Awesome Paul Dillett

[Wiggs]

Nasser sucked.....Deal with it.

[bigbobs]

No , no the judges are always right and they have the final say , but YOU on the other hand pick and choose when they are right I on the other hand DON'T that's the difference

when it goes your way the judges are on the money , when it doesn't they're on the take , gay , racist , biased , and every other excuse you can come up with

LOL all I said was that it would have been nice for Paul if the judges agreed that he was better than Nasser.  That's a simple statement and fact, and even Paul would agree.  After all, if the judges did believe that he would have placed higher, made more money, etc. i.e. it would have been nice for him

Hypocracy is people like Wiggs who suggest that judges were WRONG to place Nasser higher than Dillet (by saying Dillet was better), yet they also believe that the judges were RIGHT in placing Yates ahead of Nasser each year, therefore using the judges when it goes their way.

[Wiggs]

Why do you guys always complain about his posing?  He was a freaky monster, who gives a fuck that his posing wasn't exactly classical.

Because his posing (even mandatories) was so bad it took away from his physique.  The shaking, not being able to properly complete a front or rear double biceps and lat spreads really hurt him.

[bigbobs]

Because his posing (even mandatories) was so bad it took away from his physique.  The shaking, not being able to properly complete a front or rear double biceps and lat spreads really hurt him.

Why would he not be able to "properly complete" a pose? 

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL all I said was that it would have been nice for Paul if the judges agreed that he was better than Nasser.  That's a simple statement and fact, and even Paul would agree.  After all, if the judges did believe that he would have placed higher, made more money, etc. i.e. it would have been nice for him

Hypocracy is people like Wiggs who suggest that judges were WRONG to place Nasser higher than Dillet (by saying Dillet was better), yet they also believe that the judges were RIGHT in placing Yates ahead of Nasser each year, therefore using the judges when it goes their way.

Again you can't have it both ways either the judges are always right or always wrong

The judges are right when the pick Nasser over Dillett , but clearly wrong when they pick Yates over Nasser , I mean seriously

[bigbobs]

Again you can't have it both ways either the judges are always right or always wrong

The judges are right when the pick Nasser over Dillett , but clearly wrong when they pick Yates over Nasser , I mean seriously

Let's ask Wiggs to pick whether the judges are always right or always wrong.

And for the record, yes you can have it both ways.  In some years judging is done fairly while in other years it is not - the 2007 Mr. Olympia was not fair for example to place Cutler ahead of Martinez, yet the 2000 Mr. O was fair to place Coleman the winner...just a few examples.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Why would he not be able to "properly complete" a pose? 

Nasser couldn't hit the side chest & front lat spreads technically correct either , but I guess they were saying Paul had a shoulder injury that prevented him from posing in some shots to their best advantage and diurectics make people cramp up and shake

[Wiggs]

LOL all I said was that it would have been nice for Paul if the judges agreed that he was better than Nasser.  That's a simple statement and fact, and even Paul would agree.  After all, if the judges did believe that he would have placed higher, made more money, etc. i.e. it would have been nice for him

Hypocracy is people like Wiggs who suggest that judges were WRONG to place Nasser higher than Dillet (by saying Dillet was better), yet they also believe that the judges were RIGHT in placing Yates ahead of Nasser each year, therefore using the judges when it goes their way.

Please show me where I said the judges were wrong....
I said Paul Dillet was a better bodybuilder than Nasser  He's more complete, better proportions and conditioning.  Oh yeah and he doesn't use synthol....He will be remembered more than Nasser, guarenteed.

[Jeffro]

Because his posing (even mandatories) was so bad it took away from his physique.  The shaking, not being able to properly complete a front or rear double biceps and lat spreads really hurt him.

Yes, I've already replied to a similar post, I agree.  But since I'm not an IFBB judge, I dont care about his posing

[NarcissisticDeity]

Let's ask Wiggs to pick whether the judges are always right or always wrong.

And for the record, yes you can have it both ways.  In some years judging is done fairly while in other years it is not - the 2007 Mr. Olympia was not fair for example to place Cutler ahead of Martinez, yet the 2000 Mr. O was fair to place Coleman the winner...just a few examples.

