I never said the rich pay 97% of the taxes. The rich pay roughly 50% of the taxes.
How am I being a demagogue?? I'm stating facts, not playing on emotions. I think you're doing that with the "rightwingers who would just as soon see a single mother left to the streets rather than a governmenatl program that could help her comment. What the hell does that mean?
It means that any tax on the rich is too much of a tax. Under a progressive income tax system EVERYBODY PAYS THE SAME TAX RATE. The more money earned, the higher tax for that amount in that particular bracket. Just b/c some Jimdandy is in the 35% bracket does not mean he pays 35% on all money earned.
There's a difference in someone living off the gov't for years and someone who needs some assistance for a short time. Besides, you're contradicting yourself. The rich are the ones who carry the tax burden while a lot of these taxes are going to their government programs to support them. How much are we (the tax payers) supposed to support someone who:
A: Doesn't pay their share of the tax burden?
B: Depends on government to keep food on their table.
Where's the contradiction? As I pointed out, everybody pays the same tax rate at the same tax bracket--how is that not paying their fair share? Most AFDC recipients are off the dole less than 2 years:
Percent of
Time on AFDC Recipients
-------------------------------
Less than 7 months 19.0%
7 to 12 months 15.2
One to two years 19.3
Two to five years 26.9
Over five years 19.6
source: Overview of Entitlement Programs, Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994).
That's old Info too. With Clinton's reformation of Welfare, they are kicked off even faster.
Seems to me these welfare programs should carry a big share of the blame on this economic problem.
And did you know when Clinton issued his welfare reform Obama was against it?? It's true.
I was against Clinton's welfare reform too. Welfare is about 1% of gov. expenditures. What problem are you referring to?