That picture shows back detail, but you need a side shot if you're trying to show thickness. Thickness is the third dimension that's not shown in pictures that are taken directly behind or in front of a person.
See this is exactly your problem and I now know why you think he's much better than he really was , you're ignorant and it's not a dig on you or your intelligence , we all don't know until we learn
He has NO detail in that pic he has pretty good separation of the traps and every other muscle he is severely lacking in DEPTH which you can gauge via pics , his middle & lower back are soft as hell and he's hold water ( nothing new from the back ) compared to him to Flex & Ronnie and please learn what detail , depth and thickness are it's staggering the difference
and you're right . we really can't gauge thickness via two dimensional pictures this is where eyewitness accounts come into play in which numerous experts have said Nasser was not the same imposing force from the sides as he was from the front , and Dorian touched on this very topic when asked if he should have won against Nasser , he said ( paraphrasing ) yes because pictures don't tell the whole story , when you turn to the side and you're twice as thick as the other guys two dimensional photos don't show this
and you just claimed thickness can't be seen in pics yet posted a pic to counter my point his back wasn't thick LMAO which is it?