during his reign.

how does the fact that ronnie failed to dominate early in his career have ANYTHING to do with him eventually creating a physique that destroys what dorian offered in 93?

please explain for us all..

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #529 on: November 29, 2008, 01:32:01 PM »
Quote
If it is to be believed that Ronnie could have dominated Dorian, then why did he have difficulty edging out a substandard Flex Wheeler in 1998?  Or, his close calls in 2000, 2001 and 2002? How about his losing the title in defeat in 2006?  I do not recollect Dorian ever having anyone closing in on him on the score cards.  Bodybuilders who nearly toppled Ronnie, never came remotely close to Dorian.  Which is even more telling when considering that such bodybuilders were arguably better during the era when Dorian was the champ and they still got destroyed.


you can't judge bb simply by looking at scorecards..

dorian showed up with a missing arm and was not even marked down for it. so much for accurate scoring.. ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #530 on: November 29, 2008, 01:33:04 PM »
If it is to be believed that Ronnie could have dominated Dorian, then why did he have difficulty edging out a substandard Flex Wheeler in 1998?  Or, his close calls in 2000, 2001 and 2002? How about his losing the title in defeat in 2006?  I do not recollect Dorian ever having anyone closing in on him on the score cards.  Bodybuilders who nearly toppled Ronnie, never came remotely close to Dorian.  Which is even more telling when considering that such bodybuilders were arguably better during the era when Dorian was the champ and they still got destroyed.


I can't make it any clearer for you Hulkster.  You give the same copout answer as always, ha ha.  You decry the very same judging system that awarded your hero Ronnie his titles.  How is it that this system is only credible when it favours your hero Ronnie?  If the judging is valid in the awarding of Ronnie's titles, that same system should be viewed as equally as competant when considering Dorian's wins, which according to that system, were much more dominant than Ronnie's.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #531 on: November 29, 2008, 01:34:28 PM »
I can't make it any clearer for you Hulkster. 

and you can't be any more wrong..

this is how ronnie looked when dorian faced him.

and you are stupid enough to think that because of this he never achieved a better physique than dorian years later?

how sad..
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #532 on: November 29, 2008, 01:36:35 PM »
I can't make it any clearer for you Hulkster.  You give the same copout answer as always, ha ha. 

and you fail to present visuals, just like ND does..

visuals are your worst enemy

here is your 'perfect' score..

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #533 on: November 29, 2008, 01:37:36 PM »
what total bullshit.

how about a thick waist creating a not so hot taper? complete lack of aesthetics?

piss poor quads with little detail?

arms that literally have no definition to speak of in many angles, not to mention completely dwarfed by the rest of his physique?

calves that overpowered his physique?.

this is an abomination: shit quads,  puny small detail-less arms, monster calves that are totally out of proportion:

to the untrained eye, dorian may have seemed to have no flaws

but all you have to do is look at normal criteria - things like proportion, detail and definition - and you quickly see that dorian was deeply flawed, thanks to his superthick waist,undersized arms, and quads with the detail of an ice rink.

sorry, but its pretty damn obvious:

  Wow, Huckster, it is amazing you ability to repeat the same pot verbatim again and again. Hoqw many times have I addressed each and every single point you've made in this postin the Truce Thread? 300 times? A thousand? You just argue for the sake of arguing, because you have nothing left to say.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #534 on: November 29, 2008, 01:38:52 PM »
 Wow, Huckster, it is amazing you ability to repeat the same pot verbatim again and again. Hoqw many times have I addressed each and every single point you've made in this postin the Truce Thread? 300 times? A thousand? You just argue for the sake of arguing, because you have nothing left to say.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

and you have been completely wrong every time.

you can't create what dorian didn't have.

oh wait, your friend ND does - he photoshops dorian pics, thats how insecure he is about ronnie's dominace over dorian.

he knows full well its not even close, just like you probably do too..
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #535 on: November 29, 2008, 01:41:04 PM »
lol this is just so damn easy!
Flower Boy Ran Away

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #536 on: November 29, 2008, 01:43:09 PM »
how does the fact that ronnie failed to dominate early in his career have ANYTHING to do with him eventually creating a physique that destroys what dorian offered in 93?

please explain for us all..

