fucking homos...
got size and cuts?comparing Ronnie 97 to Ronnie 99 is like comparing Arnold 68 to Arnold 75.and yet the idiot nuthuggers are delusional enough to do it anyway.. all in a futile effort to make their hero seem better..
hahahahahah 97 9th place
1999 1997Ronnie looked better in 1997 than in 1999. Only his gut grew much bigger
His back grew too, exponentially.
lolthe nuthuggers are claiming that even dorian 97 would have beaten Ronnie, when in reality (something they run from all the time) dorian 93 or 94 (ie any year dorian) gets crushed:
got to agree with Hullster here1999 Ronnie crushes 97 without ronnie without a doubt
No there isn't that much of a staggering difference the only real difference is his conditioning improved . he was already competing at 255 pounds in 1997 in 1998 Chad completely dried him out he dropped down to 249 pounds and won
Epic faith and dogma attached to IFBB rankings lolSince you're a data-nerd..Coleman 8 Yates 6
Dorian 8 wins over Ronnie. Ronnie 0 wins over Dorian. The end. SUCKMYMUSCLE
by 99 Ronnie's back was so much bigger and thicker than it was in 97 it was hanging off him by his 99 win:but the nuthuggers claim there is no difference LOL
same taper , same quads , same arms , same back