Author Topic: Bullshit supplements at the convention.  (Read 21852 times)

timfogarty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7108
  • @fogartyTim on twitter
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #75 on: October 03, 2008, 05:08:11 PM »
A pump or capilarization can add 20% to a muscle size

1) evidence please
2) only while you're on the drug

Ursus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11338
  • Getbig!
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #76 on: October 03, 2008, 05:12:06 PM »
I mena in general.

I subscribe to the theory that if natural you need to use relatively heavy weight to build muscle. However by pumping th emuscle over time you can add 20% to teh muscle. My coach told me this. Thats why  in training routines its all heavy at tstart then pumpy shit and more reps at the end supersets etc...if you like ill ask him for a link.

I dont believe that chasing the pump is the key to bodybuiolding

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9912
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #77 on: October 03, 2008, 05:44:00 PM »
::) unbelievable

you claimed phenyalanine is an analgesic and anti depressant when taken separately but not in the form of whole protein - i disagreed and claimed at equal dosages it would make no difference - protein is protein.

you provided proof that phenylalanine is an analgesic and anti depressant when taken alone - again no comparison with a complete protein source with equal amounts of phenyalanine.

you have provided no studies that compare equal amounts of phenylalanine both alone or as part of a complete protein source. therefore have not proven your claim that it has distinct effects when taken alone. in fact:
the patent you posted below leads more weight to my claim that a more complete protein source with the same amount of phenylalanine has the same effects regardless of phenylalanine by itself.

"Phenylalanine, , D-leucine, DL-leucine and hydrocinnamic
acid have been found to possess analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity."

please stop trying to play with words and dance around your claim by wordplay.

can you or can you not provide a study that shows distinct effects of phenylalanine when taken alone over a complete protein source with an equal amount of phenylalanine?

yes or no?

don't worry professor, i already know you can't.  ::)



i provided direct evidence that phenyalanine has both properties i stated, i met your challenge as stated.

also i provided evidence that amino acids compete with each other for substrates, and when taken together or as a complete protein they have different pysiological effects because of this. For example some amino acids become substrates for others like glutamine being conditionally essential, some are required to catalyze enzymatic reactions.

No such study exists because no one would do the study because it is a retarded, illogical and moronic study that everyone knows already. Whole proteins do not exert the effects of some of the individual amino acids when taken alone, everyone in biochemistry already knows this FACT, to disprove it as you are asking me to do only takes a basic overview of protein metabolism, if you can show that amino acids dont exert unique effects in contrast to what is known then you sir are a nobel prize winner.

But Since you are not a man of your word and didnt read the link i provided earlier i will hand feed you examples of amino acid competition, hence whole proteins with all these aminos would cause inhibition and interaction, nulifying the individual effects.By the way this is COMMON KNOWLEDGE, absolutely 100% proven fact and the fact that your questioning it shows me you have little to no education in the field.

Here are some known interactions

Taurine, glycine, GABA, and alanine - are antagonistic to glutamic acid and aspartic acid.
Tyrosine and phenylalanine are antagonistic to tryptophan.
Tyrosine and vanadium are antagonistic to carnitine.
Lysine is antagonistic to sulfur-containing amino acids.
Glycine, proline, and arginine increase threonine absorbtion.


phenylalanine interacts with tryptophan as they compete for the rate limiting step tyrosine hydroxylase.

YOU CLAIMED I SAID "you claimed phenyalanine is an analgesic and anti depressant when taken separately but not in the form of whole protein - i disagreed and claimed at equal dosages it would make no difference - protein is protein."

To prove this i posted studies, to prove you wrong specifically all i have to show is that phenyalanine and tryptophan compete for an enzyme to exert its effects, since your claim is that if 1 gram of phenyalanin is taken alone or 1 gram is taken with other aminos REGARDLESS of the other amino acid content that the analgesic and anti depressant effect would be the same. This is patently false because if the protein source is high in tryptophan then there will be competitive inhibition of some of the phenyalanine. Protien is not protein either, if you skew the amino profile hugely you can exert some unique effects, however free form single administration is much more effecitive and predictable.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9912
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #78 on: October 03, 2008, 06:02:45 PM »
here this even has free full text on pubmed , start reading

 Related Articles, LinksFernstrom JD.

