Author Topic: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot  (Read 26665 times)

Playboy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11315
  • If the bar ain't bending, you're just pretending
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #75 on: September 01, 2009, 12:27:26 PM »
Dillet and Nasser are piles of shitty oil... Do not compare their physiques with Lou's...
Exactly.

brooklynbruiser

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1782
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #76 on: September 01, 2009, 12:48:36 PM »
Awesome Lou was shot? WTF? Who shot him? Was it someone bitching over autograph prices? What is vintage bodybuilding turning into?

PPIP* Lou.

* Penny-pinch in purgatory.
Almost always, yes.

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #77 on: September 01, 2009, 02:07:17 PM »
 ;)

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #78 on: September 01, 2009, 02:51:46 PM »
Awesome Lou was shot? WTF? Who shot him? Was it someone bitching over autograph prices? What is vintage bodybuilding turning into?

PPIP* Lou.

* Penny-pinch in purgatory.
::)

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #79 on: September 01, 2009, 07:19:44 PM »
Exactly.

and what about lou's enhanced calves?.. at least both nasser and dillett had great quads and calves while lou's whole lower body was relatively weak..

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #80 on: September 01, 2009, 07:23:05 PM »
and what about lou's enhanced calves?.. at least both nasser and dillett had great quads and calves while lou's whole lower body was relatively weak..

In that regard, I have no idea what Lou was thinking.  Why did he feel the need to resort to implants?  Calves don't matter, look at Ronnie.  :-X

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #81 on: September 01, 2009, 07:33:31 PM »
He stated in People magazine that he was paid $1,500.00 per week for the hulk.

of course, to many of you here, that is likely life-changing $.
its enough for a ferrari payment  ::)

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #82 on: September 01, 2009, 07:58:23 PM »
In that regard, I have no idea what Lou was thinking.  Why did he feel the need to resort to implants?  Calves don't matter, look at Ronnie.  :-X

ronnie is black so he has an excuse 8)

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #83 on: September 02, 2009, 02:46:05 AM »
ND, this pic. of nasser and kevin had been scanned by you and was posted here few months ago.. could you plz tell me from which contest it's??.. it seems to be mr. o. 96 but i am not sure.. thx..

Gino30

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1326
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #84 on: September 02, 2009, 04:40:59 AM »
no not better than nasser of 1994.. post nasser's back from the NOC 94 and you will see.. also nasser's lats were wider..

i still see lou's back was small for the rest of his upper body.. his relatively narrow lats was taking a lot from his FLS pose..


the pakistani terrorist

Playboy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11315
  • If the bar ain't bending, you're just pretending
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #85 on: September 02, 2009, 05:03:53 AM »
and what about lou's enhanced calves?.. at least both nasser and dillett had great quads and calves while lou's whole lower body was relatively weak..
But they both had delts full of oil.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #86 on: September 02, 2009, 05:19:34 AM »
But they both had delts full of oil.

here is nasser of 95 and his delts were not filled with anything but pure muscles!

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #87 on: September 02, 2009, 10:47:06 AM »
here is nasser of 95 and his delts were not filled with anything but pure muscles!
Stop ruining good threads with Nasshole please.



challenge

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 383
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #88 on: September 02, 2009, 10:55:14 AM »
Damn great bodybuilder!

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #89 on: September 02, 2009, 10:55:59 AM »
Damn great bodybuilder!
Lou was a great bb.

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #90 on: September 02, 2009, 11:29:18 AM »
He stated in People magazine that he was paid $1,500.00 per week for the hulk.

of course, to many of you here, that is likely life-changing $.
GOOD PAY FOR THE 70'S.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79323
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #91 on: September 02, 2009, 12:23:13 PM »
ND, this pic. of nasser and kevin had been scanned by you and was posted here few months ago.. could you plz tell me from which contest it's??.. it seems to be mr. o. 96 but i am not sure.. thx..

Not the Olympia Grand Prix Czech Republic 1996 a contest Nasser won

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #92 on: September 02, 2009, 12:38:51 PM »
One of the best upper bodies

  Awesome pecs. Arguably the best ever. Besides that, massively overrated in every way.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #93 on: September 02, 2009, 12:41:15 PM »
he could hae won 3 or 5 olympias when arnold left.

  No.

Quote
he would have destroyed zane, franco, and


  No.

Quote
the 1980 arnold could have been 6-time winner arnold against 4 time winner ferrigno.

  Nope.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #94 on: September 02, 2009, 01:25:46 PM »
  No.
 

  No.

  Nope.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Have to disagree. Lou would have wiped the floor with zane, franco etc

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #95 on: September 02, 2009, 02:33:42 PM »
Have to disagree. Lou would have wiped the floor with zane, franco etc

  Hm...let me think...no.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Stark

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22988
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #96 on: September 02, 2009, 02:34:23 PM »
He was back then and always will be a momo greaseball pile of shit tard!




 - Block!

lol you still makle me fuckin laugh :D

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #97 on: September 02, 2009, 02:39:24 PM »
  Hm...let me think...no.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Good argument

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #98 on: September 02, 2009, 02:41:40 PM »
Good argument

  The thing is that when I write paragraphs explaining why I believe something no one reads them, so I recently decided to be more succint in my replies.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #99 on: September 02, 2009, 02:47:34 PM »
  The thing is that when I write paragraphs explaining why I believe something no one reads them, so I recently decided to be more succint in my replies.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Haha. I would have read it.  ;D

I believe Franco and co would have looked like kids next to Lou if he had continued training hard and dieted correctly. Lou was massive and had no real weak points(by 70's standards)