Author Topic: Levrone Ownage in Most Muscular Pose! (Read 9895 times)

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #75 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:08:55 AM »

those are the arms bigbobs are sayin are amazing.....
$:-\$
big yes ....
quality and shape.... not great

Tombo · « **Reply #76 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:12:31 AM »

graceful arabian features

Cap · « **Reply #77 on:** March 15, 2009, 08:08:56 AM »

If Nasser had such an elite brain then why did he mess up his body with too much synthol?

Hulkster · « **Reply #78 on:** March 15, 2009, 08:23:51 AM »

because he didn't have an elite brain?

England_1 · « **Reply #79 on:** March 15, 2009, 10:26:35 AM »

talk about a crock of sh*t

Hulkster · « **Reply #80 on:** March 15, 2009, 11:09:01 AM »

Quote from: cheftim on March 15, 2009, 10:30:32 AM

Thats a great photo.

most photos of 99 ronnie are

he was that damn good

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #81 on:** March 15, 2009, 01:39:38 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 15, 2009, 11:09:01 AM

most photos of 99 ronnie are

he was that damn good

Most are photoshopped

bigbobs · « **Reply #82 on:** March 15, 2009, 04:47:34 PM »

Quote from: alnassak on March 14, 2009, 03:15:51 AM

.

What does posting a SOLO picture of Kevin Levrone doing an MM with horrible symmetry (left arm bigger than right) and with uneven and "squishy," narrow pecs and a rolley eye emoticon prove?

bigbobs · « **Reply #83 on:** March 15, 2009, 04:48:26 PM »

Quote from: LurkyLurker on March 14, 2009, 03:35:46 PM

Best back ever, and yet not one full on back shot in the whole routine? Odd that he wouldn't want to show off such a strong bodypart.

Where have I said he had the best back ever? Post 95, his back was one of the best onstage (top 6), just not compared to the top 2-3 guys.

bigbobs · « **Reply #84 on:** March 15, 2009, 04:51:01 PM »

Quote from: BIG_STI on March 15, 2009, 06:30:12 AM

So Bobs you have any pics of them turned around from the same competition? or are you to scared to post pics of your hero getting destroyed.

The MM pose was considered Levrone's trademark pose, that's why I posted the comparison. One can post the two back shots, but then it would also only be fair to post all mandatories, and Nasser beats Levrone in the majority

bigbobs · « **Reply #85 on:** March 15, 2009, 04:52:05 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on March 15, 2009, 07:08:55 AM

those are the arms bigbobs are sayin are amazing.....
$:-\$
big yes ....
quality and shape.... not great

Better shape and separation in the biceps/triceps than Dorian and Levrone

nicky.smth · « **Reply #86 on:** March 15, 2009, 04:53:39 PM »

Quote from: Power Rod on March 13, 2009, 02:52:10 PM

fixed.

haha, bigbobs would love that

Earl1972 · « **Reply #87 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:21:17 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on March 15, 2009, 04:51:01 PM

The MM pose was considered Levrone's trademark pose, that's why I posted the comparison. One can post the two back shots, but then it would also only be fair to post all mandatories, and Nasser beats Levrone in the majority

no he doesn't, nasser was LevrOWNED more often then not throughout their careers

nasser beating Mr. Levrone when he tried to be too big (96 - 99) does not make him a better bodybuilder

E

QuakerOats · « **Reply #88 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:22:37 PM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on March 15, 2009, 07:21:17 PM

no he doesn't, nasser was LevrOWNED more often then not throughout their careers

nasser beating Mr. Levrone when he tried to be too big (96 - 99) does not make him a better bodybuilder

E

sorry Earl, you know you're one of my favorite posters here but Kevin is getting owned by Nasser in that shot at the top of the thread, you're an honest guy even you have to admit that.

Earl1972 · « **Reply #89 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:26:28 PM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on March 15, 2009, 07:22:37 PM

sorry Earl, you know you're one of my favorite posters here but Kevin is getting owned by Nasser in that shot at the top of the thread, you're an honest guy even you have to admit that.

i disagree and at their best Mr. Levrone wins

what year is that pic, 96? I would not be as much of a Levroneite if he always looked the way he looked from 96 - 99

i prefer 92 - 95 and 2000

E

QuakerOats · « **Reply #90 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:30:38 PM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on March 15, 2009, 07:26:28 PM

i disagree and at their best Mr. Levrone wins

what year is that pic, 96? I would not be as much of a Levroneite if he always looked the way he looked from 96 - 99

i prefer 92 - 95 and 2000

E

yeah my point was just based on that pic, i'd say Nasser and Kevin are VERY close on the all time best list with Nasser SLIGHTLY besting him.

