Author Topic: Flex Magazine Stupid List of the best 20 Backs ever!! (Read 30822 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #150 on:** April 12, 2009, 03:35:26 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on April 12, 2009, 03:22:04 PM

you said you drink my milkshake. Yeah, you sure "own" me. I hope you don't go around 'owning' people in real life by telling them gay shit. $:-\$

wtf are you talking about? This thread is about the best backs of all-time. I was fine with Flex ranking Ronnie #1 but nooooo, you had to interject your homosexual fan boy obsession into this thread.

yawn

Quote

you said you drink my milkshake. Yeah, you sure "own" me. I hope you don't go around 'owning' people in real life by telling them gay shit. $:-\$

Exactly I know what I said , YOU changed it to suit your underlying homosexual desires and at the end of the day YOU still have MY name in your sig and you even rename and saved pics of me to your harddrive lol I own you for all of the reasons I stated not just that one ,

owned

Quote

wtf are you talking about? This thread is about the best backs of all-time. I was fine with Flex ranking Ronnie #1 but nooooo, you had to interject your homosexual fan boy obsession into this thread.

And I posted a pic of Dorian and Ronnie in a back shot that's not gay fan-boy , that's on topic , owned again

Quote

yawn

Same article it states MANY feel even today Dorian has the best back , and there are other polls to this day that say Dorian has a better back , oppppsssss owned yet again third time is a charm , 3 strikes and fan-boy Neo is out Wink

run along puppy the novelty of toying with you of over

Hulkster · « **Reply #151 on:** April 12, 2009, 03:36:26 PM »

Quote

the pic is from 1998 where Flex magazine voted Dorian best back of the 20th century

hindsight's 20/20.

at the time dorian was THE back in bb.

ronnie had just won his first O. people were writing him off as a one time Mr. O at the time.

years later, not only did Ronnie's back improve over his 1998 appearance, but its quite clear that Ronnie's back was much better than dorians.

hence with the proper perspective (ie both men's careers essentially over) Ronnie wins the poll easily.

suck it nuthuggers

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #152 on:** April 12, 2009, 03:37:23 PM »

Quote from: Mr.1derful on April 12, 2009, 03:08:49 PM

Hey Huckster, this pic is a little dark and hard to see,...would you mind?

Ha ha ha ha I recall Hulkster & pumpster posting that pic and bragging about how he owns Yates lol in a contest where he was a very distant 6th

Hulkster · « **Reply #153 on:** April 12, 2009, 03:39:43 PM »

FIRST and second...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #154 on:** April 12, 2009, 03:39:59 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 12, 2009, 03:36:26 PM

hindsight's 20/20.

at the time dorian was THE back in bb.

ronnie had just won his first O. people were writing him off as a one time Mr. O at the time.

years later, not only did Ronnie's back improve over his 1998 appearance, but its quite clear that Ronnie's back was much better than dorians.

hence with the proper perspective (ie both men's careers essentially over) Ronnie wins the poll easily.

suck it nuthuggers

excuses , excuses , Dorian's back is still better to this day and there are many other polls besides Flex and even in the Flex article they state MANY feel Dorian has a better back lol just like Ronnie said lol owned by your own hero

keep posting sharpened pics lol

Hulkster · « **Reply #155 on:** April 12, 2009, 03:40:51 PM »

keep claiming all ronnie pics are sharpened..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #156 on:** April 12, 2009, 03:42:21 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 12, 2009, 03:39:43 PM

FIRST and second...

LMFAO that's the only place Ronnie beats Dorian in fan-boy comparisons , FYI Dorian has a longer torso than Ronnie yet in the fab-boy comparisons he doesn't , Dorian lats insert lower than Ronnies , in fan-boy comparisons they don't lol

this is reality NO fan-boys needed

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #157 on:** April 12, 2009, 03:45:40 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 12, 2009, 03:40:51 PM

keep claiming all ronnie pics are sharpened..

Who said all? please find that quote liar

not all just a LOT of the 99 screencaps , the 98 back shot the 2003 MM shall I continue?

Miss Demeanor · « **Reply #158 on:** April 12, 2009, 03:46:33 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 12, 2009, 09:17:30 AM

^

is that dorian standing beside Ronnie?

hahahahha

dorian would look just as pitiful standing next to that.

