I beg to differ old chasp.
You may as well just go get the 'Warren commision" & try & convince us that 'Oswald' shot 'JFK' from a window in the book depository building, with a 'single bolt action 6.5 mm caliber Carcano rifle', a shot that 'Verille Zaitsev' himself could not have made !!
I mean, come on.
That is going to be virtually impossible, & you know it.
'Judicial systems' work on never having seen a crime take place, however, you do get to review an amount of evidence & make up your mind to a level deemed 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
That is our task at hand.
We are not far of 10 years down the road, there has been so much diss-info pumped out there it's not funny.
You have to play detective, & go back to basics.
Who had to most to gain out of the events of that day ??
Incorrect, nothing of the sort my man, you are going to need to do better than this.
Your ball.
I proved through Steve Jones own writing that he is wrong.
http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/WhyIndeedDidtheWorldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdfNotice that the molten metal (probably not steel alone; see discussion below) was flowing down
in the rubble pile early on; so it is not the case that the molten metal pools formed due to
subterranean fires after the collapses.
The NIST report refuted this. Now Steven Jones agrees with the NIST report.
NIST concluded that the source of the molten material was aluminum alloys from the aircraft, since these are known to melt between 475 degrees Celsius and 640 degrees Celsius (depending on the particular alloy), well below the expected temperatures (about 1,000 degrees Celsius) in the vicinity of the fires. Aluminum is not expected to ignite at normal fire temperatures and there is no visual indication that the material flowing from the tower was burning.
Pure liquid aluminum would be expected to appear silvery. However, the molten metal was very likely mixed with large amounts of hot, partially burned, solid organic materials (e.g., furniture, carpets, partitions and computers) which can display an orange glow, much like logs burning in a fireplace. The apparent color also would have been affected by slag formation on the surface.
You can keep believing in it. I hear that Santa and the Easter Bunny are looking for believers too.
As for me I believe that 19 hijackers and 4 planes were used that day. That there were some warning signs, but the CIA and FBI couldn't operate together because of their organizational rules and that wire tapping of American residents wasn't allowed because the government didn't have a strong enough case.
This all came out during the Moussaoui trial.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zacarias_MoussaouiOn August 16, 2001, Moussaoui was arrested by Harry Samit of the FBI and INS agents in Minnesota and charged with an immigration violation[15]. Materials itemized when he was arrested included a laptop computer, two knives, flight manuals pertaining to Boeing's 747 aircraft, a flight simulator computer program, fighting gloves and shin guards, and a computer disk with information about crop dusting.[15]
Some agents worried that his flight training had violent intentions, so the Minnesota bureau tried to get permission (sending over 70 emails in a week) to search his laptop, but they were turned down.[16] FBI agent Coleen Rowley made an explicit request for permission to search Moussaoui's personal rooms. This request was first denied by her superior, Deputy General Counsel Marion "Spike" Bowman, and later rejected based upon FISA regulations (amended after 9/11 by the USA Patriot Act). Several further search attempts similarly failed.
FBI watchdog Sen. Chuck Grassley, Republican-Iowa, later wrote to FBI Director Robert Mueller:
If the application for the FISA warrant had gone forward, agents would have found information in Moussaoui's belongings that linked him both to a major financier of the hijacking plot working out of Germany, and to a Malaysian al-Qaida boss who had met with at least two other hijackers while under surveillance by intelligence officials.
I agree with Ozmo on the whole JFK thing.
However this is the same deflect technique that seems all the rage with truthers. Move to another almost plausible conspiracy then try to link it to the one that you are arguing.
