Author Topic: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side  (Read 11281 times)

tendonitis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4595
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #50 on: September 24, 2009, 02:29:08 PM »
Nasser is delusional.  His back wasn't just bad, it was terrible.  TERRIBLE.
You can't expect to win the biggest contest of the year when you're lacking such a major bodypart.
The wizard of synthol and soiled manties has no one to blame but himself.  He knew he needed to improve his back yet he didn't.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #51 on: September 24, 2009, 02:30:12 PM »
Nasser on Dorian in 97:

 Q ] Having controversially lost the 1997 Mr. Olympia title, when many people thought you should have won, how did you take this result and why do you think the judges placed you second?
 
Yes definitely. That is a fact (I should have won the 1997 Mr. Olympia). When I did not receive the Sandow in 1997 I realized that there is no fair competition (in pro bodybuilding). I realized it earlier but, again, in 1997 it was more obvious than ever before.

In 1994 I came in second at the Night of Champions in New York City. I think that I should have won that specific show, but they let Mike Francois, as the reigning USA champion, take the title.

I was just the unknown, or better, the "unimportant" guy from Europe. The title stayed in the U.S. and Nasser went back to Europe. Besides, another European called Dorian Yates was already holding the Mr. Olympia title.

And to come back to 1997 (Mr. Olympia), Flex Wheeler came to me after the prejudging (which was on a Friday, so that they had the finals on Saturday - in order for them to generate more entrance ticket money in Long Beach, California) and told me backstage if I knew that they would not give me my very deserved title. I did not say too much because I hoped that he was wrong. But as we all know, Dorian Yates won the Olympia again, the very next day.

He won despite a huge belly (looking like he was pregnant in the sixth month), a waist like a drum, a torn up left biceps, a freshly torn left triceps, a quad tear left, a quad tear right, a torn right hip.

He won it with a perfect score, which was just unbelievable. This was a completely staged outcome and the biggest bodybuilding robbery of the 20th century by the clique of judges who "judged".

I also have to say that some judges had Dorian Yates even in third and fourth place, because about 13 judges judged officially. I think you just use seven of the score sheets. But these judges' (who scored Dorian lower) score sheets had not been used and some of the judges' had then been removed from the judging panel because they did not produce what was expected of them to produce.

There are multiple reasons why I did not win. Some judges did not want to upset their friend Dorian and they did not want him to go out of bodybuilding with a defeat after all his injuries and tears. They did not want to give another non-U.S. guy the most prestigious title in bodybuilding because it would underline the U.S. inferiority in bodybuilding compared to non-U.S. athletes.

Then definitely another reason is that I am so outspoken and not just an order follower. That I say how it is, and do not brown nose and make phone calls in order to "secure" a placement like so may others who play the official tough guy.

I have no problem calling people up, but not for the sole purpose of placing here and there in a certain spot. And I am, for too many people, far too educated and too intelligent. And they realized I could be a danger to them if I was the new titleholder.

And last but not least, when people saw my body they figured they couldn't achieve that. Before doing this they would rather be dead. So I was also physically too freaky and too big, even for pro bodybuilding. And I was also critical about judges and co-competitors and did not deny it when I was questioned about that.

[ Q ] You say your physique was too freaky and too massive; sounds like you were ahead of your time. How would you personally describe your physique and just what made you the best bodybuilder onstage at the 1997 Mr. Olympia?
 

The best proof of my superior physique over everyone else's physique can be seen on the 1997 Olympia tape. This says it all. But I would still like to make some statements.

I had, compared to 1997 Mr. Olympia title winner, Dorian Yates, the better built and the better, god given genetic structure with even nicer looking veins. I did not have one torn muscle like he had so many, many torn muscles. My body is more proportioned and more, way more symmetrical.

I had the better waist (also the best V-taper, shoulders/waistline), better and tighter abs, paper thin skin, better triceps, better biceps, better shoulders, better chest, better hams, and better quads. I was tighter, harder and fresher in appearance (because I did not have a couple of week-old triceps tears which had not even been attempted to have been fixed surgically, otherwise Yates wouldn't have been able to step on stage).

Then I heard the big BS - "... but Dorian had him (Nasser) from the back." The only body part I give Yates when he supposedly had me was his tremendous lower back development but not his thickness or back width.

