Author Topic: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot  (Read 26780 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79719
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« on: August 30, 2009, 03:40:15 PM »
One of the best upper bodies

Blockhead

  • Toms
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 7793
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2009, 03:43:04 PM »

 He was back then and always will be a momo greaseball pile of shit tard!




 - Block!
?

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2009, 03:43:13 PM »
One of the best upper bodies



very nice shot....but everytime I look a t a nice shot of Lou I can't help but think about the lost potential....he could have been one of the all time greats

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79719
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2009, 03:53:56 PM »
He was back then and always will be a momo greaseball pile of shit tard!




 - Block!

Nobody wanted his autograph back then lol

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79719
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2009, 03:56:24 PM »


very nice shot....but everytime I look a t a nice shot of Lou I can't help but think about the lost potential....he could have been one of the all time greats

He could have but he took the money and ran with The Hulk , I think I would have too

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2009, 04:01:16 PM »
Maybe he was...eh...errrmm....... wise...after all.  ???

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2009, 04:27:04 PM »
He could have but he took the money and ran with The Hulk , I think I would have too

He stated in People magazine that he was paid $1,500.00 per week for the hulk.

of course, to many of you here, that is likely life-changing $.

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2009, 04:33:33 PM »
.

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2009, 04:41:18 PM »
Wasn't he like just 23 years old or something in those pics? After Arnold retired I don't think anyone would have touched big Louie. Franco and Zane wouldn't have stood a chance.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2009, 05:04:08 PM »
One of the best upper bodies

yes if you excluded his back..

KevinP85

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2262
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #10 on: August 30, 2009, 05:09:21 PM »
Wasn't he like just 23 years old or something in those pics? After Arnold retired I don't think anyone would have touched big Louie. Franco and Zane wouldn't have stood a chance.


True, didn't he stop competing and started back in the 90's again. He could have done both, the so called "acting," and been Mr Olympia for god knows how many times after Arnold.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79719
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #11 on: August 30, 2009, 05:22:40 PM »
yes if you excluded his back..

You think his back sucked?  ???

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #12 on: August 30, 2009, 05:22:51 PM »
yes if you excluded his back..

Are you implying that Lou was the Nasser of his day?  ;)

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #13 on: August 30, 2009, 05:27:17 PM »
Are you implying that Lou was the Nasser of his day?  ;)

to some extent yes.. both had similar type of arms/shoulders combo too..

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #14 on: August 30, 2009, 05:32:06 PM »
.
Damn good pic there wonder how how much he would charge to autograph that?

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #15 on: August 30, 2009, 05:33:58 PM »
to some extent yes.. both had similar type of arms/shoulders combo too..

You know by agreeing, you sort of took the fun out of my little shot there.  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79719
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #16 on: August 30, 2009, 06:02:51 PM »
yes if you excluded his back..

Better get your eyes checked sport this back is better than Nasser


Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #17 on: August 30, 2009, 06:06:52 PM »
Better get your eyes checked sport this back is better than Nasser



Back detail looks pretty good, actually.  Something seems off about the shot to me though, and I'm not taking about the calves.  Something just seems funky about his balance there.   

mass 04

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #18 on: August 30, 2009, 06:09:22 PM »
Back detail looks pretty good, actually.  Something seems off about the shot to me though, and I'm not taking about the calves.  Something just seems funky about his structure there.   
epic editing your post about Lou's junk in the trunk.

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #19 on: August 30, 2009, 06:10:06 PM »
epic editing your post about Lou's junk in the trunk.
Am I crazy, or is his posterior enormous there?  Ok, I said it.  Unless it's his lower body, I don't know.  Something just doesn't seem to flow.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #20 on: August 30, 2009, 06:13:22 PM »
he could hae won 3 or 5 olympias when arnold left.  he would have destroyed zane, franco, and

the 1980 arnold could have been 6-time winner arnold against 4 time winner ferrigno.

he left to make $ in acting.  Can't blame him, but you also don't buy into that mid-90s pity party of 'i never won the big one' or crying after losing the masters O.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #21 on: August 30, 2009, 06:31:08 PM »
Better get your eyes checked sport this back is better than Nasser



no not better than nasser of 1994.. post nasser's back from the NOC 94 and you will see.. also nasser's lats were wider..

i still see lou's back was small for the rest of his upper body.. his relatively narrow lats was taking a lot from his FLS pose..

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #22 on: August 30, 2009, 06:32:37 PM »
he could hae won 3 or 5 olympias when arnold left.  he would have destroyed zane, franco, and

the 1980 arnold could have been 6-time winner arnold against 4 time winner ferrigno.

he left to make $ in acting.  Can't blame him, but you also don't buy into that mid-90s pity party of 'i never won the big one' or crying after losing the masters O.

Agreed, he was poised to take over after Arnold.  He would have destroyed little Franco in 1976.  Lou could have had long run on top.  Seeing shots of his conditioning around the time of making his Hercules movie gave a hint of what he could have brought to the table.

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #23 on: August 30, 2009, 06:34:28 PM »
no not better than nasser of 1994.. post nasser's back from the NOC 94 and you will see.. also nasser's lats were wider..

i still see lou's back was small for the rest of his upper body.. his relatively narrow lats was taking a lot from his FLS pose..


It's a bit hard to gauge how truly large Lou is there, being no one else is in the shot.  Would be interesting to see others side by side to compare. 

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79719
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
« Reply #24 on: August 30, 2009, 06:36:11 PM »
no not better than nasser of 1994.. post nasser's back from the NOC 94 and you will see.. also nasser's lats were wider..

i still see lou's back was small for the rest of his upper body.. his relatively narrow lats was taking a lot from his FLS pose..


Ahahahahah Nasser's back in 94 was wider than Lou's at 320 pounds ?? and you came to this conclusion how? your delusion knows no bounds