 ::)

Perhaps you should learn how to read!  Who mentioned anything about the early part of Ronnie's career ?  It matters not what Ronnie looked like during those years, as it does not change the fact that Ronnie, once he became Mr. Olympia, DID NOT dominate as champion nearly in the manner Yates did.  Did you not see the listing of years I provided where Ronnie had close calls (AS CHAMPION)?  You are sorely lacking even the most rudimentary reading and comprehension skills, in the same manner in which Ronnie was missing calves.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #537 on: November 29, 2008, 01:45:17 PM »
This is the area of contention that Hulkster and the like fail to have cognition of

Quote
To an "untrained eye" is the operative terminology and apply describes all those venturing to discredit Yates's stellar career.  Being crowned Mr. Olympia encompasses more than simply "looking" better, or having what might be deemed a more pleasing physique with select "showcase" bodyparts.  Many untrained eyes might have deemed Flex Wheeler or Shawn Ray to have been worthy of the crown, but a more studious approach identifies that they were lacking in areas.  The same can be applied to Ronnie.  A Mr. Olympia should present a physique that constitutes the best combination of everything.  In this regard, Yates stands alone.  From all angles, Yates had complete development and density that his contemporaries lacked.  In 1993 Yates had not a single identifiable weak point, which can rarely, if ever be said about a physique. 

, the best overall combination.  Even in 1998, when Ronnie made great strides from prior years, he continued to lack in the area of calves and did not have the fully developed tie-ins between muscle groups that Yates had.  His chest/delt tie-ins for one.  Even while in his best conditioned state, at roughly 247 pounds, Ronnie would not have the density and width, or dryness to contend with a 257-260 pound Yates.  In latter years, Ronnie's predilection for getting heavier would only increase the disparity conditioning wise, as he continued to lose detail.  Yates had conditioning to spare and if mass became an area of contention in such a comparison, he could have afforded to come in fuller and still outcondition Ronnie, who while big and full, would be holding water.  If it is to be believed that Ronnie could have dominated Dorian, then why did he have difficulty edging out a substandard Flex Wheeler in 1998?  Or, his close calls in 2000, 2001 and 2002? How about his losing the title in defeat in 2006?  I do not recollect Dorian ever having anyone closing in on him on the score cards.  Bodybuilders who nearly toppled Ronnie, never came remotely close to Dorian.  Which is even more telling when considering that such bodybuilders were arguably better during the era when Dorian was the champ and they still got destroyed.

It has often been quoted that Yates could have stepped on stage exactly as shown in the black and white photos (socks and all) and wiped the floor with anyone.  Yates's own high standards necessitated that he come in even crisper, but had he stepped on stage in his 269 pound form, I have to wonder if a few more ninja stories would have surfaced in the industry. 




Grammatically speaking, that first sentence is an abortion.

Your rambling mental masturbation's reminscent of ND's poor judgement. You deserve one another and this very imperfect, over-hyped and underserving multiple champ:

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #538 on: November 29, 2008, 01:47:26 PM »
Your sister is trailer park garbage. Her judgement is clouded by her desire for the ghetto cock. Sorry.

meltdown

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #539 on: November 29, 2008, 01:48:08 PM »

That first sentence is horribly written.

Learn brevity, you're in love with your internet diahhrea that like the everready bunny just never stops.

You needn't claim it to be horribly written simply because you fail to comprehend its meaning.  More petty bickerings and deflections intended to detract from the undeniable fact that Yates was far more dominant as champion.  A tactic routinly chosen by the intellectually challenged devoid of the capacity to debate the issues, choosing instead to attack the messenger. 