With all respect, Hulkster, that comparison doesn't best make your point.

I have always thought Dorian easily had a superior lat spread while the Olympia-winning Ronnie could have a more appealing rear-biceps pose (at least, before he got hurt and/or too heavy, like in 2004 and on). Picking between them for "best back" is next to impossible though, little as it means*, I'd probably take Dorian by a slight margin.

*These polls y'all talk about don't mean anything. Most of the little boys voting in these things were probably pre-pubescent when Dorian was winning. Of COURSE they'll favor Ronnie; that's only natural, especially after Ronnie's showing in 2003.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #159 on:** April 12, 2009, 03:49:32 PM »

Quote from: Miss Demeanor on April 12, 2009, 03:46:33 PM

With all respect, Hulkster, that comparison doesn't best make your point.

I have always thought Dorian easily had a superior lat spread while the Olympia-winning Ronnie could have a more appealing rear-biceps pose (at least, before he got hurt and/or too heavy, like in 2004 and on). Picking between them for "best back" is next to impossible though, little as it means*, I'd probably take Dorian by a slight margin.

*These polls y'all talk about don't mean anything. Most of the little boys voting in these things were probably pre-pubescent when Dorian was winning. Of COURSE they'll favor Ronnie; that's only natural, especially after Ronnie's showing in 2003.

Great post ! but alas you can't talk sense into the senseless $:-\$

Hulkster · « **Reply #160 on:** April 12, 2009, 04:04:50 PM »

Quote

Dorian lats insert lower than Ronnies

yes, into his superthick keg construction worker waist..

lovemonkey · « **Reply #161 on:** April 12, 2009, 04:09:37 PM »

Dorian does have a very impressive back and is wider than Coleman with more striations. To say that Ronnie wins easily is a bit foolish perhaps.

Hulkster · « **Reply #162 on:** April 12, 2009, 04:46:56 PM »

Quote

To say that Ronnie wins easily is a bit foolish perhaps

no more foolish than ND claiming that the 98 back shot is worked, the 2003 mm is worked, and most of the 99 screenshots are worked..

the only reason he claims this is because they show Ronnie was just that much better.

all of us look and see that Ronnie was simply better. its called progress.

ND and Co. look, see and figure out some excuse...

Hulkster · « **Reply #163 on:** April 12, 2009, 04:48:53 PM »

ps check out Ronnie 99's rear lat spread.

its quite clear why he placed first in the poll..dorian never came close to this. his thick waist wouldn't allow it..

<cue ND claiming this pic is worked too..

>

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #164 on:** April 12, 2009, 05:28:30 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 12, 2009, 04:46:56 PM

no more foolish than ND claiming that the 98 back shot is worked, the 2003 mm is worked, and most of the 99 screenshots are worked..

the only reason he claims this is because they show Ronnie was just that much better.

all of us look and see that Ronnie was simply better. its called progress.

ND and Co. look, see and figure out some excuse...

]

I bet you that 2003 MM is worked I'll bet you my account if I'm wrong I'll delete mine and if you're wrong delete yours deal?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #165 on:** April 12, 2009, 05:30:00 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 12, 2009, 04:48:53 PM

ps check out Ronnie 99's rear lat spread.

its quite clear why he placed first in the poll..dorian never came close to this. his thick waist wouldn't allow it..

<cue ND claiming this pic is worked too.. >

You know what ones are worked because I call you on them yet you continue to post them lol

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #166 on:** April 12, 2009, 05:32:41 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 12, 2009, 04:04:50 PM

yes, into his superthick keg construction worker waist..

It doesn't matter NO matter how much weight Ronnie puts on he can never lengthen his muscles , his lats will never be as low as Dorians neither will his traps and teres and infraspinatus , etc , so when you post your fan-boy comparisons you might want to take that into consideration lol then again noting you post is reality based , it's only in these fantasy comparisons that Ronnie beats Dorian because in reality he couldn't get the job done

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #167 on:** April 12, 2009, 05:36:45 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 12, 2009, 04:48:53 PM

ps check out Ronnie 99's rear lat spread.

its quite clear why he placed first in the poll..dorian never came close to this. his thick waist wouldn't allow it..