The Olympia is not a lower back contest. An Olympia title is not to be given out to the best lower back - otherwise why do all of us still train all of the other body parts?

My general opinion of that show, the 1997 two-day Olympia, is that I got robbed live in front of thousands of people but with no consequences for anyone but me and a few judges who did not judge according to that which was expected of them, that what was suggested to them.



what's he gonna say? the truth? hahahahahahahaha the judges spoke

Quote
Yes definitely. That is a fact (I should have won the 1997 Mr. Olympia). When I did not receive the Sandow in 1997 I realized that there is no fair competition (in pro bodybuilding). I realized it earlier but, again, in 1997 it was more obvious than ever before.

No fair competition ? all of his six wins were NOT fair then either he won using the same unfairness he's bitching about

Quote
In 1994 I came in second at the Night of Champions in New York City. I think that I should have won that specific show, but they let Mike Francois, as the reigning USA champion, take the title.

Well he doesn't judge shows of course he thinks he should have won and the old plea to letting a USA bodybuilder win , all the while the winner of the biggest competition in bodybuilding was from the UK , poor me I wasn't an American so I was robbed  ::)

Quote
I was just the unknown, or better, the "unimportant" guy from Europe. The title stayed in the U.S. and Nasser went back to Europe. Besides, another European called Dorian Yates was already holding the Mr. Olympia title.

Dorian was unknown when he entered the NOC and LOST to Momo another non-American BTW and so he figured out the plot . we can't have two European champions lol conspiracy anyone?

Quote
And to come back to 1997 (Mr. Olympia), Flex Wheeler came to me after the prejudging (which was on a Friday, so that they had the finals on Saturday - in order for them to generate more entrance ticket money in Long Beach, California) and told me backstage if I knew that they would not give me my very deserved title. I did not say too much because I hoped that he was wrong. But as we all know, Dorian Yates won the Olympia again, the very next day.

Wow validation from Flex Wheeler case closed  ::) the same guy who said he was attacked by Ninjas , not a source with much credibility and I always love how Nasser eludes that he was let in on the scam before the fact backstage , he's always playing the victim like Mike Mattarazzo and the diuretics test in 96

Quote
He won despite a huge belly (looking like he was pregnant in the sixth month), a waist like a drum, a torn up left biceps, a freshly torn left triceps, a quad tear left, a quad tear right, a torn right hip.

he did have a huge belly when fully relaxed a thing he did a lot at this show not whilst he was flexing , the only tear was the triceps all other tears were old which he has NO problem with in 1995 when he admitted he was trounced

Quote
He won it with a perfect score, which was just unbelievable. This was a completely staged outcome and the biggest bodybuilding robbery of the 20th century by the clique of judges who "judged".

no unbelievable when you know how contests are judged , he could lose poses and seeing the high & low scores are tossed can still with with a perfect score , I was robbed , I'm a victim , blah , blah , blah , ALL of his wins the judging was fair  ::)

Quote
I also have to say that some judges had Dorian Yates even in third and fourth place, because about 13 judges judged officially. I think you just use seven of the score sheets. But these judges' (who scored Dorian lower) score sheets had not been used and some of the judges' had then been removed from the judging panel because they did not produce what was expected of them to produce.

stupid hello? highs & low scores are tossed out , and more hearsay by Nasser not producing one shred of evidence as usual

Quote
There are multiple reasons why I did not win. Some judges did not want to upset their friend Dorian and they did not want him to go out of bodybuilding with a defeat after all his injuries and tears. They did not want to give another non-U.S. guy the most prestigious title in bodybuilding because it would underline the U.S. inferiority in bodybuilding compared to non-U.S. athletes.

The judges didn't know Dorian was retiring NO ONE knew until 1998 so much for that theory . the are multiple reasons you didn't win yeah because you weren't good enough but have to pushing the issue of latent racism and xenophobia which is again a trend with him , it can't be him it has to be everyone else , the system is against him

Quote
Then definitely another reason is that I am so outspoken and not just an order follower. That I say how it is, and do not brown nose and make phone calls in order to "secure" a placement like so may others who play the official tough guy.

