Author Topic: Behind the neck press vs Military press  (Read 3581 times)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Behind the neck press vs Military press
« Reply #25 on: March 10, 2009, 09:30:22 AM »
Actually there is nothing written in stone that any type of partial reps prevent injury. That is misleading information. Partial reps can cause problems for people just as full ROM can.

Excellent work in stating the obvious, which is that any exercise can cause injury. That has nothing to do with the fact that in the case of BNP, partials have less potential for injury relative to full ROM. There, i said it, thereby clearly up jpm's confusion.

jpm101

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2996
Re: Behind the neck press vs Military press
« Reply #26 on: March 10, 2009, 09:39:00 AM »
Please prove you point about LESS injury potential with regards to full ROM's. Good Luck.
F

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Behind the neck press vs Military press
« Reply #27 on: March 10, 2009, 09:40:38 AM »
Please prove you point about LESS injury potential with regards to full ROM's. Good Luck.

The onus is squarely on "jpm" to disprove what is commonly considered a given on this forum and others, that is to avoid the bottom ROM on BNP and pulldowns. Many have said this.