Author Topic: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are...... (Read 13256 times)

buffdnet · « **Reply #50 on:** April 21, 2009, 06:29:19 AM »

Quote

The irony is...I'm not the one bringing it up....guys like YOU are.

who are also guys that purchase show tickets, mags and supps.
you're a dumbshit yes man
at best

Chick · « **Reply #51 on:** April 21, 2009, 06:42:14 AM »

Quote from: buffdnet on April 21, 2009, 06:29:19 AM

who are also guys that purchase show tickets, mags and supps.
you're a dumbshit yes man
at best

LOL....trust me,....the overwhelming majority of people that post on this site, have never been to a show, purchased tickets, or in any way, shape or form supported the BB community....much less ever seen the inside of a gym.

scram

Option D · « **Reply #52 on:** April 21, 2009, 06:44:27 AM »

Quote from: pillowtalk on April 21, 2009, 01:55:01 AM

Epic Homophobic reaction

DK II · « **Reply #53 on:** April 21, 2009, 06:45:06 AM »

Quote from: Chick on April 21, 2009, 06:42:14 AM

LOL....trust me,....the overwhelming majority of people that post on this site, have never been to a show, purchased tickets, or in any way, shape or form supported the BB community....much less ever seen the inside of a gym.

scram

You're an idiot, Chick.

It's always the same here, you say BB is gay or that BB are drug abusing criminals and it means that you don't work out.

I'd rather assume that it's the other way round, all the gay Schmoes that go to the Expos and "support" the community never work out, but the guys that actually do work out turn away because of all the gay porn going on in BB.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #54 on:** April 21, 2009, 06:45:41 AM »

so are you proposing attire standards. well, make a proposal that includes all contestants(female and male). one way is having everyone wear the same type...no variations. a standard outfit for women and men. perhaps award an exclusive to a startup company for a standard competition suit. personally i don't give a shit about what people wear on event day or how ridiculous they look.

Dballn247 · « **Reply #55 on:** April 21, 2009, 06:46:52 AM »

Someone posted that it was an Auction with Gays bidding. Funny shit.

lovemonkey · « **Reply #56 on:** April 21, 2009, 06:49:00 AM »

Quote from: Chick on April 21, 2009, 06:15:57 AM

Actually...you just made my argument. You're exactly right...it was OTHER factors that led to the boom...none having to do with the size of trunks (which were the same as today)

If anyone thinks adding two inches of fabric will translate into money, they're smoking crack

No what I was trying to say is that it's impossible to draw any conclusions on whether bigger/smaller trunks made the difference. So it wouldn't hurt to try, right?

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #57 on:** April 21, 2009, 06:49:37 AM »

Quote from: Chick on April 21, 2009, 06:15:57 AM

Actually...you just made my argument. You're exactly right...it was OTHER factors that led to the boom...none having to do with the size of trunks (which were the same as today)

If anyone thinks adding two inches of fabric will translate into money, they're smoking crack

NO but it would translate into a little bit of respect and dignity. I mean you never answered my question. Are these thongs and itty bitty bikinis required by the IFBB or simply "encouraged"

?? LOL. How did it feel as you yourself had to stand up there in a thong Chick? Did you feel less of a man or more of a chick?

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #58 on:** April 21, 2009, 06:51:02 AM »

Quote from: Dballn247 on April 21, 2009, 06:46:52 AM

Someone posted that it was an Auction with Gays bidding. Funny shit.

you wouldn't be surprised at the number of child predators who go to teen cheerleading events. the vast overwhelming majority are heterosexual. hope this helps.

Option D · « **Reply #59 on:** April 21, 2009, 06:51:14 AM »

Quote from: Chick on April 21, 2009, 06:42:14 AM

LOL....trust me,....the overwhelming majority of people that post on this site, have never been to a show, purchased tickets, or in any way, shape or form supported the BB community....much less ever seen the inside of a gym.

scram

I do think the thong thing is wack. And i have been to many shows. Compteted and been to a gym many times. Bob youre cool, but come on man dont go there. Just because people dont agree with somestuff (its just the thong pics and the grapefruit fucking that goes unchecked that gets me) you cant discount their place in the bb community. People have a right to criticize the sport they like. Im not callin you an idiot like others tho. Youre still cool in my book (im sure it dont mean shit to you anyway

)

wavelength · « **Reply #60 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:01:58 AM »

Competitive bodybuilding is a very small part of bodybuilding. The general public (including most people who workout = build their bodies) will always find the current form of competitive bodybuilding awkward. I don't see how attending a show would change that. Of course it's brought up constantly - because it's awkward, not because people bringing it up are gay and don't workout. That's like saying if I bring up the topic of not liking the Village People means that I am gay and have never actually listened to any form of music at all.

webcake · « **Reply #61 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:08:42 AM »

Gotta love the typical bb'er reply "you don't even workout"

DK II · « **Reply #62 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:10:42 AM »

Quote from: webcke on April 21, 2009, 07:08:42 AM

Gotta love the typical bb'er reply "you don't even workout"

Yes, as if that would do anything.

It means nothing to the people who don't workout and people who do workout just give a shit about it.