And if you were you would win some how? the old outside man more of his victimization plea

Quote
I have no problem calling people up, but not for the sole purpose of placing here and there in a certain spot. And I am, for too many people, far too educated and too intelligent. And they realized I could be a danger to them if I was the new titleholder.

yes the threat known as Nasser El Sonbaty , the outsider who was going to stir up the whole machine lol it's funny how he creates this whole persona instead of just admitting he simply wasn't good enough

Quote
And last but not least, when people saw my body they figured they couldn't achieve that. Before doing this they would rather be dead. So I was also physically too freaky and too big, even for pro bodybuilding. And I was also critical about judges and co-competitors and did not deny it when I was questioned about that.

Yes you were just to much for the establishment to handle , they couldn't market you to anyone because you were 270 pounds in 1997 and yet the winner was the same weight lmfao Nasser was bigger than the sport

Quote
[ Q ] You say your physique was too freaky and too massive; sounds like you were ahead of your time. How would you personally describe your physique and just what made you the best bodybuilder onstage at the 1997 Mr. Olympia?
 

The best proof of my superior physique over everyone else's physique can be seen on the 1997 Olympia tape. This says it all. But I would still like to make some statements.

yeah he was really ahead of his time  ::) Dorian was 300 pounds in 1993 offseason , 269 pounds in near contest shape in 1993 , 282 pounds in 1995 in near contest shape , while Nasser was placing 15th  ::) yeah really ahead of the curve

Quote
I had, compared to 1997 Mr. Olympia title winner, Dorian Yates, the better built and the better, god given genetic structure with even nicer looking veins. I did not have one torn muscle like he had so many, many torn muscles. My body is more proportioned and more, way more symmetrical.

lmfao nicer looking veins ? knitpicking ? he didn't have any torn muscles true he also had NO back either he may have been more proportional and ' symmetrical ' he was also softer & not as dry but typical Nasser picks his strengths ignores his weaknesses and states his case NOT how it works which he found out but never learned

Quote
I had the better waist (also the best V-taper, shoulders/waistline), better and tighter abs, paper thin skin, better triceps, better biceps, better shoulders, better chest, better hams, and better quads. I was tighter, harder and fresher in appearance (because I did not have a couple of week-old triceps tears which had not even been attempted to have been fixed surgically, otherwise Yates wouldn't have been able to step on stage).

And contests are judges on who has better parts it's who has better poses based on ALL of the criteria not some of it

Quote
Then I heard the big BS - "... but Dorian had him (Nasser) from the back." The only body part I give Yates when he supposedly had me was his tremendous lower back development but not his thickness or back width.

The Olympia is not a lower back contest. An Olympia title is not to be given out to the best lower back - otherwise why do all of us still train all of the other body parts?

My general opinion of that show, the 1997 two-day Olympia, is that I got robbed live in front of thousands of people but with no consequences for anyone but me and a few judges who did not judge according to that which was expected of them, that what was suggested to them.

Dorian beats him in width AND thickness NO contest and lower back and every single part of the back , the Olympia isn't a lower back contest duh it's not a " I have better parts ' contest either , Dorian beat him in the back double biceps POSE the rear latspread POSE the standing relaxed from the back POSE he beat him in the side triceps & side chest POSE the front latspread POSE the 1/4 turn POSES which is why he won

12 years latter still crying , he's a bitter man who is lacking in his life , Lee Labrada was similar in he came close to winner the Olympia and didn't , you don't see him crying and bitching about how he was a victim , he's a real class act who has a life now and isn't crying about the glory days



NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #52 on: September 24, 2009, 02:31:19 PM »
Dodged my question, just as I expected ;)

I answered your question you didn't like the answer

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #53 on: September 24, 2009, 02:34:09 PM »
Hahahaha, yes it is true that ND sits all day and clicks "refresh" on getbig in hopes that Hulkster or one of us creates a thread for him to reply to all day and night to help pass time from his boring day  ;D

When you have nothing try the old personal attacks  ;) thanks for admitting you have nothing to offer and I don't have to worry about you or Hulkster trolling the boards that's a given
 ;)



bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #54 on: September 24, 2009, 02:35:56 PM »
When you have nothing try the old personal attacks  ;) thanks for admitting you have nothing to offer and I don't have to worry about you or Hulkster trolling the boards that's a given
 ;)




Sorry if I hurt your feelings, I didn't mean that as a "personal attack,"  just throwing some humour in the mix :)  After all, it is true that you were the first to reply and within a minute, and you always give Hulkster a hard time for doing that to your posts  :D

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #55 on: September 24, 2009, 02:37:47 PM »
I answered your question you didn't like the answer

Nope, the question was simple - "whose chest is thicker in that comparison?" - and has two simple options to chose from - a) Nasser or b) Dorian.  You chose neither hence you dodged the question.

