luke hasnt provided any links or citations simply said google it, he will learn if he goes to college that this doesnt fly and he will have to provide citations for sources
...I left college (physics) nearly seven years ago. Haven't you even been reading the answers I've posted to YOUR questions?
I have explained why I don't post direct links... because then the source is attacked (unfairly) by those who themselves only post faulty apologist arguments from pro-Christian sites.
I've explained that this is a specific argument tactic... and it works.
I claimed that Attis was crucified.
McWay Googles an article about Attis and points out that Attis dies by castrating himself... but the same article he posted and selectively quoted (but obviously didn't read) also details how Attis' followers found his lifeless body and nailed it to a tree. So McWay learns a little something and makes my point for me.
I claimed that Issa was a direct copy of Jesus.
McWay Googles an article about Issa and counters that Issa is merely the Muslim name for Issa... but then I point out that a little more research will show Issa is buried in Kashmir. Again, McWay learns a little something and makes my point for me.
It works... let your detractors counter the claim, then use the source THEY cited to illustrate why they are wrong.
Just like this instance... you join this thread solely for the purpose of attacking me, then those reading the thread interject asking YOU to make proper arguments and stop the
ad hominem attacks.
Have YOU learned anything by making my point for me?
The Luke