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #540 on: November 29, 2008, 01:48:47 PM »

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #541 on: November 29, 2008, 01:50:09 PM »
You needn't claim it to be horribly written simply because you fail to comprehend its meaning.  

Nice try. It reeks of the same quality found here on this "perfect BB". ::)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #542 on: November 29, 2008, 01:54:27 PM »
Damn  Wheeler  has no chance there.....



That Wheeler annihilates Yates. It's a shame that several great BB were denied deserved victories due to rampant IFBB politics.

Uncle Joe's lips always hungered for white BB meat whenever possible, like ND.

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #543 on: November 29, 2008, 02:09:00 PM »
If it is to be believed that Ronnie could have dominated Dorian, then why did he have difficulty edging out a substandard Flex Wheeler in 1998?  Or, his close calls in 2000, 2001 and 2002? How about his losing the title in defeat in 2006?   I do not recollect Dorian ever having anyone closing in on him on the score cards.  Bodybuilders who nearly toppled Ronnie, never came remotely close to Dorian.  Which is even more telling when considering that such bodybuilders were arguably better during the era when Dorian was the champ and they still got destroyed.



NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83447
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #544 on: November 29, 2008, 02:32:14 PM »
If it is to be believed that Ronnie could have dominated Dorian, then why did he have difficulty edging out a substandard Flex Wheeler in 1998?  Or, his close calls in 2000, 2001 and 2002? How about his losing the title in defeat in 2006?   I do not recollect Dorian ever having anyone closing in on him on the score cards.  Bodybuilders who nearly toppled Ronnie, never came remotely close to Dorian.  Which is even more telling when considering that such bodybuilders were arguably better during the era when Dorian was the champ and they still got destroyed.




I explained this to these dummies eons ago , Dorian defeated Flex Wheeler who in 1993 was at his absolute prime with ease , Ronnie just barely beat him in 1998 when he was at his best , he beat Flex by a measly 3 points to this day one of the closest Mr Olympia's to date

Dorian would trample Ronnie and he knows it hence why he said on many occasions he could NOT beat Dorian

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • #EarlToo
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #545 on: November 29, 2008, 02:40:07 PM »
If it is to be believed that Ronnie could have dominated Dorian, then why did he have difficulty edging out a substandard Flex Wheeler in 1998?  Or, his close calls in 2000, 2001 and 2002? How about his losing the title in defeat in 2006?   I do not recollect Dorian ever having anyone closing in on him on the score cards.  Bodybuilders who nearly toppled Ronnie, never came remotely close to Dorian.  Which is even more telling when considering that such bodybuilders were arguably better during the era when Dorian was the champ and they still got destroyed.




flex was not substandard in 98 and ronnie surprised everybody in 98, being favored coming into a contest helps and you know it

how would flex 93 beat flex 98? whatever happened to "muscular bulk and density" nd ::)

the scoring is a joke, dorian getting a perfect score in 97 proves that

who cares that ronnie lost in 06?  if dorian stuck around one more year he would've lost to ronnie (if the scoring was fair) and he still would've had two less olympia titles

dorian knew he was done, that's why he retired

E
E

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #546 on: November 29, 2008, 02:44:47 PM »
flex was not substandard in 98 and ronnie surprised everybody in 98, being favored coming into a contest helps and you know it

how would flex 93 beat flex 98? whatever happened to "muscular bulk and density" nd ::)

the scoring is a joke, dorian getting a perfect score in 97 proves that

who cares that ronnie lost in 06?  if dorian stuck around one more year he would've lost to ronnie (if the scoring was fair) and he still would've had two less olympia titles

dorian knew he was done, that's why he retired

E

Your perception is very skewed.  In 1997, in less than top form, Yates destroyed everyone.  Ronnie was a distant 9th.  I can't say where Flex would have placed, as he was too scared to compete and resorted to fictional ninja stories to dodge the contest.  If history is any indicator though, Flex would have been crushed as usual. By his own admission, Flex has stated that he was not at his best in 1998. And still, Ronnie barely beat him. Had Yates competed, if we are to gauge by prior contests, Yates would have easily won again. 

