Author Topic: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side  (Read 11196 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #25 on: September 24, 2009, 01:46:27 PM »
Dorian's sheer back thickness is evident in the side shots, where as with Nasser you cant see his lats at all

Thank you ! someone who gets it .

Dorian on Nasser in 97

Q ] And likewise in 1997, when Nasser El Sonbaty came second?
dots

      Nasser from the front was phenomenal and in some poses from the front there is no doubt he beat me. But from the side he is very narrow and from the back there is no comparison really. You have to look at it logically. Let's say he beat me in the front relaxed pose and the front double bicep.

      I will give him this. Did he beat me in the side triceps? No. In either of the back poses? No. Abs and thighs was close. So no, I don't think he deserved to win although he did look very good that year. But he looked good from certain angles. Some physiques you can't judge from a photograph; you have to be there.

      Everyone who sees my physique in person always comments on how much better I look in person than in pictures. That's because my physique is thick and developed from all angles. From the front, from the back, from the side, standing on my head: it doesn't matter. Everywhere is fully developed from every angle. And this might not show in one-dimensional photos. When you turn somebody to the side and they are twice as thick as everyone else, then that shows up.

ManBearPig...

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12280
  • Professional Fighter
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #26 on: September 24, 2009, 01:47:39 PM »
nasser is a gypsy.
Deep Tissue Massage

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #27 on: September 24, 2009, 01:48:00 PM »
Dorian's sheer back thickness is evident in the side shots, where as with Nasser you cant see his lats at all

He's holding his left arm further back, that's why you can see his lat.  In the first picture in this thread Nasser is holding his arm further back too, and hence you can see his lat.  

lmfao sure it does  ::)

twice is thick , this is twice as thick for future reference  ;)



Compare both pecs and you'll see Nasser's are much thicker - thinking anything to the contrary is just blindness.


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #28 on: September 24, 2009, 01:48:42 PM »


fuck... ::) ... look at how each man is standing... nasser isn't opened up like dorian

doesn't matter his back thickness doesn't compare to Dorian anyway

Rinc

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 485
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #29 on: September 24, 2009, 01:48:51 PM »
This guy is insignificant in BB today.
Mr. O 09' Jay Cutler

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #30 on: September 24, 2009, 01:49:38 PM »
Thank you ! someone who gets it .

Dorian on Nasser in 97

Q ] And likewise in 1997, when Nasser El Sonbaty came second?
dots

      Nasser from the front was phenomenal and in some poses from the front there is no doubt he beat me. But from the side he is very narrow and from the back there is no comparison really. You have to look at it logically. Let's say he beat me in the front relaxed pose and the front double bicep.

      I will give him this. Did he beat me in the side triceps? No. In either of the back poses? No. Abs and thighs was close. So no, I don't think he deserved to win although he did look very good that year. But he looked good from certain angles. Some physiques you can't judge from a photograph; you have to be there.

      Everyone who sees my physique in person always comments on how much better I look in person than in pictures. That's because my physique is thick and developed from all angles. From the front, from the back, from the side, standing on my head: it doesn't matter. Everywhere is fully developed from every angle. And this might not show in one-dimensional photos. When you turn somebody to the side and they are twice as thick as everyone else, then that shows up.


LMFAO he's basically saying, "Pictures put me at a disadvantage yet not my competitors?"   ::)

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #31 on: September 24, 2009, 01:50:33 PM »
Nasser's chest looks at least twice as thick as Dorian's here  :o


Who won?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #32 on: September 24, 2009, 01:51:41 PM »
He's holding his left arm further back, that's why you can see his lat.  In the first picture in this thread Nasser is holding his arm further back too, and hence you can see his lat.  

Compare both pecs and you'll see Nasser's are much thicker - thinking anything to the contrary is just blindness.



No , no according to you he's twice as thick  ::) bullshit plain & simple look at the pic of Yates V Haney and see what twice as thick looks like and typical bob even entertaining it was true all you just did is post areas where you think he has an advantage , and ignore the rest and claim a hallow victory  ::) NOT how it works sport no place for cherry picking

and I'm glad you even admit he can't pose  ;D and see what Yates has to say  ;)

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #33 on: September 24, 2009, 01:52:32 PM »


fuck... ::) ... look at how each man is standing... nasser isn't opened up like dorian

QFT - the simplicity with which these guys think is mind-boggling at times!

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #34 on: September 24, 2009, 01:53:44 PM »
No , no according to you he's twice as thick  ::) bullshit plain & simple look at the pic of Yates V Haney and see what twice as thick looks like and typical bob even entertaining it was true all you just did is post areas where you think he has an advantage , and ignore the rest and claim a hallow victory  ::) NOT how it works sport no place for cherry picking

and I'm glad you even admit he can't pose  ;D and see what Yates has to say  ;)

Honest question, whose chest is thicker in that picture?  Let's see if you can swallow your pride and answer a question honestly without dodging.

