Author Topic: Female slaughters defenseless elephant with bow for a bet (Read 13393 times)

calfzilla · « **Reply #200 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:29:34 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 05:28:11 PM

I don't hunt , never hunted and have no desire to hunt , but I respect people who do. you don't understand your place on the food chain.

Exactly.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #201 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:32:27 PM »

Quote from: MindSpin on May 12, 2009, 05:18:35 PM

They should, at least, admit that they enjoy killing animals for the mere fun of it, instead of trying to cover it up with nonsense like "population control" & "feeding starving Africans".

Again you keep insisting people are killing for fun where are you coming up with this? you haven't answered as of yet. because she killed and didn't eat it? if she eat it would it change anything? I mean where does it stop? does she only have to take a bite or eat to her fill? what amount is okay for you? isn't it enough it didn't go to waste?

lax · « **Reply #202 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:34:21 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 05:32:27 PM

Again you keep insisting people are killing for fun where are you coming up with this? you haven't answered as of yet. because she killed and didn't eat it? if she eat it would it change anything? I mean where does it stop? does she only have to take a bite or eat to her fill? what amount is okay for you? isn't it enough it didn't go to waste?

If she did not eat it
why did she kill it?
this is the question, ND

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #203 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:36:06 PM »

Quote from: lax on May 12, 2009, 05:34:21 PM

If she did not eat it
why did she kill it?
this is the question, ND

The question was answered , for a challenge and nothing more. as the top of the food chain we can do that .

lax · « **Reply #204 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:37:56 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 05:36:06 PM

The question was answered , for a challenge and nothing more. as the top of the food chain we can do that .

Does not make it an honorable thing
not at all
no honor

MindSpin · « **Reply #205 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:42:13 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 05:36:06 PM

The question was answered , for a challenge and nothing more. as the top of the food chain we can do that .

So, you think it's okay to inflict harm on another living creature, simply because it makes for a good challenge

The Master · « **Reply #206 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:43:08 PM »

Quote from: MindSpin on May 12, 2009, 05:42:13 PM

So, you think it's okay to inflict harm on another living creature, simply because it makes for a good challenge

Yeah, what the hell, why not?

lax · « **Reply #207 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:43:36 PM »

Quote from: MindSpin on May 12, 2009, 05:42:13 PM

So, you think it's okay to inflict harm on another living creature, simply because it makes for a good challenge

like I said
no honor here

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #208 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:43:46 PM »

Quote from: lax on May 12, 2009, 05:37:56 PM

Does not make it an honorable thing
not at all
no honor

Honor? she put herself in grave danger at the least the elephants could have killed her ...that's to be respected she took a massive chance in doing so that's honorable , I'm not a huge fan of sport hunting but in the end nothing goes to waste so in the end it's still a win/win situation

lax · « **Reply #209 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:45:12 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 05:43:46 PM

Honor? she put herself in grave danger at the least the elephants could have killed her ...that's to be respected she took a massive chance in doing so that's honorable , I'm not a huge fan of sport hunting but in the end nothing goes to waste so in the end it's still a win/win situation

no
she CHOSE to put herself in an inane position

scratch what I said earlier

Stupid AND no honor

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #210 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:49:16 PM »

Quote from: MindSpin on May 12, 2009, 05:42:13 PM

So, you think it's okay to inflict harm on another living creature, simply because it makes for a good challenge

While I'm not a fan of sport hunting she put herself in harms way , it could have went two ways , she came out on top and let's say the meat didn't go to the villagers , some other creatures would have been well fed so in the end it's a win/win situation .

And I agree with medical testing on another living creature regardless if it inflicts harm if it benefits man .