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #56 on: September 24, 2009, 02:41:05 PM »
nasser looks small

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #57 on: September 24, 2009, 02:41:47 PM »
Sorry if I hurt your feelings, I didn't mean that as a "personal attack,"  just throwing some humour in the mix :)  After all, it is true that you were the first to reply and within a minute, and you always give Hulkster a hard time for doing that to your posts  :D

Wow you internet-hurt my feelings , that's you making assumptions again Bobs , I said when you can't counter the argument you look to attack the messenger it's a sign of frustration has nothing to do with hurt feelings , you want my feelings to be hurt hence why you typed it

and I'm online I average 13 posts a day if you think that's living on here so be it , when I get to your comrades posting average like Dave 33 a day then you can comment and once again Bigbobs get it's wrong again , I don't give Hulkster a hard time for that just for following me into every single thread big difference

You and the gimmick known as sharma just troll the same spam about Nasser as usual and when anyone proves your nonsense to be dribble you attack the person typing , typical of those who don't have much to offer


Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #58 on: September 24, 2009, 02:43:44 PM »
Sorry if I hurt your feelings, I didn't mean that as a "personal attack,"  just throwing some humour in the mix :)  After all, it is true that you were the first to reply and within a minute, and you always give Hulkster a hard time for doing that to your posts  :D

LOL. Excellent post. Nastydiet do take this a little bit personal but then again, they call the TEAM obsessed but he spend all his life here arguing for the gut of Dorian. Maybe when he see those torn up arms and bloated, drowned cadaver belly he feel defensive?

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #59 on: September 24, 2009, 02:46:11 PM »
Wow you internet-hurt my feelings , that's you making assumptions again Bobs , I said when you can't counter the argument you look to attack the messenger it's a sign of frustration has nothing to do with hurt feelings , you want my feelings to be hurt hence why you typed it

and I'm online I average 13 posts a day if you think that's living on here so be it , when I get to your comrades posting average like Dave 33 a day then you can comment and once again Bigbobs get it's wrong again , I don't give Hulkster a hard time for that just for following me into every single thread big difference

You and the gimmick known as sharma just troll the same spam about Nasser as usual and when anyone proves your nonsense to be dribble you attack the person typing , typical of those who don't have much to offer


Whoa, never knew you had such conspiracy theories.  Whose "gimmick" do you think Sharma is?  Remember your other conspiracy theory that Sherief Shalaby was a "gimmick" and not even in Egypt LOL.  

As for the "personal attack" - Sharma noted (and correctly) that you followed me into this thread by replying within a minute, and I laughed and agreed with him in my reply.  You would like to think that had something to do with us having "nothing left to offer" or as being a sign of frustration, when in fact I have offered picture evidence and reasoned along with them, and in response you can not even answer a simple question I posed to you.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #60 on: September 24, 2009, 02:47:08 PM »
Nope, the question was simple - "whose chest is thicker in that comparison?" - and has two simple options to chose from - a) Nasser or b) Dorian.  You chose neither hence you dodged the question.

Nasser's chest is NOT thicker than Dorian's in that pose and sure as fuck not ' twice as thick ' as you claimed . Dorian's left arm if extended so his pec looks less full because it's not contracted his right pec looks at the least equally thick as Nassers and you're just flat out delusional to claim it's twice as thick and even entertaining it was slightly thicker means what? he's much heavier it should be so either way you're not working with much considering it's once again NOT a part contest

who is doing the pose correctly? who has better balance between his upper & lower body? who has short legs and a long torso? who is harder & drier? who looks at least as big if not bigger despite being lighter?  I mean stop cherry picking


bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #61 on: September 24, 2009, 02:47:18 PM »
LOL. Excellent post. Nastydiet do take this a little bit personal but then again, they call the TEAM obsessed but he spend all his life here arguing for the gut of Dorian. Maybe when he see those torn up arms and bloated, drowned cadaver belly he feel defensive?