Earl1972 · « **Reply #91 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:37:38 PM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on March 15, 2009, 07:30:38 PM

yeah my point was just based on that pic, i'd say Nasser and Kevin are VERY close on the all time best list with Nasser SLIGHTLY besting him.

you could argue that nasser was better for about 3 years but a career is measured over many years

shaun alexander was arguably the best running back in the nfl for 3 years, he then broke down and he won't even get a sniff of the hall of fame while players with longer careers like curtis martin and jerome bettis will get in even though they were never considered the best, they were consistent

Mr. Levrone placed 2nd at his first Olympia in 92, 10 years later he placed 2nd again, the same show where nasser got something like 15th

E

bigbobs · « **Reply #92 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:42:11 PM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on March 15, 2009, 07:37:38 PM

you could argue that nasser was better for about 3 years but a career is measured over many years

shaun alexander was arguably the best running back in the nfl for 3 years, he then broke down and he won't even get a sniff of the hall of fame while players with longer careers like curtis martin and jerome bettis will get in even though they were never considered the best, they were consistent

Mr. Levrone placed 2nd at his first Olympia in 92, 10 years later he placed 2nd again, the same show where nasser got something like 15th

E

Yes, but we're not discussing who had the longest career, but who was better at their respective bests. Either way, I believe Nasser is and you believe Levorne is - not a big deal...we can agree to disagree. Cheers.

P.S. The threads I make like this are not directed at level-headed guys like you, its more meant for the few that melt at any pro-Nasser thread that's made or start posting the lame soiled underwear comments

QuakerOats · « **Reply #93 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:43:52 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on March 15, 2009, 07:42:11 PM

Yes, but we're not discussing who had the longest career, but who was better at their respective bests. Either way, I believe Nasser is and you believe Levorne is - not a big deal...we can agree to disagree. Cheers.

P.S. The threads I make like this are not directed at level-headed guys like you, its more meant for the few that melt at any pro-Nasser thread that's made or start posting the lame soiled underwear comments

agreed, both were TREMENDOUS bodybuilders and obviously both were among the all time greats but like you i give a slight edge to Nasser and that's saying a lot because Levrone was an absolutely inceredible bodybuilder.

Earl1972 · « **Reply #94 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:47:34 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on March 15, 2009, 07:42:11 PM

Yes, but we're not discussing who had the longest career, but who was better at their respective bests. Either way, I believe Nasser is and you believe Levorne is - not a big deal...we can agree to disagree. Cheers.

P.S. The threads I make like this are not directed at level-headed guys like you, its more meant for the few that melt at any pro-Nasser thread that's made or start posting the lame soiled underwear comments

their careers weren't that much different in length

i'm not getting angry, if anything i really don't care much anymore because Mr. Levrone hasn't competed in nearly 6 years and i'm getting fed up with the sport overall, i can only dwell on the past for so long $:-\$

E

Hulkster · « **Reply #95 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:57:02 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on March 15, 2009, 04:52:05 PM

Better shape and separation in the biceps/triceps than Dorian and Levrone

but being better than dorian in the arm department is nothing.

almost every pro in the 90's had better arms than him..

QuakerOats · « **Reply #96 on:** March 15, 2009, 07:58:40 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 15, 2009, 07:57:02 PM

but being better than dorian in the arm department is nothing.

almost every pro in the 90's had better arms than him..

boom.

Hulkster · « **Reply #97 on:** March 15, 2009, 08:03:06 PM »

boom!

Hulkster · « **Reply #98 on:** March 15, 2009, 08:04:18 PM »

bigbobs · « **Reply #99 on:** March 15, 2009, 08:42:20 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 15, 2009, 07:57:02 PM

but being better than dorian in the arm department is nothing.

almost every pro in the 90's had better arms than him..

They're also clearly beating Levrone's in the pic.

But according to ND Dorian had the best set of arms all due to his forearms, regardless of how weak his biceps/triceps were