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #547 on: November 29, 2008, 02:45:23 PM »
and you have been completely wrong every time.

you can't create what dorian didn't have.

oh wait, your friend ND does - he photoshops dorian pics, thats how insecure he is about ronnie's dominace over dorian.

he knows full well its not even close, just like you probably do too..

  Lmao...since you insist, let's go over this yet one more time. Dorian 1995 vs Ronnie 1999: Ronnie would have no size advantage, and Dorian would actually be a little bigger by 3 lbs. Ronnie would have more definition to his arms and maybe front quads, but Dorian would have the thicker pecs with equal definition and bigger traps. Ronnie would have superior taper in the front poses, yes, but Dorian would have superior abs/serratus. From the back, Dorian has equaivalent or superior width and thickness to his back with greater definition, but it's a push. Assume they have equivalent backs with Dorian having the edge on some areas and Ronnie on others. Dorian still wins from the back because his calves are bigger and his ass smaller, creating better proportions. Dorian's lats also insert lower. So Dorian wins from the back despite they being equivalent in development essentially because Dorian has less symmetrical flaws. From the sides, Dorian has better calves, traps and serratus with essentially the same pec development, so Dorian wins due to superior symmetry. So let's analyse how these strengh and weaknesses of both bodybuilders would play out at a hypothetical matchup between them, both in the symmetry and muscularity rounds:

  Symmetry round:

  Front relaxed - Ronnie wins in account of superior skeletal and muscular symmetry. Ronnie has structural flaws, such as having a short torso and long legs, but Dorian's structural flaws of having wide, boxy hips is more severe a liablity in this specific pose. Dorian has superior abs, traps and calves. In terms of quads and pecs they are comparable. Ronnie is superior in terms of delts, biceps and taper. All things considered, the advantages Ronnie enjoys over Dorian supercede the ones Dorian has over Ronnie, so Coleman wins.

  Side relaxed - Dorian wins hands down. If Nasser wasn't as thick from the sides at 285 lbs compared to a 255 lbs Dorian, then no way no how would Ronnie be comparable to Dorian at the same weight. In fact, Dorian at 260 lbs still holds his own against Coleman at 290 lbs in terms of thickness from the sides, so Dorian destroys Ronnie here in terms of development. When you add into the equation Dorian's superior symmetry evident by the fact that his triceps, calves and traps are in proportion from the sides whilst Ronnie's are not, it is a clear win for Dorian.

  Back relaxed - Dorian has superior thickness to his back as well as definition in my opinion. In width they are comparable, although Ronnie might appear wider due to his smaller waist. Let's for the sake of the discussion deem they equal in terms of back. Dorian still wins the back relaxed because his symmetry in this pose is superior: his calves, ass, traps and back are in proportion in relation to one another, whilst Ronnie's ass is too big in relation to his back and calves, and his calves are too small compared to his back and especially compared to his ass. Dorian wins this round.

  Muscularity round:

  Front double biceps - Ronnie wins on account of his superior taper as well as biceps although it overpowers the triceps a little bit. Both Dorian and Ronnie have biceps and triceps that are out of proportion with each other, but in this pose Dorian's biceps liability is more severe than Ronnie's triceps liability, so the edge goes to Ronnie. Coleman has superior taper and comparable everything else. They are pretty much the same in this mandatory except that Ronnie's arms look more impressive than Dorian, so this single advantage tips the scale in favor of Ronnie.

  Front lat spread - Dorian wins, no doubt. He has everything on Ronnie in this mandatory, including taper. Much wider lats, superior traps, better abs, comparable quads and superior calves. From a symmetry standpoint Doran is incredibly superior to Ronnie, both from a muscular as well as structural point of view. Dorian's muscles are far more proportioned in relation to one another in this pose than Ronnie's, who has weak calves compared to his quads, ess dramatic lat-to-waist ratio and poor forearms compared to his biceps and triceps. From a structural standpoint, Ronnie's assymetry in the sense of having short torso lengh to excessively long legs is obvious. Dorian wins hands down.