Nasty Nate

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #35 on: September 24, 2009, 01:55:25 PM »
All i'm gonna say is that if I had to pick a physique to have between these two i'd go with Nasser 1997. Sure Dorian might've had a bit better back, but Nasser had better everything else... including midsection.

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #36 on: September 24, 2009, 01:56:10 PM »
All i'm gonna say is that if I had to pick a physique to have between these two i'd go with Nasser 1997. Sure Dorian might've had a bit better back, but Nasser had better everything else... including midsection.
Who won that year?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #37 on: September 24, 2009, 01:56:18 PM »
LMFAO he's basically saying, "Pictures put me at a disadvantage yet not my competitors?"   ::)

He's saying the truth something you can't seem to grasp , Nasser was better than him that year in the standing relaxed and front double biceps and came close on the ab-thigh and left for dead everywhere else , verified by the judges and reality

and yeah it's really easy to ascertain three dimensional thickness from two dimensional photos  ::) good thing contests were judged live & in person and not via the internet

reality puts Dorian at an clear advantage vs his competitors  ;)

JohnnyTosh GetBig 12-20-07

Hulkster, I have one question for you? .... Were you there in Long Beach in 97?  Because I was.  AND I was there in 93 & 95 in Atlanta & 96 in Chicago.  It's been said a million times. Yates has a Thickness & density from every angle that had to be seen in person, and that NOBODY else had.

I think Milos is awesome. I would LOVE to have his body, but Yates smoked everybody in the totality of ALL poses.  From the side & from the back, yates crushed everybody.

Unless you were there, you cannot really say accurately.  BTW, Demilia gave me tickets right behind the judges every year.

Not flaming, but Yates reigned supreme.. YES. HIS GUT was sticking out in 97 & Nasser looked as good, or maybe a hair better from the front in 97, but when they turned to the side & rear, DORIAN ruled again.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #38 on: September 24, 2009, 01:56:45 PM »
Thank you ! someone who gets it .

Dorian on Nasser in 97

Q ] And likewise in 1997, when Nasser El Sonbaty came second?
dots

      Nasser from the front was phenomenal and in some poses from the front there is no doubt he beat me. But from the side he is very narrow and from the back there is no comparison really. You have to look at it logically. Let's say he beat me in the front relaxed pose and the front double bicep.

      I will give him this. Did he beat me in the side triceps? No. In either of the back poses? No. Abs and thighs was close. So no, I don't think he deserved to win although he did look very good that year. But he looked good from certain angles. Some physiques you can't judge from a photograph; you have to be there.

      Everyone who sees my physique in person always comments on how much better I look in person than in pictures. That's because my physique is thick and developed from all angles. From the front, from the back, from the side, standing on my head: it doesn't matter. Everywhere is fully developed from every angle. And this might not show in one-dimensional photos. When you turn somebody to the side and they are twice as thick as everyone else, then that shows up.


Nasser on Dorian in 97:

 Q ] Having controversially lost the 1997 Mr. Olympia title, when many people thought you should have won, how did you take this result and why do you think the judges placed you second?
 
Yes definitely. That is a fact (I should have won the 1997 Mr. Olympia). When I did not receive the Sandow in 1997 I realized that there is no fair competition (in pro bodybuilding). I realized it earlier but, again, in 1997 it was more obvious than ever before.

In 1994 I came in second at the Night of Champions in New York City. I think that I should have won that specific show, but they let Mike Francois, as the reigning USA champion, take the title.

I was just the unknown, or better, the "unimportant" guy from Europe. The title stayed in the U.S. and Nasser went back to Europe. Besides, another European called Dorian Yates was already holding the Mr. Olympia title.

And to come back to 1997 (Mr. Olympia), Flex Wheeler came to me after the prejudging (which was on a Friday, so that they had the finals on Saturday - in order for them to generate more entrance ticket money in Long Beach, California) and told me backstage if I knew that they would not give me my very deserved title. I did not say too much because I hoped that he was wrong. But as we all know, Dorian Yates won the Olympia again, the very next day.

He won despite a huge belly (looking like he was pregnant in the sixth month), a waist like a drum, a torn up left biceps, a freshly torn left triceps, a quad tear left, a quad tear right, a torn right hip.

He won it with a perfect score, which was just unbelievable. This was a completely staged outcome and the biggest bodybuilding robbery of the 20th century by the clique of judges who "judged".

I also have to say that some judges had Dorian Yates even in third and fourth place, because about 13 judges judged officially. I think you just use seven of the score sheets. But these judges' (who scored Dorian lower) score sheets had not been used and some of the judges' had then been removed from the judging panel because they did not produce what was expected of them to produce.

There are multiple reasons why I did not win. Some judges did not want to upset their friend Dorian and they did not want him to go out of bodybuilding with a defeat after all his injuries and tears. They did not want to give another non-U.S. guy the most prestigious title in bodybuilding because it would underline the U.S. inferiority in bodybuilding compared to non-U.S. athletes.

Then definitely another reason is that I am so outspoken and not just an order follower. That I say how it is, and do not brown nose and make phone calls in order to "secure" a placement like so may others who play the official tough guy.

I have no problem calling people up, but not for the sole purpose of placing here and there in a certain spot. And I am, for too many people, far too educated and too intelligent. And they realized I could be a danger to them if I was the new titleholder.

And last but not least, when people saw my body they figured they couldn't achieve that. Before doing this they would rather be dead. So I was also physically too freaky and too big, even for pro bodybuilding. And I was also critical about judges and co-competitors and did not deny it when I was questioned about that.

[ Q ] You say your physique was too freaky and too massive; sounds like you were ahead of your time. How would you personally describe your physique and just what made you the best bodybuilder onstage at the 1997 Mr. Olympia?
 

The best proof of my superior physique over everyone else's physique can be seen on the 1997 Olympia tape. This says it all. But I would still like to make some statements.

I had, compared to 1997 Mr. Olympia title winner, Dorian Yates, the better built and the better, god given genetic structure with even nicer looking veins. I did not have one torn muscle like he had so many, many torn muscles. My body is more proportioned and more, way more symmetrical.

I had the better waist (also the best V-taper, shoulders/waistline), better and tighter abs, paper thin skin, better triceps, better biceps, better shoulders, better chest, better hams, and better quads. I was tighter, harder and fresher in appearance (because I did not have a couple of week-old triceps tears which had not even been attempted to have been fixed surgically, otherwise Yates wouldn't have been able to step on stage).

Then I heard the big BS - "... but Dorian had him (Nasser) from the back." The only body part I give Yates when he supposedly had me was his tremendous lower back development but not his thickness or back width.

The Olympia is not a lower back contest. An Olympia title is not to be given out to the best lower back - otherwise why do all of us still train all of the other body parts?

My general opinion of that show, the 1997 two-day Olympia, is that I got robbed live in front of thousands of people but with no consequences for anyone but me and a few judges who did not judge according to that which was expected of them, that what was suggested to them.


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #39 on: September 24, 2009, 01:57:55 PM »
Honest question, whose chest is thicker in that picture?  Let's see if you can swallow your pride and answer a question honestly without dodging.

Honest question whose chest is TWICE as thick in that picture? you know what about honesty? not much like your hero

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #40 on: September 24, 2009, 01:58:28 PM »
Nasser on Dorian in 97:

 Q ] Having controversially lost the 1997 Mr. Olympia title, when many people thought you should have won, how did you take this result and why do you think the judges placed you second?
 
Yes definitely. That is a fact (I should have won the 1997 Mr. Olympia). When I did not receive the Sandow in 1997 I realized that there is no fair competition (in pro bodybuilding). I realized it earlier but, again, in 1997 it was more obvious than ever before.

In 1994 I came in second at the Night of Champions in New York City. I think that I should have won that specific show, but they let Mike Francois, as the reigning USA champion, take the title.

I was just the unknown, or better, the "unimportant" guy from Europe. The title stayed in the U.S. and Nasser went back to Europe. Besides, another European called Dorian Yates was already holding the Mr. Olympia title.

And to come back to 1997 (Mr. Olympia), Flex Wheeler came to me after the prejudging (which was on a Friday, so that they had the finals on Saturday - in order for them to generate more entrance ticket money in Long Beach, California) and told me backstage if I knew that they would not give me my very deserved title. I did not say too much because I hoped that he was wrong. But as we all know, Dorian Yates won the Olympia again, the very next day.

He won despite a huge belly (looking like he was pregnant in the sixth month), a waist like a drum, a torn up left biceps, a freshly torn left triceps, a quad tear left, a quad tear right, a torn right hip.

He won it with a perfect score, which was just unbelievable. This was a completely staged outcome and the biggest bodybuilding robbery of the 20th century by the clique of judges who "judged".

I also have to say that some judges had Dorian Yates even in third and fourth place, because about 13 judges judged officially. I think you just use seven of the score sheets. But these judges' (who scored Dorian lower) score sheets had not been used and some of the judges' had then been removed from the judging panel because they did not produce what was expected of them to produce.

There are multiple reasons why I did not win. Some judges did not want to upset their friend Dorian and they did not want him to go out of bodybuilding with a defeat after all his injuries and tears. They did not want to give another non-U.S. guy the most prestigious title in bodybuilding because it would underline the U.S. inferiority in bodybuilding compared to non-U.S. athletes.

