Author Topic: Wasilla Welfare Role Just Increased by Two (Read 6036 times)

BM OUT · « **Reply #25 on:** March 12, 2009, 12:06:32 PM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on March 12, 2009, 11:41:29 AM

Yeah, I consider having a high school dropout unwed teenage daughter with no marriage in sight to be the ideal family values model.

Good job. Next!

Where was your outrage over a f'n strung out junkie,driving his car at over 100mph with a pharmacy in his car like Al Gores kid?Oh,thats right,hes a lib kid so thats ok.Heres a bet.You will NEVER have to pay once cent of your tax money to care for Palins kid,but in a few years you will be paying to keep Gores kid locked up.

240 is Back · « **Reply #26 on:** March 12, 2009, 12:17:56 PM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on March 12, 2009, 12:06:32 PM

Heres a bet.You will NEVER have to pay once cent of your tax money to care for Palins kid

Hey champ?
She goe Earned Income Credit for her kid last year if she filed taxes. She's always sapped some taxpayer dollars.

BM OUT · « **Reply #27 on:** March 12, 2009, 12:26:55 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on March 12, 2009, 12:17:56 PM

Hey champ?
She goe Earned Income Credit for her kid last year if she filed taxes. She's always sapped some taxpayer dollars.

Hey stupid, thats money that was ALREADY THE MOTHERS.THATS YOUR MONEY THAT YOU KEEP YOU STUPID LITTLE TWIT.If you pay taxes and get taxes back its your f'n money CHAMP.Your problem,like all liberals problem is you think the government has ANY money.They dont,its OUR money you jackass!!!

240 is Back · « **Reply #28 on:** March 12, 2009, 12:30:16 PM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on March 12, 2009, 12:26:55 PM

Hey stupid, thats money that was ALREADY THE MOTHERS.THATS YOUR MONEY THAT YOU KEEP YOU STUPID LITTLE TWIT.If you pay taxes and get taxes back its your f'n money CHAMP.Your problem,like all liberals problem is you think the government has ANY money.They dont,its OUR money you jackass!!!

wait a second...

A mother earning under 100k deserves a tax break on her kid, but those mothers making over 100k do not?

Sounds like some socialist bullshit you're trying to defend.

BM OUT · « **Reply #29 on:** March 12, 2009, 12:57:55 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on March 12, 2009, 12:30:16 PM

wait a second...

A mother earning under 100k deserves a tax break on her kid, but those mothers making over 100k do not?

Sounds like some socialist bullshit you're trying to defend.

I dont believe in ANY income taxes.I believe in sales taxes.I think income taxes are against the constitution.So,no,I dont think those making uner 100,00 should pay taxes or over should pay taxes.Then Again,ythe only thing I want from the government is to protect our safety[foreign and domestic]and fix infastructure and maybe PUBLIC EDUCATION,OR MAYBE NOT.

240 is Back · « **Reply #30 on:** March 12, 2009, 01:02:35 PM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on March 12, 2009, 12:57:55 PM

I dont believe in ANY income taxes.I believe in sales taxes.I think income taxes are against the constitution.So,no,I dont think those making uner 100,00 should pay taxes or over should pay taxes.Then Again,ythe only thing I want from the government is to protect our safety[foreign and domestic]and fix infastructure and maybe PUBLIC EDUCATION,OR MAYBE NOT.

B Palin could have rejected the EIC this year, citing the fact it only comes to poor people with kids, not everyone. It's welfare - repubs criticized the shit out of it when Reagan created it and called it socialism. it's essentially money for poor ppl who have kids. i think the cutoff is actually 38k or something. I don't get it because we make more than that. it's crap that someone like palin gets the free $ hookup, and most of us do not, because we go to work every day instead of hanging out chillin.

shootfighter1 · « **Reply #31 on:** March 12, 2009, 01:03:26 PM »

Great point, I don't believe in income tax either. A greater nationwide sales tax makes sense.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #32 on:** March 12, 2009, 01:15:51 PM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on March 12, 2009, 12:06:32 PM

Where was your outrage over a f'n strung out junkie,driving his car at over 100mph with a pharmacy in his car like Al Gores kid?Oh,thats right,hes a lib kid so thats ok.Heres a bet.You will NEVER have to pay once cent of your tax money to care for Palins kid,but in a few years you will be paying to keep Gores kid locked up.

Well considering that this thread is about :

1 - Wasilla
2 - Bristol

it should be obvious that is the topic being discussed. If you want, you can start a new thread about Al Gore's kid. Hope this helps.

Meanwhile back to the thread topic....

