So military genius HH6 how many minutes does it take?

[IFBBwannaB]

because I could counter with pages and pages of detailed breakdowns of why WTC7 was physically impossible, from many physicists and mechanical engineers and other structural experts.

That's what we were doing 3 years ago.  What is the point?

Fucking sour loser, this is the most basic equation of movement, it describes movement under constant acceleration in a very good manner.

You claimed freefall speed, I PROOVED it wrong.

Now you understand the problem? You "counter" with pages and pages of shit you know nothing about, that's you will always remain as the forum clown.

[IFBBwannaB]

www.google.com

pointless to debate it at this point.  I did it for months and months.  big waste of time.  there are thousands of people with phds demanding a new investigation, along with 1/2 of the 911 commissioners (including the two co-chairs) who want a 2nd investigation.

IfbbwannaB is an anonymous engineer who is trying to sell a document that even its own authors will not support.  Go figure.

I "sold" you Newton's kinematic equation based on YOUR info, I'm sorry that I use the work of one of the smartest humans that ever were and will be to prove you wrong instead of just posting shit and not understanding it.

[IFBBwannaB]

Bump for 240 inability to two inputs in an equation.

[240 is Back]

Bump for 240 inability to two inputs in an equation.

bump for you to blow me

[IFBBwannaB]

bump for you to blow me

Meltdown bitch, you got owned by the master, Sir.Newton himself, that's an honor trailer trash boy.

[240 is Back]

Meltdown bitch, you got owned by the master, Sir.Newton himself, that's an honor trailer trash boy.

come on, do that tongue thing that larry craig said you were so good at

[tonymctones]

hahahah ahhh 

[240 is Back]

Meltdown bitch, you got owned by the master, Sir.Newton himself, that's an honor trailer trash boy.

so you're an engineer who is on getbig 24/7?  Interesting.

[tonymctones]

so you're an engineer who is on getbig 24/7?  Interesting.

just refute the equation

[IFBBwannaB]

so you're an engineer who is on getbig 24/7?  Interesting.

24/7? Sorry I'm not here around the clock like you, but I do have a 99% of my day access to the internet so I check here and then. I guess the interwebzzzz haven't hit it big in the trailer park yet ah?

[240 is Back]

just refute the equation

this from the guy who calls name nonstop instead of debating?  Ah yes.

Seriously, there are plenty of articles from both sides on WTC7.  Believe whichever you want.  I spent too long debating 911.  I know it's an inside job, as do the majority of americans.  Beyond that, eh...

[tonymctones]

this from the guy who calls name nonstop instead of debating?  Ah yes.

Seriously, there are plenty of articles from both sides on WTC7.  Believe whichever you want.  I spent too long debating 911.  I know it's an inside job, as do the majority of americans.  Beyond that, eh...

what would you like to debate son? im up for anything that isnt ignorant but i guess that really ties your hands doesnt it?

[240 is Back]

what would you like to debate son? im up for anything that isnt ignorant but i guess that really ties your hands doesnt it?

son?  hi shawn ray.

[tonymctones]

son?  hi shawn ray.

so you wouldnt like to debate anything then?

[IFBBwannaB]

Once again we have proved how ridiculous 240 is, he can read millions of articles that fit his needs yet he can't do a simple equation from high school.

[240 is Back]

Once again we have proved how ridiculous 240 is, he can read millions of articles that fit his needs yet he can't do a simple equation from high school.

So you're saying that every physicist, engineer, and other phd who said the collapse couldn't have happened as NIST claimed - they're all wrong then?

[IFBBwannaB]

So you're saying that every physicist, engineer, and other phd who said the collapse couldn't have happened as NIST claimed - they're all wrong then?

I'm saying that you are wrong when you base your CT theories on buildings that fall at free fall speed which as I have done is easily proved false.

I do believe that those scientists are wrong too, many others believe that it is possible. It's not for me or you to fully analyze such a complex physical system, what we or at least I can do is assert which of the two theories that have been given seems more logical and plausible.

Don't forget, scientists are humans too and some want to believe CT's too and make it cloud their judgment.

When you start to look at it from a pure physical standpoint it seems more and more plausible.

[a_joker10]

So you're saying that every physicist, engineer, and other phd who said the collapse couldn't have happened as NIST claimed - they're all wrong then?

Yes they are wrong.
Plus all of these truthers questions about WTC 7 were answered to prove them wrong.

The NIST report is backed by ASCE.

The American Society of Civil Engineers.
http://content.asce.org/conferences/structures2009/program.html
It is a member based organization that does not rely on government for funding.
It is also the largest structural engineering organization in the world.


It is ok for you to be wrong too.

[OzmO]

I'm saying that you are wrong when you base your CT theories on buildings that fall at free fall speed which as I have done is easily proved false.

I do believe that those scientists are wrong too, many others believe that it is possible. It's not for me or you to fully analyze such a complex physical system, what we or at least I can do is assert which of the two theories that have been given seems more logical and plausible.

Don't forget, scientists are humans too and some want to believe CT's too and make it cloud their judgment.

When you start to look at it from a pure physical standpoint it seems more and more plausible.

Not to mention that many of these scientists are basing their conclusions on incomplete information.

[IFBBwannaB]

Not to mention that many of these scientists are basing their conclusions on incomplete information.

Not to mention 240 is shutting up and with all of his million proofs he can't dispute a simple kinematic equation.

Bump for shutting up the biggest forum loud mouth blabbing trailer park trash.

[tonymctones]

Not to mention 240 is shutting up and with all of his million proofs he can't dispute a simple kinematic equation.

Bump for shutting up the biggest forum loud mouth blabbing trailer park trash.

LOL YEA ill bump it for that

[240 is Back]

loud mouth blabbing trailer park trash.

see, lines like this make me want to skullfvck you.

[IFBBwannaB]

see, lines like this make me want to skullfvck you.

Lines like this make me think you're a gay trailer park trash who gets pounded by his crack addicted wife while she wares a homemade strap on.

[IFBBwannaB]

So 240 can you please enlighten us to how you disproved Sir.Newton work? Did you use a Lagrangian?
Special relativity was used? Tensors? Black holes formations?

The science community is all ears just waiting for you....

[240 is Back]

Lines like this make me think you're a gay trailer park trash who gets pounded by his crack addicted wife while she wares a homemade strap on.

you can't even spell.  You're an "enginner"?   [sic] lol...