translation= I just tore you a new asshole.
I find it interesting to notice that you ideolize dumbfucks who are borderline schizoid individuals with no skills or real talents at all and who are potential threats to society. Especially because you are the very same kind of individual yourself. I guess that's why you defend them .
It goes hand in hand with the fact that you constantly pretend nobody understands how great and intelectually superior you are even if you have no diploma no job and are basically just a parasite to society.
Again, you are using a fallacious argument, a categorical syllogism. I have not made this discussion about me in any shape or fashion. YOU have. I have only interjected that what Peter Paul is doing, is performing a linguistic and visual art. I have seen similar acts many times, particularly with digital installations. I do see value in what he does with some of his Socratic word plays and his intention to break the mundane
He starts by breaking the habitual framework of the brain or interruption of habitual framework.
He initially breaks thought patterns and alters their state. This "surprise" initiates confusion in his audience. The audience is now receptive (negatively, positively or even indecisive) and the brain will demand clarification and is expectant in receiving more "stimuli", in this case Peter Paul`s persona. The audience`s brains are now broken free from their habitual response responsiveness and are totally confused, resulting in somewhat of a crash.
This technique is highly common with street performers and improv actors. Sacha Baron Cohen being a complete master of this habitual breakdown of his audience`s brain.