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #211 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:51:13 PM »

Quote from: lax on May 12, 2009, 05:45:12 PM

no
she CHOSE to put herself in an inane position

scratch what I said earlier

Stupid AND no honor

Yes she did choose to put herself in that position but it doesn't change the fact that there was serious risk involved it's more honorable than shooting from 1000 yards in the back of a Range Rover

lax · « **Reply #212 on:** May 12, 2009, 05:54:57 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 05:51:13 PM

Yes she did choose to put herself in that position but it doesn't change the fact that there was serious risk involved it's more honorable than shooting from 1000 yards in the back of a Range Rover

I choose to disagree, respectfully

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #213 on:** May 12, 2009, 06:02:00 PM »

Quote from: lax on May 12, 2009, 05:54:57 PM

I choose to disagree, respectfully

Thanks you

lax · « **Reply #214 on:** May 12, 2009, 06:02:50 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 06:02:00 PM

Thanks you

don't mention it, proper decorum is often lost these days

Parker · « **Reply #215 on:** May 12, 2009, 06:04:03 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 05:43:46 PM

Honor? she put herself in grave danger at the least the elephants could have killed her ...that's to be respected she took a massive chance in doing so that's honorable , I'm not a huge fan of sport hunting but in the end nothing goes to waste so in the end it's still a win/win situation

The elephants were desensitived to humans. So they thought, "Hey another human in our mist", that's the equivalent of walking amongst tame deer and then shooting one.

I hope that she comes up against a Cape Buffalo and we read that she was maimed. Cape Buffalo are no joke, and they will remember you and follow you.

lax · « **Reply #216 on:** May 12, 2009, 06:10:31 PM »

Quote from: Parker on May 12, 2009, 06:04:03 PM

The elephants were desensitived to humans. So they thought, "Hey another human in our mist", that's the equivalent of walking amongst tame deer and then shooting one.

I hope that she comes up against a Cape Buffalo and we read that she was maimed. Cape Buffalo are no joke, and they will remember you and follow you.

No shit. Is that true?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #217 on:** May 12, 2009, 06:12:50 PM »

Quote from: Parker on May 12, 2009, 06:04:03 PM

The elephants were desensitived to humans. So they thought, "Hey another human in our mist", that's the equivalent of walking amongst tame deer and then shooting one.

I hope that she comes up against a Cape Buffalo and we read that she was maimed. Cape Buffalo are no joke, and they will remember you and follow you.

Those particular elephants? it would explain how she got so close but even then look at the circus elephants and those in zoos who trample their trainers , there is always an element of danger with any wild animal.

dkf360 · « **Reply #218 on:** May 12, 2009, 10:58:28 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 06:12:50 PM

Those particular elephants? it would explain how she got so close but even then look at the circus elephants and those in zoos who trample their trainers , there is always an element of danger with any wild animal.

Not in this instance.

Game animals are not abused by humans like circus animals and they are desensitized to humans as they feed them as well.

Mars · « **Reply #219 on:** May 12, 2009, 11:29:06 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 02:26:22 PM

You admitted you eat meat you're a hypocrite she just had the balls to do what you're paying other people to do , she didn't eat the meat big deal others did nothing ( presumably ) went to waste another animal dead in the cycle of life , as always life goes on.

youre giving me a headache, like several people already said, the whole point is killing an animal for the sake of pleasure, celebrating this cowardly act while the animal is slowly tortured to death.
you really think the fat american was a single moment in danger? get a grip dude.

BatistaSL · « **Reply #220 on:** May 13, 2009, 01:20:48 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 12, 2009, 06:12:50 PM

Those particular elephants? it would explain how she got so close but even then look at the circus elephants and those in zoos who trample their trainers , there is always an element of danger with any wild animal.

Yes..There is..But when with a herd of elephants who are used to humans, Elephants normally ignore the human. They might be curious some times but not aggressive.

She can draw a big bow, That should be respected.

Kill a tiger with a gun,That should be respected

BUT Killing an elephant for a bet? FUCK NO.

An Isolated lonely elephant is entirely different though.

webcake · « **Reply #221 on:** May 13, 2009, 01:22:23 AM »

I don't like hunting animals, but i would like to have a couple of animal heads hanging on the wall.

kiwiol · « **Reply #222 on:** May 13, 2009, 01:24:31 AM »

Even though it has nothing to do with this topic, I'd like to add that "The Ghost and the Darkness" is one of the best movies ever made.

webcake · « **Reply #223 on:** May 13, 2009, 01:26:57 AM »

Quote from: kiwiol on May 13, 2009, 01:24:31 AM

Even though it has nothing to do with this topic, I'd like to add that "The Ghost and the Darkness" is one of the best movies ever made.

I remember that one. Might have to watch it again soon.

BatistaSL · « **Reply #224 on:** May 13, 2009, 01:41:01 AM »

RE post sorry