Role of precursor availability in control of monoamine biosynthesis in brain.
Physiol Rev. 1983 Apr;63(2):484-546. Review. No abstract available.
PMID: 6132421 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

also. Quick excerpt from a study i have

http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/137/6/1539S#BIB1

"As a result, physiologic and pathophysiologic factors that influence blood concentrations of these amino acids and others that compete with them for a common transporter across the blood brain barrier [the large neutral amino acids (LNAA)] predictably alter aromatic amino acid concentrations in brain, the formation and release of these monoamine transmitters, and consequently brain function "

my case is proven. Your an idiot, make the thread stop dodging the fucking agreement.

I hate stupid people FTR.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9912
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #79 on: October 03, 2008, 06:05:41 PM »
here this even has free full text on pubmed , start reading

 Related Articles, LinksFernstrom JD.

Role of precursor availability in control of monoamine biosynthesis in brain.
Physiol Rev. 1983 Apr;63(2):484-546. Review. No abstract available.
PMID: 6132421 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

also. Quick excerpt from a study i have

http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/137/6/1539S#BIB1

"As a result, physiologic and pathophysiologic factors that influence blood concentrations of these amino acids and others that compete with them for a common transporter across the blood brain barrier [the large neutral amino acids (LNAA)] predictably alter aromatic amino acid concentrations in brain, the formation and release of these monoamine transmitters, and consequently brain function "

my case is proven. Your an idiot, make the thread stop dodging the fucking agreement.

I hate stupid people FTR. Perhaps you are getting caught up on the fact that yes protein is composed on amino acids. However, to get some of the unique effects of the proteins aminos hence why supplements are avalible(if you where right why would there be supplements? seems kinda stupid doesnt it?) you would have to skew the profile to quite a degree and also make sure that the inhibiting and competeing factors are low, as well as neutral aminos that have downstream effects(not that you have a clue what i meant by that). Cofactors are also required for catalyzation.



Zach Trowbridge

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1732
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #80 on: October 03, 2008, 10:10:55 PM »
i will pay you a million dollars for maize starch from potato. Idiot.

Jason

If my 3rd grade Native American history serves me well, maize = corn, not maize = potato.  You are a million dollars richer.

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #81 on: October 04, 2008, 04:10:53 AM »


No such study exists



bingo - until you can show me a study that compares what i asked you are wasting your time.

i agree different protein sources ( comprised of different levels of each bcaa) will all have slightly different microbiological effects on the body, due to specific effects of each bcaa and their interactions, however this effect would also be insignificant due to the low dosages in the complete protein source compared to the high dosaged in the studies you posted.

remember this is a bodybuilding board, and the talk was started to discuss the benefits of taking a bcaa suplement over a complete protien source, not if you take a high enough dosages of a specific animo you would get a drug like effect (obviously taking enough of anything would eventually have some specific effect on the body) i.e. if you take 1kg of beef you will have a drug like effect, or 1kg of pasta, etc

bcaa supplements have no benefit over a complete protein source.

if someone introduced a bcaa supplement with 1000x the dosages of bcaa than found in a complete protein source then maybe it would be of benefit, but they aren't.

again all you do is play with words, i am not the fool you think, i can see through your petty attempts at deflection.

you have based your arguments stupid useless facts about Tyrosine and phenylalanine fighting with tryptophan to get access to the brain barrier.

tell me genius - what difference does this have for bodybuilders? also where does the Tyrosine and phenylalanine go if beaten to the brain barrier by tryptophan?

you are humiliatimg yourself here.

 ::)
175lbs by 31st July

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #82 on: October 04, 2008, 04:13:21 AM »
bingo - until you can show me a study that compares what i asked you are wasting your time.

i agree different protein sources ( comprised of different levels of each bcaa) will all have slightly different microbiological effects on the body, due to specific effects of each bcaa and their interactions, however this effect would also be insignificant due to the low dosages in the complete protein source compared to the high dosaged in the studies you posted.

remember this is a bodybuilding board, and the talk was started to discuss the benefits of taking a bcaa suplement over a complete protien source, not if you take a high enough dosages of a specific animo you would get a drug like effect (obviously taking enough of anything would eventually have some specific effect on the body) i.e. if you take 1kg of beef you will have a drug like effect, or 1kg of pasta, etc

bcaa supplements have no benefit over a complete protein source.

if someone introduced a bcaa supplement with 1000x the dosages of bcaa than found in a complete protein source then maybe it would be of benefit, but they aren't.

again all you do is play with words, i am not the fool you think, i can see through your petty attempts at deflection.

you have based your arguments stupid useless facts about Tyrosine and phenylalanine fighting with tryptophan to get access to the brain barrier.

tell me genius - what difference does this have for bodybuilders? also where does the Tyrosine and phenylalanine go if beaten to the brain barrier by tryptophan?

you are humiliatimg yourself here.

