Author Topic: Phil Heath is Better than Flex? Say What!! (Read 7084 times)

Parker · « **on:** March 24, 2009, 05:53:12 PM »

Here is a short clip of Flex Wheeler's Hardbody video. It's part of the intro.
this is for those who say Phil is better than Flex. Take a look at him at his best.

QuakerOats · « **Reply #1 on:** March 24, 2009, 05:54:05 PM »

nowhere near as good as Flex but still an incredible bodybuilder.

Parker · « **Reply #2 on:** March 24, 2009, 05:59:22 PM »

Another, from Mass Construction...

swilkins1984 · « **Reply #3 on:** March 24, 2009, 06:11:11 PM »

Not yet but he will be if he keeps going like he is.

Parker · « **Reply #4 on:** March 24, 2009, 06:17:20 PM »

Quote from: swilkins1984 on March 24, 2009, 06:11:11 PM

Not yet but he will be if he keeps going like he is.

Nada, as Phil gets bigger, his waist gets wider. His obliques are already shwoing the "growing strains". Flex looked better at a lighter bodyweight.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #5 on:** March 24, 2009, 06:30:51 PM »

Quote from: Parker on March 24, 2009, 05:53:12 PM

Here is a short clip of Flex Wheeler's Hardbody video. It's part of the intro.
this is for those who say Phil is better than Flex. Take a look at him at his best.

Ha ha ha ha ha Phil better than Flex , Flex is in a league all his own

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #6 on:** March 24, 2009, 06:32:45 PM »

Just an exceptional bodybuilder

swilkins1984 · « **Reply #7 on:** March 24, 2009, 06:34:39 PM »

Quote from: Parker on March 24, 2009, 06:17:20 PM

Nada, as Phil gets bigger, his waist gets wider. His obliques are already shwoing the "growing strains". Flex looked better at a lighter bodyweight.

I don't think Phil will get any bigger. His waist now is slightly bigger than Dexter's which is 30" onstage. Plus Phil outweighs Dexter by probably 15lbs. The goal I think is to refine like Silvio has. More back detail and bring the Ironman conditioning can win him the Olympia.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #8 on:** March 24, 2009, 06:35:29 PM »

I guess I'll go against the grain here and say that Phil Heath is better.

Relentless · « **Reply #9 on:** March 24, 2009, 07:18:14 PM »

Flex had the best genetics for shape in the history of the sport.

bigj2k3 · « **Reply #10 on:** March 24, 2009, 07:23:37 PM »

Flex is like Nasser with less mass.

Parker · « **Reply #11 on:** March 24, 2009, 07:25:29 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on March 24, 2009, 06:32:45 PM

Just an exceptional bodybuilder

Those back shots, show that nobody today had the detail that not only he had but all the rest of the top six (excluding Nasser) had in the 90's.

look at the freaking detailing, and the detail of the tris. No wonder Flex was dying after the Arnold Classic.

Dballn247 · « **Reply #12 on:** March 24, 2009, 08:19:39 PM »

Flex's Christmas tree at the 93 olympia was ridiculous.

Wiggs · « **Reply #13 on:** March 24, 2009, 11:27:08 PM »

Flex was perfect.

240 is Back · « **Reply #14 on:** March 24, 2009, 11:35:49 PM »

Which bodybuilder was a better person? I think that is important too.

bic_staedtler · « **Reply #15 on:** March 24, 2009, 11:37:25 PM »

..this must be what if feels like to get old.

FLEX WHEELER....SO much better than Heath. No comparison...at all.

Heath has time though. But I'd say that Flex has him right from the beginning...just a genetic wonder. Really would have been nice to see him take a Mr O title during this current lack of talent.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #16 on:** March 25, 2009, 01:09:09 AM »

Phil will never... EVER EEEEEVER be better than Flex Wheeler.

That is all.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #17 on:** March 25, 2009, 01:19:06 AM »

Quote from: Relentless on March 24, 2009, 07:18:14 PM

Flex had the best genetics for shape in the history of the sport.

this is true...
i love phil..
but wheeeler is bette by far

Schmoe Buster · « **Reply #18 on:** March 25, 2009, 01:26:23 AM »

Ken Wheeler, ninja warrior with kung fu grip = one of the best bodybuilders of all time

Phil Heath, KFC and anadrol = one of the best bodybuilder competing today

Phil is good but Ken is better

io856 · « **Reply #19 on:** March 25, 2009, 01:27:47 AM »

sometimes I wonder how it was even possible for flex to achieve the physique he did...

its like perfection a sculptor could not even create

alnassak · « **Reply #20 on:** March 25, 2009, 03:49:18 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on March 24, 2009, 06:35:29 PM

I guess I'll go against the grain here and say that Phil Heath is better.

X1000000000

just_a_pilgrim · « **Reply #21 on:** March 25, 2009, 04:26:03 AM »

Heath isn't better but his condition is more consistent. He came close last year, should have been 2nd at the O and was close to Dexter. He could definately win it depends upon Wolf showing up ready. I think there is too much oil in his arms to pass a physique like Flex's but he isn't far off.

RZA · « **Reply #22 on:** March 25, 2009, 04:49:59 AM »

Saying that Heath is better than Flex is ridiculous. Flex in '93 was unbeatable by anyone except a '93 Dorian and not for aesthetic reasons. He just had the best genetics ever with the smallest brain ever.

clued-up · « **Reply #23 on:** March 25, 2009, 04:55:57 AM »

Quote from: io856 on March 25, 2009, 01:27:47 AM

sometimes I wonder how it was even possible for flex to achieve the physique he did...

its like perfection a sculptor could not even create

do you really think flex had that much to do with it? a sculptor can do whatever he wants.. a bodybuilder can only do what their genetics allow.

bodybuilding simply comes down to genetics.. the best genetics win.

kyomu · « **Reply #24 on:** March 25, 2009, 04:58:12 AM »

Quote from: james001 on March 25, 2009, 04:55:57 AM

do you really think flex had that much to do with it? a sculptor can do whatever he wants.. a bodybuilder can only do what their genetics allow.

bodybuilding simply comes down to genetics.. the best genetics win.

and the will power to polish that genetic.