Author Topic: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...  (Read 25856 times)

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #50 on: May 29, 2009, 12:28:47 AM »
The second pic you posted is NOT from the '80 Olympia, but the '74 Olympia.

yep. In 80 his mm was not nearly as impressive as that.

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #51 on: May 29, 2009, 12:43:01 AM »
Like I care, knucklehead.  ::)

ovious that you care about little

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9372
  • .......
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #52 on: May 29, 2009, 01:03:41 AM »
The second pic you posted is NOT from the '80 Olympia, but the '74 Olympia.
You're right, my mistake then.
Post edited.

kawaks

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 914
  • My Two Cents
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #53 on: May 29, 2009, 01:38:22 AM »
1. she's a dud root and been told so
2. she's been told shes a golddigger
3. she's never been loved
4. daddy issues LOLOLOLOL

Should this be reported as a hate crime?

Tombo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4725
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #54 on: May 29, 2009, 04:38:12 AM »
Should this be reported as a hate crime?

what i said or what she said?

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7300
  • Getbig!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #55 on: May 29, 2009, 04:45:48 AM »
If Arnold was so "bad" in 80,

Show me a pic of who was too "good" not to win then,

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7300
  • Getbig!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #56 on: May 29, 2009, 05:10:43 AM »
Arnold needed the 1980 olympia to boost his name for hollywood, rather than being the 1975 Mr Olympia has been turned actor, he wanted a fresh title.


End of Thread


Not really, he was trainning for the movie Conan but the shooting was (moved) postponed to 1981,

When Arnold learned the news he was like "all this trainning for nothing?"

The rest is history.

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #57 on: May 29, 2009, 05:39:26 AM »
Not really, he was trainning for the movie Conan but the shooting was (moved) postponed to 1981,

When Arnold learned the news he was like "all this trainning for nothing?"

The rest is history.

wrong, asian

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32180
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #58 on: May 29, 2009, 06:46:30 AM »
no matter what yr or decade arnold is weiders poster boy ,he gets a few covers every yr with same pictures,he gets cover to promote his movies,ARNOLD WAS KING THEN AND STILL IS.

eddiebubble

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 63
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #59 on: May 29, 2009, 09:30:35 AM »
......bullshit.








Obvious face lift. Check the stretched back smooth face with the high brow against the ancient neck and hand. He's as fake as Fuck and always has been.

Tarantula157

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #60 on: July 02, 2009, 03:03:36 AM »
Mods delete this thread immediately.

It's been proven Arnold was the clear winner with Dickerson close second.





More...

Tarantula157

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #61 on: July 02, 2009, 03:14:28 AM »
Comparisons...

Tarantula157

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #62 on: July 02, 2009, 03:22:09 AM »
More comparisons...

Tarantula157

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #63 on: July 02, 2009, 03:41:11 AM »
Too bad... >:(

Tarantula157

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #64 on: July 02, 2009, 03:44:23 AM »
...And the winner is...

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #65 on: July 02, 2009, 03:47:31 AM »
this thread is proving that Lax is Moosejay even more.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #66 on: July 02, 2009, 04:07:15 AM »
this thread is proving that Lax is Moosejay a little homo even more.

fixed

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #67 on: July 02, 2009, 04:11:15 AM »
this thread is proving that Lax is Moosejay even more.

don't know him

but you still waste time lifting weights
with a regressing physique
in need of hiding your melon with a fright helmet

when zI see you I will slap some sense into you

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #68 on: July 02, 2009, 04:36:21 AM »
don't know him

but you still waste time lifting weights
with a regressing physique
in need of hiding your melon with a fright helmet

when zI see you I will slap some sense into you
Can you swear to your nation(United State OF America) that You are not Mike Dusa?

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #69 on: July 02, 2009, 04:38:46 AM »
don't know him

but you still waste time lifting weights
with a regressing physique
in need of hiding your melon with a fright helmet

when zI see you I will slap some sense into you
Yet, I am double size than you lil Mike.
Hope this help. ;)


lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #70 on: July 02, 2009, 04:51:00 AM »
Yet, I am double size than you lil Mike.
Hope this help. ;)



the time for celebrating yourself
is almost at an end
kyomew

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #71 on: July 02, 2009, 04:53:33 AM »
the time for celebrating yourself
is almost at an end
kyomew
OK I ask you again.
Can you swear to your nation(United State OF America) that You are not Mike Dusa?

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #72 on: July 02, 2009, 04:59:23 AM »
OK I ask you again.
Can you swear to your nation(United State OF America) that You are not Mike Dusa?

if it suits you
I can and I do

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #73 on: July 02, 2009, 05:00:14 AM »
lax is a little homo.

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #74 on: July 02, 2009, 05:01:46 AM »
if it suits you
I can and I do
Are you stupid? Why I am something to do with your truth?

So what is the REAL truth enough to swear to your beloved nation called UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?