Dillet and Nasser are piles of shitty oil... Do not compare their physiques with Lou's...
Awesome Lou was shot? WTF? Who shot him? Was it someone bitching over autograph prices? What is vintage bodybuilding turning into?PPIP* Lou.* Penny-pinch in purgatory.
Exactly.
and what about lou's enhanced calves?.. at least both nasser and dillett had great quads and calves while lou's whole lower body was relatively weak..
He stated in People magazine that he was paid $1,500.00 per week for the hulk.of course, to many of you here, that is likely life-changing $.
In that regard, I have no idea what Lou was thinking. Why did he feel the need to resort to implants? Calves don't matter, look at Ronnie.
no not better than nasser of 1994.. post nasser's back from the NOC 94 and you will see.. also nasser's lats were wider.. i still see lou's back was small for the rest of his upper body.. his relatively narrow lats was taking a lot from his FLS pose..
But they both had delts full of oil.
here is nasser of 95 and his delts were not filled with anything but pure muscles!
Damn great bodybuilder!
ND, this pic. of nasser and kevin had been scanned by you and was posted here few months ago.. could you plz tell me from which contest it's??.. it seems to be mr. o. 96 but i am not sure.. thx..
One of the best upper bodies
he could hae won 3 or 5 olympias when arnold left.
he would have destroyed zane, franco, and
the 1980 arnold could have been 6-time winner arnold against 4 time winner ferrigno.
No. No. Nope.SUCKMYMUSCLE
Have to disagree. Lou would have wiped the floor with zane, franco etc
He was back then and always will be a momo greaseball pile of shit tard! - Block!
Hm...let me think...no.SUCKMYMUSCLE
Good argument
The thing is that when I write paragraphs explaining why I believe something no one reads them, so I recently decided to be more succint in my replies.SUCKMYMUSCLE