« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out  (Read 3856 times)

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #25 on: January 23, 2009, 07:32:28 AM »
Quote from: QuakerOats on January 23, 2009, 07:31:15 AM
i don't give two shits what the scale says, i'm saying he doesn't LOOK 300 pounds.

Oh, I agree, but he is :)

http://mdtv.musculardevelopment.com/content/view/1873/204/

anyway 315 after a long ass flight to the states :)
Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #26 on: January 23, 2009, 07:33:14 AM »
Quote from: lovemonkey on January 23, 2009, 07:32:13 AM
That "friend" of your looks pretty bangable.

she is hehe
Logged

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #27 on: January 23, 2009, 07:34:48 AM »
swede doesnt do it for less.
Logged

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #28 on: January 23, 2009, 07:40:25 AM »
So this guy Martin, does he train?
Logged

lovemonkey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7750
  • Two kinds of people; Those that can extrapolate
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #29 on: January 23, 2009, 07:43:33 AM »
Quote from: Figo on January 23, 2009, 07:40:25 AM
So this guy Martin, does he train?

If lifting several vials and ingesting an abnormal amount of pills every day is the same thing as training, then so be it.
Logged
from incomplete data

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #30 on: January 23, 2009, 07:46:37 AM »
Quote from: lovemonkey on January 23, 2009, 07:43:33 AM
If lifting several vials and ingesting an abnormal amount of pills every day is the same thing as training, then so be it.

haha, Before you could say the first letter of your name this post would be deleted and you ip banned on the average swedish forum  ;D



that's why I love it here   :'(
Logged

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17464
  • MAGA
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #31 on: January 23, 2009, 07:48:25 AM »
Quote from: QuakerOats on January 23, 2009, 07:31:15 AM
i don't give two shits what the scale says, i'm saying he doesn't LOOK 300 pounds.
If you saw him in person you would belive it trust me.
Logged

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #32 on: January 23, 2009, 08:24:31 AM »
Quote from: QuakerOats on January 23, 2009, 07:09:42 AM
nothing wrong with his "structure", dumbass.

hahaha  ;D
Logged

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #33 on: January 23, 2009, 08:25:56 AM »
Quote from: Stavios on January 23, 2009, 08:24:31 AM
hahaha  ;D
hahaha, i love how a guy can be a shredded 255 pounds and these little fuccking queens always find something wrong with them. ::)
Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #34 on: January 23, 2009, 09:33:02 AM »
Quote from: QuakerOats on January 23, 2009, 08:25:56 AM
hahaha, i love how a guy can be a shredded 255 pounds and these little fuccking queens always find something wrong with them. ::)

he is a shredded 300 dumbass
Logged

oldman

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 882
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #35 on: January 23, 2009, 09:42:36 AM »
so we know three things, he is a legit 300lbs, he is big next to a five ft tall 99lb piece of ass, and he will be in last place.  no back and he doesnt know how to pose...all the way big dude, dime a dozen.
Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2009, 09:47:24 AM »
Quote from: oldman on January 23, 2009, 09:42:36 AM
so we know three things, he is a legit 300lbs, he is big next to a five ft tall Dexter jackson height 99lb piece of ass, and he will be in last place.  no back and he doesnt know how to pose...all the way big dude, dime a dozen.

Never said he was a champ.

But show me another man thats gonna compete this years who is 300 pounds and shredded like that though =)
Logged

HTexan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20031
  • Heath must lose!!
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #37 on: January 23, 2009, 09:50:38 AM »
built dude
Logged
A

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #38 on: January 23, 2009, 09:59:13 AM »
Come on people- Fancy pack spotting!!
Logged
a

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #39 on: January 23, 2009, 10:18:01 AM »
Quote from: HeyNow on January 23, 2009, 10:17:13 AM
I agree with QO to an extent.  All of these guys claim "300lbs shredded on stage"  but in reality Ruhl, Coleman, Cutler, etc never got on stage at 300lbs(I think).  I think Coleman competed at 298 a few times.
This guy is more like 275 shredded and putting him next to a thin female does no justice, here is a pic of me next to my GF and I am no where near 275-300lbs, but I look pretty big.


Look at the video where he STANDS on a scaly then, or shut the fuck up.
Logged

lovemonkey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7750
  • Two kinds of people; Those that can extrapolate
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #40 on: January 23, 2009, 10:19:13 AM »
What the hell, where did HeyNow's post go??

I was just about to say "epic drawing a black cock in your face".

Damn.  >:(
Logged
from incomplete data

HeyNow

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 436
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #41 on: January 23, 2009, 10:19:39 AM »
Quote from: Swede! on January 23, 2009, 10:18:01 AM
Look at the video where he STANDS on a scaly then, or shut the fuck up.

I just noticed the video, so I removed my post.  Your right guy is 300lbs.  
Logged

HeyNow

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 436
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #42 on: January 23, 2009, 10:21:42 AM »
Quote from: lovemonkey on January 23, 2009, 10:19:13 AM
What the hell, where did HeyNow's post go??

I was just about to say "epic drawing a black cock in your face".

Damn.  >:(

I does look like that doesn't it?  I big black one!  What was I thinking :)
Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #43 on: January 23, 2009, 10:21:48 AM »
Quote from: HeyNow on January 23, 2009, 10:19:39 AM
I just noticed the video, so I removed my post.  Your right guy is 300lbs.  

great =)
Logged

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #44 on: January 23, 2009, 10:24:16 AM »

Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #45 on: January 23, 2009, 10:25:06 AM »
Quote from: Pollux on January 23, 2009, 10:24:16 AM


Martin wouldnt fit in the photo if it was taken as close as arnolds was
Logged

DeltsaForce

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #46 on: January 23, 2009, 10:27:42 AM »
bald and ugly
Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #47 on: January 23, 2009, 10:29:51 AM »



and 10 years ago he weighed 150 pounds and was a long distance runner
Logged

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #48 on: January 23, 2009, 10:41:48 AM »
Quote from: Swede! on January 23, 2009, 10:29:51 AM



and 10 years ago he weighed 150 pounds and was a long distance runner
REALLY!? :o
Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #49 on: January 23, 2009, 10:43:22 AM »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »