Author Topic: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia  (Read 17937 times)

Big Worm

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3969
  • Really ? You finished turd my flend? Maricon..
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #75 on: February 12, 2009, 07:59:57 AM »

Fixed

Nassoil beat his wife and did drugs? Where's his Sandow? He's as much a criminal and liar as all the other Pros.

Playboy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11318
  • If the bar ain't bending, you're just pretending
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #76 on: February 12, 2009, 08:27:05 AM »
This thread is ridiculous, period. If Nasser was sooooooooooo good then why has he never one a single Olympia or even multiple ASC titiles? Simple, because he was NOT as good as people hyped him up to be. Bottom line. Get over it.

BIG_STI

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2596
  • www.illpumpyouup.com/
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #77 on: February 12, 2009, 08:27:31 AM »
Gimmick after gimmick attacking each other in this thread.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #78 on: February 12, 2009, 09:01:53 AM »
  ;)

Nasser is furthest from the camera in that shot, Levrone is much closer

Gimmick after gimmick attacking each other in this thread.

Let's hear your theories - which accounts are gimmicks and who operates them?  ::)

Nasser has the widest, Flex by far the thickest back. Who's that dude in the middle without the calves?? ???


 ???

HugeAl

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 449
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #79 on: February 12, 2009, 09:07:37 AM »
damn, looks like another olympia where nasser got screwed . his back is better than ronnies there.

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #80 on: February 12, 2009, 09:13:26 AM »
MODS....Can you PLEEEEAAAASSSEEE create a child board where the big 3 (bigknobs, saharma,Sharif saladtosser) can fellate each other whilst singing the praises of Nasser?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83360
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #81 on: February 12, 2009, 09:15:03 AM »
Nasser is furthest from the camera in that shot, Levrone is much closer

Let's hear your theories - which accounts are gimmicks and who operates them?  ::)

 ???

ha ha ha ha he's just like Nasser in the pic you posted all the way to the left , you have your excuses  ;)

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #82 on: February 12, 2009, 09:17:23 AM »
damn, looks like another olympia where nasser got screwed . his back is better than ronnies there.

Countdown to you being accused of being my gimmick, or Sharma's gimmick 3....2....1....

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #83 on: February 12, 2009, 09:18:47 AM »
ha ha ha ha he's just like Nasser in the pic you posted all the way to the left , you have your excuses  ;)

You do realize there is more than one dimension right?  In the pic you posted Nasser is further away vertically.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #84 on: February 12, 2009, 09:19:53 AM »
MODS....Can you PLEEEEAAAASSSEEE create a child board where the big 3 (Groink, Big Worm, AussiePro) can fellate each other whilst obsessing over Nasser?

I agree

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83360
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #85 on: February 12, 2009, 09:26:43 AM »
You do realize there is more than one dimension right?  In the pic you posted Nasser is further away vertically.

the point being pictures can be deceptive , just because you found one that favors your point of view doesn't mean it accurate , neither is the one I posted , the only way to gauge is a picture taken dead on from the back

Nasser never had a great rear latspread even at his best , stop making blanket statements because Fux is clearly wider than Nasser and his rear latspread was better in 1998

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #86 on: February 12, 2009, 09:29:08 AM »
the point being pictures can be deceptive , just because you found one that favors your point of view doesn't mean it accurate , neither is the one I posted , the only way to gauge is a picture taken dead on from the back

Nasser never had a great rear latspread even at his best , stop making blanket statements because Fux is clearly wider than Nasser and his rear latspread was better in 1998

The picture I posted is not dececeptive as it's scaled pretty accurately; they are all practically the same height from head to toe.  In 98 Nasser's lat spread was wider than Ronnie's and Wheeler's (and his hams and calves were better too).  That's the point of this thread, I'm sure you can admit.

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #87 on: February 12, 2009, 09:30:51 AM »
the point being pictures can be deceptive , just because you found one that favors your point of view doesn't mean it accurate , neither is the one I posted , the only way to gauge is a picture taken dead on from the back

Nasser never had a great rear latspread even at his best , stop making blanket statements because Fux is clearly wider than Nasser and his rear latspread was better in 1998

ND, there was a great FLEX pictorial featuring Nasser and Fux working out together (not the one in the video clip where Fux looks pregnant) around 98. It was in B&W and Fux was bigger than Nasser & in better shape. You know the one I'm talking about? If you do, can you scan it by any chance? There was a double page spread of both of them doing a front lat spread and Fux looked mind blowing, making Nasser look smaller (not small, though).

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83360
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #88 on: February 12, 2009, 09:38:31 AM »
The picture I posted is not dececeptive as it's scaled pretty accurately; they are all practically the same height from head to toe.  In 98 Nasser's lat spread was wider than Ronnie's and Wheeler's (and his hams and calves were better too).  That's the point of this thread, I'm sure you can admit.

It's accurate because you want it to be  ::) again his rear latspread is neither the widest in that contest or the best just because you find one pic where it appears he's wider than Ronnie doesn't mean he is or he's better because of it , lots of things go into rear latspreads such as calves and lats , width doesn't make a better pose

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83360
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #89 on: February 12, 2009, 09:42:52 AM »
ND, there was a great FLEX pictorial featuring Nasser and Fux working out together (not the one in the video clip where Fux looks pregnant) around 98. It was in B&W and Fux was bigger than Nasser & in better shape. You know the one I'm talking about? If you do, can you scan it by any chance? There was a double page spread of both of them doing a front lat spread and Fux looked mind blowing, making Nasser look smaller (not small, though).

I know which article you're talking about I don't think I have that magazine I would have to check ! Fux was super wide and had a great back , much better than Nassers

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #90 on: February 12, 2009, 09:49:13 AM »
I know which article you're talking about I don't think I have that magazine I would have to check ! Fux was super wide and had a great back , much better than Nassers

Cool, please PM me if you do find it and scan the pics. And it wasn't just the back - the first pics were of both of them flexing their arms and again, Fux was bigger and in better shape. Back then I wanted Fux or Mike Francois to win the title after Dorian retired. I never liked Ronnie at that point, but once I saw the shape he was in, in 98 and then on, I became a fan, although more of his physique than of his personality.

Too bad Fux could never bring it all together onstage - he was the one guy who could have done what Dorian did and taken things to the next level. Even Ronnie and Mike Francois couldn't achieve his size, shape and density. I think Fux would have been more muscular and complete overall at 300 lb than Ronnie was around 2003, if he had trained correctly and brought the look onstage, which he of course, never did :-\

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23812
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #91 on: February 12, 2009, 09:56:43 AM »
Overall Ronnie.
Nasser looks bigger.
.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #92 on: February 12, 2009, 09:59:00 AM »
It's accurate because you want it to be  ::)

It's inaccurate because you want it to be ::)

Christopher Belinksky

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 440
  • The Coach loves sticky studs!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #93 on: February 12, 2009, 10:00:40 AM »
why do you even argue about 11 years ago?
it has past, the people who won, won because the judges saw they deserved it, nasser was a good bodybuilder
but he was no where close to Dorian Yates, Ronnie Coleman and Kevin Levrone.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #94 on: February 12, 2009, 10:01:49 AM »
And it wasn't just the back - the first pics were of both of them flexing their arms and again, Fux was bigger and in better shape.

 ::)

Too bad Fux could never bring it all together onstage - he was the one guy who could have done what Dorian did and taken things to the next level. Even Ronnie and Mike Francois couldn't achieve his size, shape and density. I think Fux would have been more muscular and complete overall at 300 lb than Ronnie was around 2003, if he had trained correctly and brought the look onstage, which he of course, never did :-\

Fux had size, yes, but shape and density?  He looked pretty smooth onstage and had by far the largest gut.  It was distended in practically every pose.  He was in his best shape in 97 and I remember seeing his side chest pose where it distended out very far, I don't have a copy of the pic though.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83360
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #95 on: February 12, 2009, 10:03:52 AM »
It's inaccurate because you want it to be ::)

I admitted neither is accurate and it doesn't matter if he was the widest ( which he wasn't Fux is clearly wider ) or the best

Nasser never had great back shots , his back double biceps wasn't great , his rear latspread wasn't great and neither was his standing relaxed from the rear he dominated from the front , not from the side or the rear , why do you think most pics of him are from the front?

CalvinH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22222
  • Spastic Tarted Cvunt
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #96 on: February 12, 2009, 10:05:26 AM »
Cool, please PM me if you do find it and scan the pics. And it wasn't just the back - the first pics were of both of them flexing their arms and again, Fux was bigger and in better shape. Back then I wanted Fux or Mike Francois to win the title after Dorian retired. I never liked Ronnie at that point, but once I saw the shape he was in, in 98 and then on, I became a fan, although more of his physique than of his personality.

Too bad Fux could never bring it all together onstage - he was the one guy who could have done what Dorian did and taken things to the next level. Even Ronnie and Mike Francois couldn't achieve his size, shape and density. I think Fux would have been more muscular and complete overall at 300 lb than Ronnie was around 2003, if he had trained correctly and brought the look onstage, which he of course, never did :-\





Stop beating around the bush and pretending you want a pm pic of a oiled up,g-string wearing bb and just ask out ND already :D

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #97 on: February 12, 2009, 10:07:26 AM »
::)

Fux had size, yes, but shape and density?  He looked pretty smooth onstage and had by far the largest gut.  It was distended in practically every pose.  He was in his best shape in 97 and I remember seeing his side chest pose where it distended out very far, I don't have a copy of the pic though.

You misunderstand, my good man - I was referring to the FLEX pictorial only. I never saw Fux look better than Nasser or Dorian onstage, because he never came in full and conditioned. In that one pictorial though, both Nasser and him were working out together and Yes, he does look bigger and better than Nasser. They were both around 300 lb, although Fux was heavier by about 15 lb or so during the time those pics were taken. You must bear in mind that he had just as big a bone structure as Nasser and was a little taller (he was 6 feet even).

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #98 on: February 12, 2009, 10:09:20 AM »
You misunderstand, my good man - I was referring to the FLEX pictorial only. I never saw Fux look better than Nasser or Dorian onstage, because he never came in full and conditioned. In that one pictorial though, both Nasser and him were working out together and Yes, he does look bigger and better than Nasser. They were both around 300 lb, although Fux was heavier by about 15 lb or so during the time those pics were taken. You must bear in mind that he had just as big a bone structure as Nasser and was a little taller (he was 6 feet even).

Depending on their offseason bodyweights at the time of the photoshoot he may have looked a bit bigger (if he was carrying more bf at the time of the photoshoot than Nasser).  I used the rolley-eye emoticon because you said both bigger and in better shape :)

Christopher Belinksky

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 440
  • The Coach loves sticky studs!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Widest/Best rear lat spread at the 98 Olympia
« Reply #99 on: February 12, 2009, 10:10:27 AM »
::)

Fux had size, yes, but shape and density?  He looked pretty smooth onstage and had by far the largest gut.  It was distended in practically every pose.  He was in his best shape in 97 and I remember seeing his side chest pose where it distended out very far, I don't have a copy of the pic though.

so you compared Nasser to

The 6 time (atleast) crowned Mr. O [DY]
The 8 time (atleast) crowned Mr. O [RC]
The best bodybuilding record (atleast) in history [KL]

and now you're comparing him to JF?  ::)