 ::)

:D :D :D
I agree 100%

Are you an MD, panda?

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #83 on: October 04, 2008, 04:14:55 AM »
:D :D :D
I agree 100%

Are you an MD, panda?

hahaha i wish i was for the cash, and free access to drug prescriptions  :D

just an overly obsessed wannabe bodybuilder  :D
175lbs by 31st July

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #84 on: October 04, 2008, 04:18:01 AM »
hahaha i wish i was for the cash, and free access to drug prescriptions  :D

just an overly obsessed wannabe bodybuilder  :D

I'm still waiting for empirical evidence which shows that any supplement out there has a significant effect on the purpose of bodybuilding when all other factors are kept constant. There is none. It's all bullshit backed up by pseudo-science or inapplicable scientific aspects.

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #85 on: October 04, 2008, 04:21:43 AM »
I'm still waiting for empirical evidence which shows that any supplement out there has a significant effect on the purpose of bodybuilding when all other factors are kept constant. There is none. It's all bullshit backed up by pseudo-science or inapplicable scientific aspects.

exactly:
sports drinks - no advantage over milk.
bcaa - no advantage over - meat or dairy
creatine - no advantage over beef
etc etc
175lbs by 31st July

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #86 on: October 04, 2008, 04:27:20 AM »
Here's an easy test for anyone who thinks supplements are backed by serious science:
Ask your doctor what "supplements" you should take for health, well-being, and sports.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9912
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #87 on: October 04, 2008, 08:05:16 AM »
bingo - until you can show me a study that compares what i asked you are wasting your time.

i agree different protein sources ( comprised of different levels of each bcaa) will all have slightly different microbiological effects on the body, due to specific effects of each bcaa and their interactions, however this effect would also be insignificant due to the low dosages in the complete protein source compared to the high dosaged in the studies you posted.

remember this is a bodybuilding board, and the talk was started to discuss the benefits of taking a bcaa suplement over a complete protien source, not if you take a high enough dosages of a specific animo you would get a drug like effect (obviously taking enough of anything would eventually have some specific effect on the body) i.e. if you take 1kg of beef you will have a drug like effect, or 1kg of pasta, etc

bcaa supplements have no benefit over a complete protein source.

if someone introduced a bcaa supplement with 1000x the dosages of bcaa than found in a complete protein source then maybe it would be of benefit, but they aren't.

again all you do is play with words, i am not the fool you think, i can see through your petty attempts at deflection.

you have based your arguments stupid useless facts about Tyrosine and phenylalanine fighting with tryptophan to get access to the brain barrier.

tell me genius - what difference does this have for bodybuilders? also where does the Tyrosine and phenylalanine go if beaten to the brain barrier by tryptophan?

you are humiliatimg yourself here.

 ::)

what do you mean bingo?
 
no such study exists because the scientific community is aware that self adminsitration of aminos has a different effect then co-administration because of competition. Here you have you, someone with no education in the field and me, someone who has some and you are arguing with me on something you know nothing about.

bcaas do have distinct effects over protein supplements, your statment is wrong.

if they compete and dont get the substrate they are excreted GENIUS, fuck this is like arguing with a kid.

Do you have any knowledge of simple biochemistry? Answer this question. I have proven that phenylalanine has the effects i stated, i have proven that other aminos compete for transport or substrates.
 
I have proven you wrong with scientific studies, articles and text and you still claim because a bogus study in which you yourself have designed doesnt exist i am wrong. LMAO!!! i already told you that no one would do the study, Its like you asking me to find a study comparing the effects of alcohol vs carbs to see if both cause intoxication because beer contains carbs.


Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9912
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #88 on: October 04, 2008, 08:06:12 AM »
I'm still waiting for empirical evidence which shows that any supplement out there has a significant effect on the purpose of bodybuilding when all other factors are kept constant. There is none. It's all bullshit backed up by pseudo-science or inapplicable scientific aspects.

will brink told you, you were wrong, i told you you were wrong. You have no training in the field and yet you get spreading your lies and misinformation.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9912
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #89 on: October 04, 2008, 08:09:42 AM »
bingo - until you can show me a study that compares what i asked you are wasting your time.

i agree different protein sources ( comprised of different levels of each bcaa) will all have slightly different microbiological effects on the body, due to specific effects of each bcaa and their interactions, however this effect would also be insignificant due to the low dosages in the complete protein source compared to the high dosaged in the studies you posted.

remember this is a bodybuilding board, and the talk was started to discuss the benefits of taking a bcaa suplement over a complete protien source, not if you take a high enough dosages of a specific animo you would get a drug like effect (obviously taking enough of anything would eventually have some specific effect on the body) i.e. if you take 1kg of beef you will have a drug like effect, or 1kg of pasta, etc

bcaa supplements have no benefit over a complete protein source.

if someone introduced a bcaa supplement with 1000x the dosages of bcaa than found in a complete protein source then maybe it would be of benefit, but they aren't.

again all you do is play with words, i am not the fool you think, i can see through your petty attempts at deflection.

you have based your arguments stupid useless facts about Tyrosine and phenylalanine fighting with tryptophan to get access to the brain barrier.

tell me genius - what difference does this have for bodybuilders? also where does the Tyrosine and phenylalanine go if beaten to the brain barrier by tryptophan?

you are humiliatimg yourself here.

 ::)

Ètell me genius - what difference does this have for bodybuilders? also where does the Tyrosine and phenylalanine go if beaten to the brain barrier by tryptophan?È


it has a big difference. For example BCAAS are popular and leucine has been shown by itself to increase protein synthesis. However, tryp also competes with leucine so proteins high in tryp will cause greater excreation of leucine dampening the effect. Therefore, taking high doses of leucine alone will cause increased protein synthesis and less competition.

Pretty fucking straightforward, dont know how you cant see the benefit there. It goes down the gamit also. Why does tryptophan make people tired but protien not?

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9912
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #90 on: October 04, 2008, 08:31:29 AM »
Here's an easy test for anyone who thinks supplements are backed by serious science:
Ask your doctor what "supplements" you should take for health, well-being, and sports.

well in two years you can ask me and i will recommend and plethora of supplements to you. Look at the study i posted of phenylalanine vs tofranil(a presciption anti-d that is potentially cardiotoxic, has anti cholinergic sides etc). Both where similarly effective, why would anyone take tofranil for depression with its nasty sides vs phenylalanine and its beneign sides?

SUPPLEMENTS ARE BACKED BY DOUBLE BLIND STUDIES, WHAT SERIOUS SCIENCE ARE YOU REFERRING TO?

Zach Trowbridge

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1732
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #91 on: October 04, 2008, 08:56:24 AM »
Here's an easy test for anyone who thinks supplements are backed by serious science:
Ask your doctor what "supplements" you should take for health, well-being, and sports.

Stupidest post of the day.  Your average doctor couldn't even name a supplement, let alone provide any sort of scientific insight into benefits or lack thereof.  Most doctors I've encountered only know what they learned in med school, which was basically what they learned in one lecture of one class of one semester.  Doctors are not specialists when it comes to the supplement industry.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #92 on: October 04, 2008, 09:00:15 AM »
Stupidest post of the day.  Your average doctor couldn't even name a supplement, let alone provide any sort of scientific insight into benefits or lack thereof.  Most doctors I've encountered only know what they learned in med school, which was basically what they learned in one lecture of one class of one semester.  Doctors are not specialists when it comes to the supplement industry.

Then why do you think is it that doctors don't learn about it in med school?

Zach Trowbridge

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1732
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #93 on: October 04, 2008, 09:04:40 AM »
Then why do you think is it that doctors don't learn about it in med school?

Because they have more important things to worry about, like cancer, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, Parkinsons, angina, epilepsy, narcolepsy, skeletal fractures, athsma, hypertension, hypoglycemia, etc.  How many do you think a doctor sees more of, somebody who needs to take medication to reduce their blood pressure, or a bodybuilder who wants to know whether creatine monohydrate is more or less efficient than creatine ethyl ester?  Sports supplements apply to less than 1% of the general population.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #94 on: October 04, 2008, 09:06:02 AM »
will brink told you, you were wrong, i told you you were wrong. You have no training in the field and yet you get spreading your lies and misinformation.

well in two years you can ask me and i will recommend and plethora of supplements to you. Look at the study i posted of phenylalanine vs tofranil(a presciption anti-d that is potentially cardiotoxic, has anti cholinergic sides etc). Both where similarly effective, why would anyone take tofranil for depression with its nasty sides vs phenylalanine and its beneign sides?

SUPPLEMENTS ARE BACKED BY DOUBLE BLIND STUDIES, WHAT SERIOUS SCIENCE ARE YOU REFERRING TO?

