Hitler led....Stalin led...Pol Pot led....he hasn't done shit but outspend the Repubs and hoodwink the populace...just wait. He's already backing off his bullshit claims.
Exactly, the ability to lead does not equate to "good" leadership.
Now I am not equating Obama to Hitler by any means, but like all men who have a natural ability to lead and to be able to get the people singing their praises before they have done anything worthy of praise, is something they both have in common.
Hitler was a magnificent speech giver...obviously though what he did with this power was horrendous. No, I am not implying that in any way Obama is anything like Hitler...just wanted to clarify that again.
...and by "Magnificent Speech Giver" I am not referring to the ability to read and speak eloquently, that's all fine and dandy; but the ability to stir peoples emotions, to be able to speak to people in a manner where they feel you are speaking to their hearts (regardless if you actually are or not) is what makes any potential leader a threat to those who are after his position.
That's where Obama succeeded and McCain failed.
And for the record, most all future leaders, including Obama, get to their positions because they use fear on some level. Obama created a feeling of fear for the "right" by way of speaking to the public in terms they could relate to. However you look at it, it's still fear. He painted doom and gloom if McCain/Palin came to leadership...I call that fear.