Option D · « **Reply #63 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:11:32 AM »

Quote from: webcke on April 21, 2009, 07:08:42 AM

Gotta love the typical bb'er reply "you don't even workout"

Right...in debate..isnt that a argumentative fallacy.."argument from authority"

You state a fact and the other side discounts it by saying "what authority do you have to speak"

its a fact none the less reguardless of where it is comming from.

Blockhead · « **Reply #64 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:12:16 AM »

Quote from: calfzilla on April 21, 2009, 02:33:22 AM

Gotta keep the gay customer base happy cuz they are the ones with the $$$.

Bingo! ALL of the publications such as IM, Flex, M&F and especially MD know that majority of their readers and buyers of their magazine are ho mos so they try to appeal to them first. I mean, come on... FLEX in the 90's. Tiny cootchie cutter jean shorts on, purple socks, work boots and a torn flannel shirt on hese guys in he gym?

- Block!

Option D · « **Reply #65 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:14:07 AM »

Quote from: TheBlockHead on April 21, 2009, 07:12:16 AM

Bingo! ALL of the publications such as IM, Flex, M&F and especially MD know that majority of their readers and buyers of their magazine are ho mos so they try to appeal to them first. I mean, come on... FLEX in the 90's. Tiny cootchie cutter jean shorts on, purple socks, work boots and a torn flannel shirt on hese guys in he gym?

- Block!

lmao....dont forget the cutoff jean shirts with the daisy dukes (on guys) and work boots...look like one of them homo calenders

DK II · « **Reply #66 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:16:58 AM »

Quote from: big_mal on April 21, 2009, 07:14:07 AM

lmao....dont forget the cutoff jean shirts with the daisy dukes (on guys) and work boots...look like one of them homo calenders

Why the fuck do these guys dress up like the village people or wear lion costumes and stuff in the first place?

I think FLEX and MD have a huge readership of middle aged closet homos that have to hide their passion from their poor wives. Here's the money. If you make it less gay, these poeple jump off, if you make it too gay, the stop buying as well.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #67 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:19:39 AM »

Quote from: TheBlockHead on April 21, 2009, 07:12:16 AM

Bingo! ALL of the publications such as IM, Flex, M&F and especially MD know that majority of their readers and buyers of their magazine are ho mos so they try to appeal to them first. I mean, come on... FLEX in the 90's. Tiny cootchie cutter jean shorts on, purple socks, work boots and a torn flannel shirt on hese guys in he gym?

- Block!

let's face it the queens have the cash for the 7 dollar infomercials FLEX and MD produce. it's a consumer driven market. the white trash buying the Pampers at the check out line ain't plopping down the cash for a magazine with a steroid freak male wearing daisy dukes. but the metrosexual will

Chick · « **Reply #68 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:22:34 AM »

Quote from: MuscleMcMannus on April 21, 2009, 06:49:37 AM

NO but it would translate into a little bit of respect and dignity. I mean you never answered my question. Are these thongs and itty bitty bikinis required by the IFBB or simply "encouraged"?? LOL. How did it feel as you yourself had to stand up there in a thong Chick? Did you feel less of a man or more of a chick?

I dont know...I've never worn a thong. On stage or otherwise.

The smaller trunks have evolved as the criteria in BB changed...in the old days, we wore trunks to COVER our asses, not show them off.

If the judges stopped rewarding glute striations over shape, or symmetry or proportion or muscularity...then there would be no need to show them off.

Option D · « **Reply #69 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:23:57 AM »

Quote from: Chick on April 21, 2009, 07:22:34 AM

I dont know...I've worn a thong. On stage or otherwise.

The smaller trunks have evolved as the criteria in BB changed...in the old days, we wore trunks to COVER our asses, not show them off.

If the judges stopped rewarding glute striations over shape, or symmetry or proportion or muscularity...then there would be no need to show them off.

Best Explaination ever in life from you Bob...Im proud of you bro...

hipolito mejia · « **Reply #70 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:25:09 AM »

Quote from: Chick on April 21, 2009, 06:15:57 AM

Actually...you just made my argument.

If anyone thinks adding two inches of fabric will translate into money, they're smoking crack

Translation : "Our main concern its the money that comes straight from the schmoe pocket, to hell with dignity or the right image"

CalvinH · « **Reply #71 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:26:00 AM »

So where are the pics of bb's in thongs

DK II · « **Reply #72 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:26:10 AM »

Quote from: Chick on April 21, 2009, 07:22:34 AM

I dont know...I've worn a thong. On stage or otherwise.

The smaller trunks have evolved as the criteria in BB changed...in the old days, we wore trunks to COVER our asses, not show them off.

If the judges stopped rewarding glute striations over shape, or symmetry or proportion or muscularity...then there would be no need to show them off.

ahahahaha, Chick is evading the question and giving the bad card on to someone else like always!

Now it's the judges that are gay? These people KNOW what the IFBB wants i.e. more money from the gay community.

Option D · « **Reply #73 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:27:33 AM »

Quote from: CalvinH on April 21, 2009, 07:26:00 AM

So where are the pics of bb's in thongs

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #74 on:** April 21, 2009, 07:28:23 AM »

Quote from: DonkeyKong on April 21, 2009, 07:26:10 AM

ahahahaha, Chick is evading the question and giving the bad card on to someone else like always!

Now it's the judges that are gay? These people KNOW what the IFBB wants i.e. more money from the gay community.

of course it's about money, it's a business not a charity lol