No we're talking about you , stop trying to deflect and 12 individuals all come to the same conclusion separately they're always right regardless of what you think

[bigbobs]

Please show me where I said the judges were wrong....
I said Paul Dillet was a better bodybuilder than Nasser  He's more complete, better proportions and conditioning.  Oh yeah and he doesn't use synthol....He will be remembered more than Nasser, guarenteed.

Saying that Dillet is better than Nasser is by default implying judges were incorrect, since Nasser had higher placings.  All I said in response was that it would have been nice for Paul if they agreed, and that has been causing a page of meltdowns lol.

[m8]

http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/paul%2Bdillet/video/x282pv_paul-dillet-explosion_extreme

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Saying that Dillet is better than Nasser is by default implying judges were incorrect, since Nasser had higher placings.  All I said in response was that it would have been nice for Paul if they agreed, and that has been causing a page of meltdowns lol.

Overall one can be better and not have great contest placings , plenty of people placed higher than Flex Wheeler at a contest but weren't better than him overall , but I'm not sure I agree with Paul being better overall than Nasser

[Wiggs]

Let's ask Wiggs to pick whether the judges are always right or always wrong.

And for the record, yes you can have it both ways.  In some years judging is done fairly while in other years it is not - the 2007 Mr. Olympia was not fair for example to place Cutler ahead of Martinez, yet the 2000 Mr. O was fair to place Coleman the winner...just a few examples.

Neither. "It is what it is". I've seen some messed up stuff.  Ronnie over Jay in 01.  Gunter over Ronnie at GNC 02.  etc...
Problem is you have a history of blaming the judges for Nasser's misfortunes...Then when I made that statement you immediatly used the judges which you disagree with often to validate your arguement. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Neither. "It is what it is". I've seen some messed up stuff.  Ronnie over Jay in 01.  Gunter over Ronnie at GNC 02.  etc...
Problem is you have a history of blaming the judges for Nasser's misfortunes...Then when I made that statement you immediatly used the judges which you disagree with often to validate your arguement. 

he's got you there Bobs

[bigbobs]

Neither. "It is what it is". I've seen some messed up stuff.  Ronnie over Jay in 01.  Gunter over Ronnie at GNC 02.  etc...
Problem is you have a history of blaming the judges for Nasser's misfortunes...Then when I made that statement you immediatly used the judges which you disagree with often to validate your arguement. 

I haven't followed your posts in particular, but people who are anti-Nasser always use the argument that Yates got better contest placings than Nasser and therefore had a better physique, even in 97.  Therefore, when you posted that Dillet was better than Nasser, my natural defense was to use the same "contest placings" logic against that statement.

That does not mean I agree wholeheartedly with all judges' decisions.  For the record I also believe Paul Dillet got unfairly shafted by judges in more shows than not.

[Earl1972]

great physique, the scariest bodybuilder of all time

he was a terrible poser and was proof that it takes SKILL for a bodybuilder to place as high as possible

E

[Wiggs]

Well for the record IMO Nasser should have beat Dorian in 97 based on the direction they were going.
Although I would have had Shawn Ray in first.

I lost all respect for Nasser once he went synthol on us and started selling his undies online.
I've spoken with him many times and he was always a gentleman.

[bigbobs]

Well for the record IMO Nasser should have beat Dorian in 97 based on the direction they were going.
Although I would have had Shawn Ray in first.

I lost all respect for Nasser once he went synthol on us and started selling his undies online.
I've spoken with him many times and he was always a gentleman.

If you really think he sells his undies try sending him an email asking to buy them and see if you even get a response.  He has gotten such emails in the past but ignores them.

[Wiggs]

I'll pass but someone put a link to his site some years ago and that's what was on there.

[bigbobs]

I'll pass but someone put a link to his site some years ago and that's what was on there.

 

[ASJChaotic]

 

[Canadian_Muscle]

yes nasser was a big fucker
so was ruhl.....he was bigger....does that mean he should have won Mr. O too?
no
he never did win it, he sucked cock at the end of his career and quit....GET OVER IT
hope this helps

How dare you bad mouth Ruhl like that.

[Jeffro]

Crazy shit, wide as fuck.

[millerbishop]

 :oMother of Pearl that's a big bitch!! you can park a car in between those teeth though