<cue ND claiming this pic is worked too.. >

He never came close to that? You're right he was way to complete to come close to that mess lol what happens when the judges ask for one foot placed back to flex the calf? nothing happens when Ronnie does this , Ronnie has a very good rear latspread , Dorian's is better , more complete , less flaws , better balance & proportion , better density & dryness , better sweep of the lats , lower lats , it's simply better everywhere

lovemonkey · « **Reply #168 on:** April 12, 2009, 05:46:35 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 12, 2009, 05:36:45 PM

He never came close to that? You're right he was way to complete to come close to that mess lol what happens when the judges ask for one foot placed back to flex the calf? nothing happens when Ronnie does this , Ronnie has a very good rear latspread , Dorian's is better , more complete , less flaws , better balance & proportion , better density & dryness , better sweep of the lats , lower lats , it's simply better everywhere

I do think Dorian actually has a better back but I gotta advise you(for what it's worth lol) not to overuse those infamous b&w pics... The lightning used is almost too beneficial and does not seem to accurately recreate how he actually looked. If you look at any other photos of him ever he has never been able to duplicate it which makes me believe that it was basically some lucky shots with awesome lightning.

CastIron · « **Reply #169 on:** April 12, 2009, 05:48:34 PM »

Best back EVER..

Hulkster · « **Reply #170 on:** April 12, 2009, 05:51:49 PM »

Quote from: lovemonkey on April 12, 2009, 05:46:35 PM

I do think Dorian actually has a better back but I gotta advise you(for what it's worth lol) not to overuse those infamous b&w pics... The lightning used is almost too beneficial and does not seem to accurately recreate how he actually looked. If you look at any other photos of him ever he has never been able to duplicate it which makes me believe that it was basically some lucky shots with awesome lightning.

exactly. they were very well done controlled shots from a professional photographer with proper lighting to produce the desired shadows, contrast etc.

when dorian was onstage, he got owned quite a bit:

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #171 on:** April 12, 2009, 05:56:17 PM »

Quote from: lovemonkey on April 12, 2009, 05:46:35 PM

I do think Dorian actually has a better back but I gotta advise you(for what it's worth lol) not to overuse those infamous b&w pics... The lightning used is almost too beneficial and does not seem to accurately recreate how he actually looked. If you look at any other photos of him ever he has never been able to duplicate it which makes me believe that it was basically some lucky shots with awesome lightning.

lucky shots? both of those are different years , lighting was nothing special confirmed by Kevin Horton the photographer when posed with the same question he balked at the idea he wouldn't look as impressive in color or in person , and he was to duplicate that?

these are from 1992 NO lucky lighting or anything special just gym shots

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #172 on:** April 12, 2009, 05:58:53 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 12, 2009, 05:51:49 PM

exactly. they were very well done controlled shots from a professional photographer with proper lighting to produce the desired shadows, contrast etc.

when dorian was onstage, he got owned quite a bit:

lmfao coming from the guy who constantly uses ENHANCED pictures and was busted numerous times doing so by Kevin Horton and did you miss the part where he said Yates has a better back? and you're agreeing lol moron

and to quote the photographer the picture was technically terrible

owned again moron

Hulkster · « **Reply #173 on:** April 12, 2009, 06:06:05 PM »

Quote

and to quote the photographer the picture was technically terrible

of course anyone with a brain can see that is not true.

saying that is a great way to stroke your own ego.

after all, if you say those famous shots are 'technically terrible' imagine how good your 'good' shots must be..

its quite clear what the intention of that comment was...to make himself look better.

lovemonkey · « **Reply #174 on:** April 12, 2009, 06:07:02 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 12, 2009, 05:56:17 PM

lucky shots? both of those are different years , lighting was nothing special confirmed by Kevin Horton the photographer when posed with the same question he balked at the idea he wouldn't look as impressive in color or in person , and he was to duplicate that?

these are from 1992 NO lucky lighting or anything special just gym shots

Well I see your point and those shots are impressive (very impressive!) as well but come on, you can even see his damn bacne in detail here, the lightning was very beneficial.