I'm just curious, because I happened onto the thread ...
... even if someone does work in a flower shop, what in the wild world of sports does that have to do with the validity of his/her argument? LOL.
I think this whole Dorian versus Ronnie stuff has played a BIG role in ruining this site. Both were great champions. Anyone who says either at his best would dominate, smoke, overwhelm, outclass or over-shadow the other is kidding themselves. Dorian and Ronnie at their respective bests would've been truly incredible ... and I can say that because I have SEEN both of those men at or near their best (or very close to, if 1995 counts for Dorian).
If nothing else, could everyone please cut down on the hyperbole? We have enough insane exaggeration at Getbig without talking about either Ronnie or Dorian as if either was anything less than amazing during their Olympia wins. (Yeah, yeah. You can say Dorian was flat in 1996 and had a bloated stomach in '97; you can just as easily say Ronnie was smooth in 2000 and 2001, and "too small" in 2002.)
Who cares? "Uncle Joe" obviously didn't fix any of those shows. I defy any one of you to show how he or anyone else did.