  Abs-and-thigs - Dorian's abs and serratus are better. His taper is also better despite having wider hips because his lats flare out so dramatically in this pose. In quads they are comparable in terms of size, although Ronnie might have an edge in cuts. In terms of symmetry, Dorian has better overral proportions with his taper being better, his calves and traps being bigger and thus being more proportional to the huge lats, whilst Ronnie's traps and especially calves are too small when compared to his huge lats. Overral, Dorian's advantages supercede Ronnie's in this mandatory and he wins flat out.

  Side triceps - Dorian's edge in triceps size, lengh and cut give him a severe edge in this pose, just like Ronnie's advantage in biceps size, lengh and cuts give him and advantage in the front double biceps. Dorian's calves, traps and serratus are also superior. Dorian wins this pose from a symmetry standpoint as well because his calves are in proportion with his pecs and back when seen from the sides, whilst Ronnie's calves are way too weak for his pec and lat thickness when seen from the sides. Dorian wins the pose both from a muscular as well as symmetry standpoint, on account of having more massive muscles - only Ronnie's back, pecs and back are massive in this pose, whilst Dorian has massive back, pecs, traps, triceps and calves - and wins in symmetry on account of the fact that he has massive calves and triceps that are in proportion with his massive pecs trpas and back, while Ronnie's weak calves and triceps puts of his symmetry. Dorian wins.

  Side chest - Dorian enjoys all the symmetry advantages elucidated above, but Ronnie might have the edge in pec thickness - debatable, because Dorian's pecs were far more developed from the sides than from the front, but let's give to Ronnie. Coleman might have the superior pecs, but Dorian has superior calves, serratus and, in my opinion, traps. This mandatory could go either way, because even though Dorian is far more complete in it in terms of symmetry and actually has more massive muscles in this pose than Ronnie - traps, calves and serratus -, Ronnie has better pecs.

  Back double biceps - Dorian takes this one. You would have to be extremely generoud to give it to Ronnie. Dorian has superior thickness and defintion, and is equal in terms of width. He has superior traps. both in thickness and definition, superior erectores and teres major/minor. Dorian also has more massive calves. Overral, Dorian either ties or wins in terms of back, definitely wins in terms of traps and wins in terms of calves. So he wins this pose from a muscularity point of view. In terms of symmetry, Dorian has calves that are in proportion with the massive back, whilst Ronnie's calves are too small for the back. Dorian's ass is also more in proportion with the back, hamstrings, traps and calves than Ronnie's, which is too large for the aforementioned muscles in his body. The ass is a special case, because it is the one bodypart besides the abs that becomes out of proportion with the rest ofthe physique if it grows. When it comes to ass in male bodybuilders, the smaller the better, as a big ass is a feminine trait.

  Rear lat spread - Comparable lat spread for them both. Dorian has superior traps, calves and ass. Picking at straws, Dorian wins in terms of back because his christmas-tree is thicker in the rear lat spread and his erectores are also more developed. In terms of symmetry, he once again wins on account of his bigger calves and smaller ass, which are more in proportion to his massive back than Ronnie's calves and ass, which are too small and too big respectively in comparison to his back.

  So final score:

  Dorian wins 5 of the 7 mandatories of the muscularity round and 2 of the 3 angles from the symmetry round. Now, this is only measuring muscularity and symmetry in the 3 angles of the symmetry round and in the mandatories. I am not including conditioning, which also goes to Dorian hands down when compared to Ronnie 1999.

SUCKMYMUSCLE


sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #548 on: November 29, 2008, 02:46:58 PM »

Grammatically speaking, that first sentence is an abortion.

