LOL how are they assinine?
all have a genetic component that leads to a specific behavior do they not? Ill answer for you, YES
So therefore they can be talked about together in a discussion about behavior and genetic predisposition can they not? again ill answer for you, YES
I understand your point of view that the things he compared homosexuality to are considered bad behaviors...but the point is vaild if you are socially expected to overcome these behaviors then why not homosexuality? His point is that just b/c it may have a genetic component to it doesnt make it ok, which is what she asked.
I don't even know what you're referring to anymore when you say "all".
I do think sexual identity has a genetic component (though it's irrelevent to me either way).
I don't necessarily think being prone to violence or shyness has any clear genetic component but for the sake of argument lets just say they do.
So what?
Warren (and you) choose to construct the specific comparison by picking a negative trait (violence) and then say well we all agree that X is bad so if X is genetic and Y is genetic then then Y must be bad too.
It's complete bullshit but for some reason you think it's logical
Using the same logic one could compare a positive genetic trait (let's pretend that compassion had a genetic component)and then say well X is good and Y is like X so Y must be good.
Both examples are complete bullshit for the exact same reasons
How many different times do you need this explained.