Funny how he always accuses Hulkster of "trolling" and "following him" yet he does the same and when called on it (like you did today) he cries that we're "personally attacking" him because we have nothing to offer lol.

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #62 on: September 24, 2009, 02:48:49 PM »


You and the gimmick known as sharma just troll the same spam about Nasser as usual and when anyone proves your nonsense to be dribble you attack the person typing , typical of those who don't have much to offer



Epic and most brutal off all hypocrisy ever seen!!

Bobs is respectful, humorous and intelligent. He also give others their due. You, on the other hand, sabotage virtually EVERY single thread about bodybuilding by having the same spam and troll argument with the same guys.

You actually do more harm than anyone do as you try to ignite everything into the Yates monstrosity VS Coleman . You post more spam and same shit over and over than TEAM ever do.

HAHAH Unbelievable

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #63 on: September 24, 2009, 02:51:13 PM »
Funny how he always accuses Hulkster of "trolling" and "following him" yet he does the same and when called on it (like you did today) he cries that we're "personally attacking" him because we have nothing to offer lol.

 Bobs, his hypocrisy is so staggering I wonder if he is just simply trolling us. Surely he cannot be so addicted to Ron's paradise and bereft of even a meagre social life that he cannot see it?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #64 on: September 24, 2009, 02:54:09 PM »
Whoa, never knew you had such conspiracy theories.  Whose "gimmick" do you think Sharma is?  Remember your other conspiracy theory that Sherief Shalaby was a "gimmick" and not even in Egypt LOL.  

As for the "personal attack" - Sharma noted (and correctly) that you followed me into this thread by replying within a minute, and I laughed and agreed with him in my reply.  You would like to think that had something to do with us having "nothing left to offer" or as being a sign of frustration, when in fact I have offered picture evidence and reasoned along with them, and in response you can not even answer a simple question I posed to you.

Quote
Whoa, never knew you had such conspiracy theories.  Whose "gimmick" do you think Sharma is?  Remember your other conspiracy theory that Sherief Shalaby was a "gimmick" and not even in Egypt LOL. 

please spare us the nonsense sharma is a gimmick ( duh ) whose? I could care less

Quote
As for the "personal attack" - Sharma noted (and correctly) that you followed me into this thread by replying within a minute, and I laughed and agreed with him in my reply.  You would like to think that had something to do with us having "nothing left to offer" or as being a sign of frustration, when in fact I have offered picture evidence and reasoned along with them, and in response you can not even answer a simple question I posed to you.

I did follow you into this thread and decided to comment on it and to prove you wrong , something I enjoy doing ( Kevin Levrone ring a bell?  ;) ) and it was a personal attack you and him couldn't touch what I was saying so try and bad mouth the messenger , I could care less but it shows how desperate you guys can be

You posted a pic claimed we said Nasser was ' weak ' from the sides which I quickly corrected you on and proved he is narrow compared to Dorian who was lighter in the exact same pose and as far as answering your question see above , In fact I answered ALL of Nasser's statements , I don't need to run I never did it with Hulkster or anyone else why start now?


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #65 on: September 24, 2009, 02:58:20 PM »
Funny how he always accuses Hulkster of "trolling" and "following him" yet he does the same and when called on it (like you did today) he cries that we're "personally attacking" him because we have nothing to offer lol.

Wow as usual you don't know the difference , Hulkster trolls his same 99 Olympia pics in every thread , he constantly spams the board with Ronnie pics and personal attacks

and when I was sticking to the topic at hand in comes sharma to try and divert the topic from reality attack anyone who disagrees and spams the board with the same Nasser was robbed and the best ever spiel and Dorian Yates is a thief , which you including yourself gets involved in from time to time


Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #66 on: September 24, 2009, 03:00:34 PM »
please spare us the nonsense sharma is a gimmick ( duh ) whose? I could care less

I did follow you into this thread and decided to comment on it and to prove you wrong , something I enjoy doing ( Kevin Levrone ring a bell?  ;) ) and it was a personal attack you and him couldn't touch what I was saying so try and bad mouth the messenger , I could care less but it shows how desperate you guys can be

You posted a pic claimed we said Nasser was ' weak ' from the sides which I quickly corrected you on and proved he is narrow compared to Dorian who was lighter in the exact same pose and as far as answering your question see above , In fact I answered ALL of Nasser's statements , I don't need to run I never did it with Hulkster or anyone else why start now?