Your rambling mental masturbation's reminscent of ND's poor judgement. You deserve one another and this very imperfect, over-hyped and underserving multiple champ:

hahaha so true

Reading this 1derfuls posts makes for some hilarious entertainment.

What i want answered is how come its so painfully obvious that in the majority of mr os dorian was outclassed something silly and DID look like trash.

I want to hear these mugs justify such abnormalities as receiving perfect scores in 97.

What must his contemporaries been thinking at the time? Surely the same that the mentally regular that inhabit this board


sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #549 on: November 29, 2008, 02:48:11 PM »
 Lmao...since you insist, let's go over this yet one more time. Dorian 1995 vs Ronnie 1999: Ronnie would have no size advantage, and Dorian would actually be a little bigger by 3 lbs. Ronnie would have more definition to his arms and maybe front quads, but Dorian would have the thicker pecs with equal definition and bigger traps. Ronnie would have superior taper in the front poses, yes, but Dorian would have superior abs/serratus. From the back, Dorian has equaivalent or superior width and thickness to his back with greater definition, but it's a push. Assume they have equivalent backs with Dorian having the edge on some areas and Ronnie on others. Dorian still wins from the back because his calves are bigger and his ass smaller, creating better proportions. Dorian's lats also insert lower. So Dorian wins from the back despite they being equivalent in development essentially because Dorian has less symmetrical flaws. From the sides, Dorian has better calves, traps and serratus with essentially the same pec development, so Dorian wins due to superior symmetry. So let's analyse how these strengh and weaknesses of both bodybuilders would play out at a hypothetical matchup between them, both in the symmetry and muscularity rounds:

  Symmetry round:

  Front relaxed - Ronnie wins in account of superior skeletal and muscular symmetry. Ronnie has structural flaws, such as having a short torso and long legs, but Dorian's structural flaws of having wide, boxy hips is more severe a liablity in this specific pose. Dorian has superior abs, traps and calves. In terms of quads and pecs they are comparable. Ronnie is superior in terms of delts, biceps and taper. All things considered, the advantages Ronnie enjoys over Dorian supercede the ones Dorian has over Ronnie, so Coleman wins.

  Side relaxed - Dorian wins hands down. If Nasser wasn't as thick from the sides at 285 lbs compared to a 255 lbs Dorian, then no way no how would Ronnie be comparable to Dorian at the same weight. In fact, Dorian at 260 lbs still holds his own against Coleman at 290 lbs in terms of thickness from the sides, so Dorian destroys Ronnie here in terms of development. When you add into the equation Dorian's superior symmetry evident by the fact that his triceps, calves and traps are in proportion from the sides whilst Ronnie's are not, it is a clear win for Dorian.

  Back relaxed - Dorian has superior thickness to his back as well as definition in my opinion. In width they are comparable, although Ronnie might appear wider due to his smaller waist. Let's for the sake of the discussion deem they equal in terms of back. Dorian still wins the back relaxed because his symmetry in this pose is superior: his calves, ass, traps and back are in proportion in relation to one another, whilst Ronnie's ass is too big in relation to his back and calves, and his calves are too small compared to his back and especially compared to his ass. Dorian wins this round.

  Muscularity round:

  Front double biceps - Ronnie wins on account of his superior taper as well as biceps although it overpowers the triceps a little bit. Both Dorian and Ronnie have biceps and triceps that are out of proportion with each other, but in this pose Dorian's biceps liability is more severe than Ronnie's triceps liability, so the edge goes to Ronnie. Coleman has superior taper and comparable everything else. They are pretty much the same in this mandatory except that Ronnie's arms look more impressive than Dorian, so this single advantage tips the scale in favor of Ronnie.