BM OUT · « **Reply #33 on:** March 12, 2009, 01:36:49 PM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on March 12, 2009, 01:15:51 PM

Well considering that this thread is about :

1 - Wasilla
2 - Bristol

it should be obvious that is the topic being discussed. If you want, you can start a new thread about Al Gore's kid. Hope this helps.

Meanwhile back to the thread topic....

Ok,so the kid got knocked up.Millions do it everyday.In fact Id be willing to bet money that at least 60% of democratic voters are people that either had kids out of wedlock or are kids that were born out of wedlock.In fact,I believe the story is Obama was born out of wedlock.The idea that its an outrage because it happened to a conservative who preaches abstinence is silly.

The way it relates to Gore is this.His goofball wife and him were in charge of the PMRC.They wanted a ban on music that touted the use of drugs and drinking.Their kid turned out to be a drug addict.If you cant see the similarity,then your even more blind then I thought.Shit happens,parents do the best they can,in the end its up to the kid what they do.Do you do everything your parents told you to or avoid everything they told you to avoid.Why would Palin be any different?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #34 on:** March 12, 2009, 01:42:03 PM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on March 12, 2009, 01:36:49 PM

Ok,so the kid got knocked up.Millions do it everyday.In fact Id be willing to bet money that at least 60% of democratic voters are people that either had kids out of wedlock or are kids that were born out of wedlock.In fact,I believe the story is Obama was born out of wedlock.The idea that its an outrage because it happened to a conservative who preaches abstinence is silly.

The way it relates to Gore is this.His goofball wife and him were in charge of the PMRC.They wanted a ban on music that touted the use of drugs and drinking.Their kid turned out to be a drug addict.If you cant see the similarity,then your even more blind then I thought.Shit happens,parents do the best they can,in the end its up to the kid what they do.Do you do everything your parents told you to or avoid everything they told you to avoid.Why would Palin be any different?

Lurker would only have been happy is she had killed her baby. And if she would have killed her baby, than he would have called Palin a hypocrite.

Lurker is a typical pro-abortion fanatic.

Dos Equis · « **Reply #35 on:** March 12, 2009, 01:44:45 PM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on March 12, 2009, 01:36:49 PM

Ok,so the kid got knocked up.Millions do it everyday.In fact Id be willing to bet money that at least 60% of democratic voters are people that either had kids out of wedlock or are kids that were born out of wedlock.In fact,I believe the story is Obama was born out of wedlock.The idea that its an outrage because it happened to a conservative who preaches abstinence is silly.

The way it relates to Gore is this.His goofball wife and him were in charge of the PMRC.They wanted a ban on music that touted the use of drugs and drinking.Their kid turned out to be a drug addict.If you cant see the similarity,then your even more blind then I thought.Shit happens,parents do the best they can,in the end its up to the kid what they do.Do you do everything your parents told you to or avoid everything they told you to avoid.Why would Palin be any different?

Good points. Anyone who raises (or has raised kids) knows that all you can do is teach them, set boundaries, and set a good example, but at the end of the day the kids make their own choices as they become adults.

24KT · « **Reply #36 on:** March 12, 2009, 03:08:59 PM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on March 12, 2009, 06:26:11 AM

Why would ANY sex ed be taught in school?Shouldnt parents be the ones to handle that?I dont want some pervert teacher teaching my son their twisted views.

Teachers aren't there to teach their twisted views, ...they're there to disseminate the curriculum.

It's done so that parents with twisted views like Sarah Palin, don't unintentionally foist more people onto the welfare roles, due to the ignorance of their ineffective strategies. When this happens, many adamant about not having sex education in schools are often the first to scream about having to support others.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #37 on:** March 12, 2009, 03:12:57 PM »

I don't care what you say... If Bristol Palin was not the daughter of the governor, her ass would be in a trailer on welfare right now.

24KT · « **Reply #38 on:** March 12, 2009, 03:15:57 PM »

Quote from: shootfighter1 on March 12, 2009, 08:41:37 AM

Cheney's daughter may be a lesbian but thats not a crime or a drain on society.

You haven't been listening to Alan Keyes lately, ...he tossed his daughter out of the house because she was gay,
...or for that matter, most of the GOP. The way they go on about homosexuality, ...it might as well be.

Quote

The subject line doesn't make sense. I'm sure the Palin family will use their resources to take care of the child.

Hahahahah Lolololol... the same family that billed the tax payers for flying her uninvited kids across the country?
The same family that bills the state per diems for working at home rather than in the gov mansion?
The same family that has milked every dime of tax payer money they can get their hands on for their personal use?
Forgive me for laughing, ...but somehow keeping her kids & grandkids off the public purse is not something I foresee anytime soon.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #39 on:** March 12, 2009, 03:21:31 PM »

Quote from: jaguarenterprises on March 12, 2009, 03:15:57 PM

You haven't been listening to Alan Keyes lately, ...he tossed his daughter out of the house because she was gay,
...or for that matter, most of the GOP. The way they go on about homosexuality, ...it might as well be.