Where did sheriff go ?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #67 on: September 24, 2009, 03:01:26 PM »
Epic and most brutal off all hypocrisy ever seen!!

Bobs is respectful, humorous and intelligent. He also give others their due. You, on the other hand, sabotage virtually EVERY single thread about bodybuilding by having the same spam and troll argument with the same guys.

You actually do more harm than anyone do as you try to ignite everything into the Yates monstrosity VS Coleman . You post more spam and same shit over and over than TEAM ever do.

HAHAH Unbelievable

projection at it's finest ! everything you just typed you sir are guilty of  ;D thanks for proving my point.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #68 on: September 24, 2009, 03:01:48 PM »
Nasser's chest is NOT thicker than Dorian's in that pose and sure as fuck not ' twice as thick ' as you claimed . Dorian's left arm if extended so his pec looks less full because it's not contracted his right pec looks at the least equally thick as Nassers

Bolded text = bullshit and you know it :)

and even entertaining it was slightly thicker means what? he's much heavier it should be so either way you're not working with much considering it's once again NOT a part contest

Not just "slightly" but much thicker, and in 95 Nasser weighed about 10 lbs more only.  And competitors arent assessed as to how they look as a function of bodyweight, so it doesn't even matter who weighs more.  It's like saying, "Sure Dorian is bigger than Shawn Ray but that's just because he weighs more."  ::)

who is doing the pose correctly? who has better balance between his upper & lower body? who has short legs and a long torso? who is harder & drier? who looks at least as big if not bigger despite being lighter?  I mean stop cherry picking

Now you're cherry picking.

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #69 on: September 24, 2009, 03:04:08 PM »
Wow as usual you don't know the difference , Hulkster trolls his same 99 Olympia pics in every thread , he constantly spams the board with Ronnie pics and personal attacks


 Again, more blatant hypocrisy from hypocritic diety. You spam over and over the Kevin Horton shit, same pictures of the Yates gargoyle, bowflex pictures and pumpster quotes.

You sound like a little baby with your thirty thousand posts - many  whinging like some western homo "he started it".

You have no moral highground when it come to personal attacks or spamming.

Humorless shut-in.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #70 on: September 24, 2009, 03:05:45 PM »
please spare us the nonsense sharma is a gimmick ( duh ) whose? I could care less

What makes you think he's a gimmick?  Who shares similar style as him?  No one - as he is second to none with his way of words and wit. ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83981
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #71 on: September 24, 2009, 03:06:18 PM »
Bobs, his hypocrisy is so staggering I wonder if he is just simply trolling us. Surely he cannot be so addicted to Ron's paradise and bereft of even a meagre social life that he cannot see it?

Oh no I don't have a social life because I post on GetBig lmao hypocrisy is a common theme with Team Nasser when your comrade quakeroats posted in defense of Nasser he was revered yet you never commented on the fact he averaged 33 posts a day , yet no questions about his social life hahahahahahaha

again thanks for proving me right

Dorian makes Nasser look narrow in this pose , Yates is outclassing Nasser by a country mile , try sticking to the topic

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #72 on: September 24, 2009, 03:06:58 PM »
Again, more blatant hypocrisy from hypocritic diety. You spam over and over the Kevin Horton shit, same pictures of the Yates gargoyle, bowflex pictures and pumpster quotes.
You sound like a little baby with your thirty thousand posts - many  whinging like some western homo "he started it".

You have no moral highground when it come to personal attacks or spamming.

Humorless shut-in.

Great point - if you add up all of Team Nasser members' posts about Nasser it would still be less than the # of recycled posts by ND (almost 30,000!)

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #73 on: September 24, 2009, 03:07:49 PM »
nasser looks small

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The myth that Nasser was weak from the side
« Reply #74 on: September 24, 2009, 03:09:05 PM »
What makes you think he's a gimmick?  Who shares similar style as him?  No one - as he is second to none with his way of words and wit. ;)


 Bobs, you know that I am you, SS, TrueAdonis, block, the quakeroats legend !!!

Any more? I lose track of the weekly innuendo and allegations from the fevered rodent brains!!!