  Front lat spread - Dorian wins, no doubt. He has everything on Ronnie in this mandatory, including taper. Much wider lats, superior traps, better abs, comparable quads and superior calves. From a symmetry standpoint Doran is incredibly superior to Ronnie, both from a muscular as well as structural point of view. Dorian's muscles are far more proportioned in relation to one another in this pose than Ronnie's, who has weak calves compared to his quads, ess dramatic lat-to-waist ratio and poor forearms compared to his biceps and triceps. From a structural standpoint, Ronnie's assymetry in the sense of having short torso lengh to excessively long legs is obvious. Dorian wins hands down.

  Abs-and-thigs - Dorian's abs and serratus are better. His taper is also better despite having wider hips because his lats flare out so dramatically in this pose. In quads they are comparable in terms of size, although Ronnie might have an edge in cuts. In terms of symmetry, Dorian has better overral proportions with his taper being better, his calves and traps being bigger and thus being more proportional to the huge lats, whilst Ronnie's traps and especially calves are too small when compared to his huge lats. Overral, Dorian's advantages supercede Ronnie's in this mandatory and he wins flat out.

  Side triceps - Dorian's edge in triceps size, lengh and cut give him a severe edge in this pose, just like Ronnie's advantage in biceps size, lengh and cuts give him and advantage in the front double biceps. Dorian's calves, traps and serratus are also superior. Dorian wins this pose from a symmetry standpoint as well because his calves are in proportion with his pecs and back when seen from the sides, whilst Ronnie's calves are way too weak for his pec and lat thickness when seen from the sides. Dorian wins the pose both from a muscular as well as symmetry standpoint, on account of having more massive muscles - only Ronnie's back, pecs and back are massive in this pose, whilst Dorian has massive back, pecs, traps, triceps and calves - and wins in symmetry on account of the fact that he has massive calves and triceps that are in proportion with his massive pecs trpas and back, while Ronnie's weak calves and triceps puts of his symmetry. Dorian wins.

  Side chest - Dorian enjoys all the symmetry advantages elucidated above, but Ronnie might have the edge in pec thickness - debatable, because Dorian's pecs were far more developed from the sides than from the front, but let's give to Ronnie. Coleman might have the superior pecs, but Dorian has superior calves, serratus and, in my opinion, traps. This mandatory could go either way, because even though Dorian is far more complete in it in terms of symmetry and actually has more massive muscles in this pose than Ronnie - traps, calves and serratus -, Ronnie has better pecs.

  Back double biceps - Dorian takes this one. You would have to be extremely generoud to give it to Ronnie. Dorian has superior thickness and defintion, and is equal in terms of width. He has superior traps. both in thickness and definition, superior erectores and teres major/minor. Dorian also has more massive calves. Overral, Dorian either ties or wins in terms of back, definitely wins in terms of traps and wins in terms of calves. So he wins this pose from a muscularity point of view. In terms of symmetry, Dorian has calves that are in proportion with the massive back, whilst Ronnie's calves are too small for the back. Dorian's ass is also more in proportion with the back, hamstrings, traps and calves than Ronnie's, which is too large for the aforementioned muscles in his body. The ass is a special case, because it is the one bodypart besides the abs that becomes out of proportion with the rest ofthe physique if it grows. When it comes to ass in male bodybuilders, the smaller the better, as a big ass is a feminine trait.

  Rear lat spread - Comparable lat spread for them both. Dorian has superior traps, calves and ass. Picking at straws, Dorian wins in terms of back because his christmas-tree is thicker in the rear lat spread and his erectores are also more developed. In terms of symmetry, he once again wins on account of his bigger calves and smaller ass, which are more in proportion to his massive back than Ronnie's calves and ass, which are too small and too big respectively in comparison to his back.

  So final score:

  Dorian wins 5 of the 7 mandatories of the muscularity round and 2 of the 3 angles from the symmetry round. Now, this is only measuring muscularity and symmetry in the 3 angles of the symmetry round and in the mandatories. I am not including conditioning, which also goes to Dorian hands down when compared to Ronnie 1999.

SUCKMYMUSCLE



regurgitated from your laughable performance on the truce thread?

I'm sure i ve read this trash before.