Then definitely another reason is that I am so outspoken and not just an order follower. That I say how it is, and do not brown nose and make phone calls in order to "secure" a placement like so may others who play the official tough guy.

I have no problem calling people up, but not for the sole purpose of placing here and there in a certain spot. And I am, for too many people, far too educated and too intelligent. And they realized I could be a danger to them if I was the new titleholder.

And last but not least, when people saw my body they figured they couldn't achieve that. Before doing this they would rather be dead. So I was also physically too freaky and too big, even for pro bodybuilding. And I was also critical about judges and co-competitors and did not deny it when I was questioned about that.

[ Q ] You say your physique was too freaky and too massive; sounds like you were ahead of your time. How would you personally describe your physique and just what made you the best bodybuilder onstage at the 1997 Mr. Olympia?
 

The best proof of my superior physique over everyone else's physique can be seen on the 1997 Olympia tape. This says it all. But I would still like to make some statements.

I had, compared to 1997 Mr. Olympia title winner, Dorian Yates, the better built and the better, god given genetic structure with even nicer looking veins. I did not have one torn muscle like he had so many, many torn muscles. My body is more proportioned and more, way more symmetrical.

I had the better waist (also the best V-taper, shoulders/waistline), better and tighter abs, paper thin skin, better triceps, better biceps, better shoulders, better chest, better hams, and better quads. I was tighter, harder and fresher in appearance (because I did not have a couple of week-old triceps tears which had not even been attempted to have been fixed surgically, otherwise Yates wouldn't have been able to step on stage).

Then I heard the big BS - "... but Dorian had him (Nasser) from the back." The only body part I give Yates when he supposedly had me was his tremendous lower back development but not his thickness or back width.

The Olympia is not a lower back contest. An Olympia title is not to be given out to the best lower back - otherwise why do all of us still train all of the other body parts?

My general opinion of that show, the 1997 two-day Olympia, is that I got robbed live in front of thousands of people but with no consequences for anyone but me and a few judges who did not judge according to that which was expected of them, that what was suggested to them.


The Wizard of rambling bitterness.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #41 on: September 24, 2009, 01:59:24 PM »
YES. HIS GUT was sticking out in 97 & Nasser looked as good, or maybe a hair better from the front in 97

ahahahahahaha!!!  Only a "hair" better from the front  ::) ::)

Nasty Nate

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #42 on: September 24, 2009, 01:59:44 PM »
Who won that year?

You must be kidding... EVERYONE knows Nasser made Dorian look like SHIT that year... enough with that crap.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #43 on: September 24, 2009, 02:00:19 PM »
Honest question whose chest is TWICE as thick in that picture? you know what about honesty? not much like your hero

Dodged my question, just as I expected ;)

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #44 on: September 24, 2009, 02:01:36 PM »
Who won that year?

Dorian won.  That's an easy answer.  The question at hand is whether it was fair.

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #45 on: September 24, 2009, 02:09:00 PM »
Dorian won.  That's an easy answer.  The question at hand is whether it was fair.
Dorian - 6
Nasser - 0

End of debate. Put it to bed now.

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #46 on: September 24, 2009, 02:09:41 PM »
 Bigbobs yet again destroy the lies and propaganda spread by the anti-Nasser, alliance of failures and unemployed underclass. Look how quickly nastysissy diety reply to Bob's excellent thread - within a minute. This guy have nothing to do but do the bidding of the Yates creature/burglar/ defrauder of rightful Mr Olympias!!

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #47 on: September 24, 2009, 02:21:09 PM »
Dorian - 6
Nasser - 0

End of debate. Put it to bed now.

Typical pumpkinhead whose brain capacity is not beyond reading contest results decided on by others and can not think or assess for oneself as to whether the results are fair or justified.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #48 on: September 24, 2009, 02:23:02 PM »
Bigbobs yet again destroy the lies and propaganda spread by the anti-Nasser, alliance of failures and unemployed underclass. Look how quickly nastysissy diety reply to Bob's excellent thread - within a minute. This guy have nothing to do but do the bidding of the Yates creature/burglar/ defrauder of rightful Mr Olympias!!

Hahahaha, yes it is true that ND sits all day and clicks "refresh" on getbig in hopes that Hulkster or one of us creates a thread for him to reply to all day and night to help pass time from his boring day  ;D

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #49 on: September 24, 2009, 02:25:00 PM »
Typical pumpkinhead whose brain capacity is not beyond reading contest results decided on by others and can not think or assess for oneself as to whether the results are fair or justified.
Typical Nasshole supporter...blinded by the fact that their leader got his thong in a twist because he got his ass handed to him every year. How many Mr O's did Nasshole win? Soft watery back, oily arms, oily delts and bad posing. Sorry Bobs.