Replied to in the N, P & S thread.

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #95 on: October 04, 2008, 09:16:52 AM »

if they compete and dont get the substrate they are excreted


hahahahahahaha you are a clown - delete your acount right now, and go back to your 'education'.  ::)

it has a big difference. For example BCAAS are popular and leucine has been shown by itself to increase protein synthesis. However, tryp also competes with leucine so proteins high in tryp will cause greater excreation of leucine dampening the effect. Therefore, taking high doses of leucine alone will cause increased protein synthesis and less competition.



hahahahahahaha clearly you are retarded, try taking high doasages of leucine instead of a compete protein source and reply here in a year, and tell me how much muscle you have gained  ::) or are you once again claiming that leucine stimulates protein synthesis more than a complete protein source  ::)
175lbs by 31st July

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #96 on: October 04, 2008, 09:24:30 AM »
Because they have more important things to worry about, like cancer, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, Parkinsons, angina, epilepsy, narcolepsy, skeletal fractures, athsma, hypertension, hypoglycemia, etc.  How many do you think a doctor sees more of, somebody who needs to take medication to reduce their blood pressure, or a bodybuilder who wants to know whether creatine monohydrate is more or less efficient than creatine ethyl ester?  Sports supplements apply to less than 1% of the general population.

Good point, but my guess is that if anything would actually work, most doctors would at least know about it. Could be wrong though.

Zach Trowbridge

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1732
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #97 on: October 04, 2008, 10:40:28 AM »
Good point, but my guess is that if anything would actually work, most doctors would at least know about it. Could be wrong though.

Unfortunately, in my experience, you are.  I've worked as a personal trainer for almost 5 years and encountered a lot of resistance from medical doctors when it comes to client supplementation, even on things like multi-vitamins or essential fats.  I'm not claiming to know everything, in fact, a lot of the posting in this thread has been educational for me, but dietary supplementation, and even diet in general, appears to be rather far down on the list of educational priorities for your average general practitioner.

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #98 on: October 04, 2008, 12:30:47 PM »
Unfortunately, in my experience, you are.  I've worked as a personal trainer for almost 5 years and encountered a lot of resistance from medical doctors when it comes to client supplementation, even on things like multi-vitamins or essential fats.  I'm not claiming to know everything, in fact, a lot of the posting in this thread has been educational for me, but dietary supplementation, and even diet in general, appears to be rather far down on the list of educational priorities for your average general practitioner.

i have noticed distinct effects of fats when taken in large quantities, between flax oil, olive oil, and hemp oil. so to me they are valuable supplements, if not taken in adequate quantities through diet.

i take large dosages of vit c and multi vit and mineral - i have never noticed any effect from these, however i have read enough about vitamin c, and vitamins in general to feel they are worth the risk.

there is actually a patent that states vit c cures heart disease. it was discovered by a nobel prize winner linus pauling. although it is not well documented or publicised - i wonder why?
175lbs by 31st July

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9912
Re: Bullshit supplements at the convention.
« Reply #99 on: October 04, 2008, 01:01:42 PM »
hahahahahahaha you are a clown - delete your acount right now, and go back to your 'education'.  ::)

hahahahahahaha clearly you are retarded, try taking high doasages of leucine instead of a compete protein source and reply here in a year, and tell me how much muscle you have gained  ::) or are you once again claiming that leucine stimulates protein synthesis more than a complete protein source  ::)

nice retort ::) you havent provided one argument in this whole thread, i met your challenge you backed out, simple as that. Amino acids when they have no substrate can be used in glycogenesis,gluconeogenesis, adipose formation, it all depends on the bodies current state. But they do get broken down into UREA and excreted, are you again arguing this scientific fact?

i didnt say that leucine could stimulate protein synthesis more so then protein, would you like me to post the SCIENTIFIC research? im sure you have no knowledge on the matter so why do i keep wasting my time.

Again i have met your challenge, make the thread be a man. I have proven beyond a resonable doubt that specific amino acids exert effects when in isolation, and have given research and the mechanism.

I wont waste my time with you anymore unless you provide a cogent argument against these scientific facts, one of us is wrong, our positions are mutually exclusive. Who to believe? the guy with no education, and hasnt said one intelligent thing is this thread or people who have studied nutrition, biochemistry and have to assesed by an educational facility on that knowledge?

Are you arguing that amino acids dont compete? Please enlighten us. LMAO!!