Isn't making laws against homosexuality costing us (the taxpayer) money? Isn't that a "drain" on society?

Dos Equis · « **Reply #40 on:** March 12, 2009, 10:55:57 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on March 12, 2009, 03:21:31 PM

Isn't making laws against homosexuality costing us (the taxpayer) money? Isn't that a "drain" on society?

What "laws against homosexuality" are you talking about?

24KT · « **Reply #41 on:** March 13, 2009, 12:11:25 AM »

Quote from: Beach Bum on March 12, 2009, 10:55:57 PM

What "laws against homosexuality" are you talking about?

How can someone so seemingly uninformed about current affairs even consider themselves qualified to post on this board, let along moderate it? This is a serious question.

Dos Equis · « **Reply #42 on:** March 13, 2009, 12:22:09 AM »

Quote from: jaguarenterprises on March 13, 2009, 12:11:25 AM

How can someone so seemingly uninformed about current affairs even consider themselves qualified to post on this board, let along moderate it? This is a serious question.

Yawn.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #43 on:** March 13, 2009, 06:27:20 AM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on March 12, 2009, 01:36:49 PM

They wanted a ban on music that touted the use of drugs and drinking.Their kid turned out to be a drug addict.If you cant see the similarity,then your even more blind then I thought.

You have absolutely no sense of what hypocrisy truly is do you? Ah... being a Republican it must be a foreign concept until you find yourself slapped over the head by it.

Perhaps if the kid turned out to be a drug addicted MUSICIAN the hypocrisy would be the same as Palin's and the GOPs "Family Values" stance.

But since he didn't, it isn't.

On the bright side however, your illogical rants are still amusing to me.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #44 on:** March 13, 2009, 06:28:10 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 12, 2009, 01:42:03 PM

Lurker would only have been happy is she had killed her baby. And if she would have killed her baby, than he would have called Palin a hypocrite.

Lurker is a typical pro-abortion fanatic.

Not really. She got knocked up out of wedlock. Hey, nothing wrong with that after all her own mother did the same. Despite preaching against it.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #45 on:** March 13, 2009, 06:42:07 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on March 13, 2009, 06:28:10 AM

Not really. She got knocked up out of wedlock. Hey, nothing wrong with that after all her own mother did the same. Despite preaching against it.

You mean like our president and your messiah?

?

shootfighter1 · « **Reply #46 on:** March 13, 2009, 07:05:03 AM »

Bickering is pointless. Teen pregnancy is a part of society. Regardless if it occurs in a dem or rep family, there is often negative consequences and both sides have a responsibility to publicize the dangers of teenage pregnancy to the mother, the child, and the tax payor. It is ironic that teenage pregnancy happens in a family that preaches family values but it happens. They still have every right, and responsibility to promote family values and warn against the hardship of teenage pregnancy.

What anti-homosexuality law are you refering to? I know of no such law.

shootfighter1 · « **Reply #47 on:** March 13, 2009, 07:09:45 AM »

Interestingly, I was at a conference last week and met two ladies from Alaska. Four of us went to lunch, the two from Alaska, a doc from South side Chicago and myself. The Chicago doc asked them what they thought of Palin. Both said they loved her and she has done great things for the state. They said that was a majority consensus from where they lived. He then asked if they thought she was qualified to become VP....they were less convinced but said she did such a great job as gov that they believed in her. Interesting to get their perspectives.
The Chicago doc didn't agree about her being well qualified (same with me). He also said Chicago politics is every bit as bad as we hear, and then some. He said the mayor and most of the politicians are corrupt and its cut-throat but he said they have all the power and are unlikely to be voted out because there is a big network. I think he was a centrist democrat.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #48 on:** March 13, 2009, 08:23:33 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 13, 2009, 06:42:07 AM

You mean like our president and your messiah??

Especially since his parents were trying to set the moral course for the rest of the country with a "Family Values" platform and "leading by example."

BM OUT · « **Reply #49 on:** March 13, 2009, 09:16:56 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on March 13, 2009, 08:23:33 AM

Especially since his parents were trying to set the moral course for the rest of the country with a "Family Values" platform and "leading by example."

Just like the Gores put themselves up as the protector of all thats right in the world and their little scum bag kid turned out to be a junkie.Thats irony.By the way dildo,I dont like republicans,they are better then libs by miles,but I vote libertarian.Nice try though jerkoff.