Author Topic: Franken on Judiciary  (Read 2420 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66543
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Franken on Judiciary
« on: June 30, 2009, 05:33:46 PM »
Great.  The SNL mildly funny comedian helping decide who sits on the U.S. Supreme Court.  Brilliant.   ::)

Franken on Judiciary
Posted: 05:44 PM ET

From CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney

(CNN) – Minnesota Sen.-elect Al Franken is set to have a busy first few weeks on the job.

The Democrat said Tuesday he's been told he will serve on the Judiciary Committee — the panel which will hear testimony from Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotmayor on her appointment to the high court.

Franken told reporters Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid also told him he will serve on the Senate Committee of Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, and the Senate Special Committee on Aging.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/

AE

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 509
  • Retribution is Certain
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2009, 05:57:19 PM »
Great.  The SNL mildly funny comedian helping decide who sits on the U.S. Supreme Court.  Brilliant.   ::)
...
Better than that grade B movie actor who was President in the 80s and nominated the Supreme Court candidates.  ::)

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2009, 06:52:58 PM »
Better than that grade B movie actor who was President in the 80s and nominated the Supreme Court candidates.  ::)

Al Frankenstein couldn't hold Reagan's jock. you see Ronald Reagan actually liked America

I'm old enough to remember the debacle that was Carter, and how infinatly better things were when Reagan was POTUS

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66543
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2009, 07:25:10 PM »
Al Frankenstein couldn't hold Reagan's jock. you see Ronald Reagan actually liked America

I'm old enough to remember the debacle that was Carter, and how infinatly better things were when Reagan was POTUS



lol.  Dude you have the funniest pictures.   :D

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2009, 07:55:35 PM »
Great.  The SNL mildly funny comedian helping decide who sits on the U.S. Supreme Court.  Brilliant.   ::)

Franken outworked Coleman, plain and simple.

never in a million years should norm have lost

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2009, 04:58:06 AM »
Franken outworked Coleman, plain and simple.

never in a million years should norm have lost
minnesota isnt alabama

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2009, 07:16:47 AM »
All the cry babies here are making me laugh.

The voters made their choice - deal with it.

Isn't that what the right says when they win?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41766
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2009, 07:20:09 AM »
All the cry babies here are making me laugh.

The voters made their choice - deal with it.

Isn't that what the right says when they win?

Yup, and they are now going to have to live with the marxist policies of Obama/Pelosi/Reid. 

I cant wait until the home inspectors show up to their homes and these fools blame Bush. 

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2009, 07:24:40 AM »
There's too many changes increasing government power, increasing taxation and limiting the choices and freedoms of our citizens to just deal with it.  I understand Franken won the election but we must be vocal critics and get these far left people out of Washington.  I don't want far right wingers, nor far left wingers deciding the fate of our country.  Having Franken in the senate is appauling.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2009, 07:41:19 AM »
Yup, and they are now going to have to live with the marxist policies of Obama/Pelosi/Reid. 

I cant wait until the home inspectors show up to their homes and these fools blame Bush. 

LOL - you should really get back on your meds

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2009, 07:42:08 AM »
There's too many changes increasing government power, increasing taxation and limiting the choices and freedoms of our citizens to just deal with it.  I understand Franken won the election but we must be vocal critics and get these far left people out of Washington.  I don't want far right wingers, nor far left wingers deciding the fate of our country.  Having Franken in the senate is appauling.

no problem

just win some elections

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41766
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2009, 07:44:29 AM »
LOL - you should really get back on your meds

Oh really???????

Do you want me to give you list of marxist policies and piositions that this Admn is pursuing with the blessing of the Dems in Congress?

I know you dont want to believe it because you are invested emotionally in Obama's success (which will never happen), but the reality is that Obama is pursuing a marxist agenda, with the blessing of the congeress..   

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41766
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #12 on: July 01, 2009, 07:45:44 AM »
no problem

just win some elections

Schiff is only 3 points behind Dodd already in CT!

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2009, 08:14:25 AM »
LOL - you should really get back on your meds
X 2 and back on the rocker granny

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41766
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2009, 08:18:07 AM »
X 2 and back on the rocker granny

I'm 34. 

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #15 on: July 01, 2009, 08:33:39 AM »

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #16 on: July 01, 2009, 08:35:04 AM »
jacko was 50

Bertrand Russell was 91.
I hate the State.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #17 on: July 01, 2009, 11:47:56 AM »
Oh really???????

Do you want me to give you list of marxist policies and piositions that this Admn is pursuing with the blessing of the Dems in Congress?

I know you dont want to believe it because you are invested emotionally in Obama's success (which will never happen), but the reality is that Obama is pursuing a marxist agenda, with the blessing of the congeress..   

I have no emotional attachment either way.

you're the one who is hysterical.

List whatever you'd like

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66543
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #18 on: July 01, 2009, 12:20:17 PM »
Franken outworked Coleman, plain and simple.

never in a million years should norm have lost

O Rly?  And how do you know this? 

Even if Franken "outworked Coleman," that has nothing to do with the fact a lousy comedian will help select Supreme Court Justices, and every other federal judge, for at least the next six years. 

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #19 on: July 01, 2009, 02:50:42 PM »
O Rly?  And do you know this? 

Even if Franken "outworked Coleman," that has nothing to do with the fact a lousy comedian will help select Supreme Court Justices, and every other federal judge, for at least the next six years. 

Actually, comdedians, garbage workers, and a host of other people you feel are "unqualified" helped to select the judges... by voting for who they wanted to win their districts elections.

You know... The people who voted for Obama and every other Democrat in Congress right now.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66543
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #20 on: July 01, 2009, 02:52:27 PM »
Actually, comdedians, garbage workers, and a host of other people you feel are "unqualified" helped to select the judges... by voting for who they wanted to win their districts elections.

You know... The people who voted for Obama and every other Democrat in Congress right now.

Oh the straw man argument.   :)

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #21 on: July 01, 2009, 02:57:56 PM »
Oh the straw man argument.   :)

I don't see anything "straw man" about it... People knew what they were voting for.

You don't think it's everyone's choice? I do.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66543
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #22 on: July 01, 2009, 02:58:52 PM »
I don't see anything "straw man" about it... People knew what they were voting for.

You don't think it's everyone's choice? I do.

Was referring to your comments about who I believe is qualified to serve. 

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #23 on: July 01, 2009, 03:28:31 PM »
More votes were cast then people who voted. Coleman screwed up his approach to the post election fight. They should have conducted a run-off.
L

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Franken on Judiciary
« Reply #24 on: July 01, 2009, 03:44:19 PM »
Was referring to your comments about who I believe is qualified to serve. 

You didn't even read the statement then... because I didn't say qualified to "serve".

I said qualified to help select the Judges... Because they voted for the people selecting them.

Please go re-read my post.