offfff... wider means you have to put in consideration the rest of him.. i mean to see his lats in relation with his other body parts and not separately.. sure nasser's was wider and so he had a better V taper.. most of lou's weight was because he was very tall and not because he was the biggest.. same as paul dillett who was tall and big but his back lacked a lot of size to go with the rest of him.. in 1993 dorian "looked" bigger than lou but he was much lighter so don’t tell me lou was 320 pounds and that was it!!..
here you can see that at its best nasser's back was better than lou's..
I don't see where you can claim his back is better and wider . and we're not talking pound-for-pound either you think by making them the same height that means his back is just as good?
they're not the same height , Nasser in 1994 wasn't wider than Ferrigno maybe when he was much heavier but then his back suffered for
In 94 he had a similar back neither have enough of a significant advantage like Dorian over the other but I think Lou is edging him out especially in the traps and Lou's back is more crisp