Author Topic: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot  (Read 26661 times)

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #25 on: August 30, 2009, 06:51:24 PM »
 ;)

saucetradomous

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2967
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2009, 06:52:41 PM »
;)

What was that dudes full name again? 

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2009, 06:54:48 PM »
Ahahahahah Nasser's back in 94 was wider than Lou's at 320 pounds ?? and you came to this conclusion how? your delusion knows no bounds

offfff... wider means you have to put in consideration the rest of him.. i mean to see his lats in relation with his other body parts and not separately.. sure nasser's was wider and so he had a better V taper.. most of lou's weight was because he was very tall and not because he was the biggest.. same as paul dillett who was tall and big but his back lacked a lot of size to go with the rest of him.. in 1993 dorian "looked" bigger than lou but he was much lighter so don’t tell me lou was 320 pounds and that was it!!..

here you can see that at its best nasser's back was better than lou's..

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2009, 06:56:47 PM »
What was that dudes full name again? 
Dont know man maybe Holmes?

noworries

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4788
  • Train Heavy or Go Home
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2009, 07:51:47 PM »
He stated in People magazine that he was paid $1,500.00 per week for the hulk.

of course, to many of you here, that is likely life-changing $.

Back in the 70's that a ton of money.  That isn't that bad in today money
No Worries 4 me

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7231
  • Getbig!
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #30 on: August 30, 2009, 08:18:21 PM »
He could have been Mr.O from 76 to probably 1990 and retire at just 38 years of age, just imagine the muscle maturity he would have developed had he competed at his best years non stop .....He never reached his potential....This was coming after 17 years !


BOOM

keanu

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2116
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #31 on: August 30, 2009, 08:25:25 PM »
He could have been Mr.O from 76 to probably 1990 and retire at just 38 years of age, just imagine the muscle maturity he would have developed had he competed at his best years non stop .....He never reached his potential....This was coming after 17 years !


BOOM

Lou would never, ever touch Haney who was far too complete. Lou looked good in the 70's. He could have won from 76 until '83 (Samir was on fire in 83)if he came in ripped and balanced. In the 90's he competed 50 lbs heavier but the weight wasn't balanced. He had calf implants, a back that lacked thickness/ detail, small bi's and tri's, and shoulders. His waist had gotten much thicker competing at 300+. He looked like a mess. Take a look at the double-bi front and back.

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #32 on: August 30, 2009, 08:34:47 PM »
Lou was the uncrowned Mr. Olympia while filming Hercules in 1982. Had he not stopped bodybuilding 1975, he would have been indestructible by the time Haney came around. He had at least 5" on Haney and a ton of weight.

MULTIPLE TIMES uncrowned champ right there.

Eric2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2889
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #33 on: August 30, 2009, 08:34:54 PM »
Big Louie is a douche bag.
h

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #34 on: August 30, 2009, 09:53:13 PM »
offfff... wider means you have to put in consideration the rest of him.. i mean to see his lats in relation with his other body parts and not separately.. sure nasser's was wider and so he had a better V taper.. most of lou's weight was because he was very tall and not because he was the biggest.. same as paul dillett who was tall and big but his back lacked a lot of size to go with the rest of him.. in 1993 dorian "looked" bigger than lou but he was much lighter so don’t tell me lou was 320 pounds and that was it!!..

here you can see that at its best nasser's back was better than lou's..


Lou, based on the pics, does seem to have a decided edge in detail and at over 300 pounds has the advantage in width, no doubt.  Nasser actually looks decent there, I'll concede that. 

TechnoViking

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4518
  • Too weird to live, too rare to die...----HST
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #35 on: August 30, 2009, 09:54:44 PM »
Cue someone to post up the Tom Platz Quad shot with Lou looking like a tiny tit...

dyslexic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7676
  • baddoggy
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #36 on: August 30, 2009, 10:49:24 PM »

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #37 on: August 31, 2009, 12:24:57 AM »
Lou, based on the pics, does seem to have a decided edge in detail and at over 300 pounds has the advantage in width, no doubt.  Nasser actually looks decent there, I'll concede that. 

nasser's arms and shoulders are "relatively" bigger and his v taper is better.. then take a look at their lower bodies (hams/calves) to know that nasser takes is better in this pose hands down..

nodeal

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 732
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #38 on: August 31, 2009, 12:30:02 AM »
I wonder how much Lou got paid to appear in the new Hulk?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79323
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #39 on: August 31, 2009, 12:47:46 AM »
offfff... wider means you have to put in consideration the rest of him.. i mean to see his lats in relation with his other body parts and not separately.. sure nasser's was wider and so he had a better V taper.. most of lou's weight was because he was very tall and not because he was the biggest.. same as paul dillett who was tall and big but his back lacked a lot of size to go with the rest of him.. in 1993 dorian "looked" bigger than lou but he was much lighter so don’t tell me lou was 320 pounds and that was it!!..

here you can see that at its best nasser's back was better than lou's..



I don't see where you can claim his back is better and wider .  and we're not talking pound-for-pound either you think by making them the same height that means his back is just as good?  ::) they're not the same height , Nasser in 1994 wasn't wider than Ferrigno maybe when he was much heavier but then his back suffered for

In 94 he had a similar back neither have enough of a significant advantage like Dorian over the other but I think Lou is edging him out especially in the traps and Lou's back is more crisp


lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #40 on: August 31, 2009, 04:48:22 AM »
Back in the 70's that a ton of money.  That isn't that bad in today money

for being on one of the top tv shows?

that sucks then and now

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #41 on: August 31, 2009, 05:00:27 AM »
Nobody wanted his autograph back then lol

Nobody really cares for it today.  :D

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #42 on: August 31, 2009, 05:04:59 AM »
What was that dudes full name again? 

bobby sly

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11685
  • Getbig!
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #43 on: August 31, 2009, 05:05:18 AM »
Lou would never, ever touch Haney who was far too complete. Lou looked good in the 70's. He could have won from 76 until '83 (Samir was on fire in 83)if he came in ripped and balanced. In the 90's he competed 50 lbs heavier but the weight wasn't balanced. He had calf implants, a back that lacked thickness/ detail, small bi's and tri's, and shoulders. His waist had gotten much thicker competing at 300+. He looked like a mess. Take a look at the double-bi front and back.

Story would have been different and his physique too, Had he never retired.


WOOOOSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHh

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #44 on: August 31, 2009, 05:11:05 AM »
bobby sly

could someone please explain briefly whta that pic of Sly with the gun is all about?

RxBandit

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 455
  • Team Germany approved.
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #45 on: August 31, 2009, 05:14:27 AM »
...no question.

Playboy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11315
  • If the bar ain't bending, you're just pretending
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #46 on: August 31, 2009, 05:20:24 AM »
People can talk shit all they want but Ferrigno was and always will be one of the best in the business. To this day he's still in good shape for his age while everyone else has floundered.

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #47 on: August 31, 2009, 06:02:22 AM »
Some great shots here:



spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #48 on: August 31, 2009, 06:08:04 AM »
insane


spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #49 on: August 31, 2009, 06:09:22 AM »