Author Topic: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09  (Read 38116 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #100 on: October 02, 2009, 11:39:16 AM »
yup.

saying that Jay 09 would push peak Ronnie is the same has trying to argue that Paul Dillett would have done the same thing.

after all, paul was bigger and wider...and thats about the only advantage he would have.

same with Jay.


its the same, from Jay's comparatively weak back and everything..

Hahahahahahahahaha pwned by your own fucking hero yet again  ;D

Flex June 2002

Paul Dillett  ;)

Do you still dream of winning the Mr. Olympia?

I spoke with Ronnie Coleman, the reigning Mr. Olympia, about six months ago, and he admitted that I was the one bodybuilder who he thought could beat him if I was at my best. So, yes, I still' believe in my heart that I can win the Sandow.

Ronnie Coleman won the '98 Night Of Champions and that got the buzz going that he could win the Mr. O. If everything goes according to plan, could you quickly reestablish your contender status with a decisive victory in New York?

Most of the people who have a clue about this sport know that I'm the guy who got the whole "freaky size" thing going in 1993. If I'm at my best, I can still beat any bodybuilder in the world.


Including Ronnie Coleman?

Anyone is beatable.


Jay would absolutely give Ronnie 1998/1999/2001 a run for his money but I don't think he would beat him 

How does it fell being constantly owned by your own hero? it's gotta suck and then add insult to injury I kick your ass yet again  ;D

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #101 on: October 02, 2009, 11:41:32 AM »
The irony.

LMMFAO Hulkster the complete retard once again proving me right lol what a dummy  ;D

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #102 on: October 02, 2009, 11:46:03 AM »
Dwarfed? No.  Getting owned? Fuck yes.

I never said he wasn't I said he wasn't getting dwarfed which proved my point

regmac

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #103 on: October 02, 2009, 12:28:35 PM »
Ronnie lacked the conditioning to compete with Cutler '09. Cutler was dier and bigger than Ronnie ever was.
He DID in 2003     bigger    MUCH BIGGER
((-::

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #104 on: October 02, 2009, 12:30:27 PM »
How heavy was Jay? He seemed to be as big as Ronnie was, in the 2003 Mr Olympia (where he was 287).

And yes, I think a prime Ronnie and a prime Dorian would both have trouble with the 09 version of Jay. He was massive, conditioned and dry.
:-\
choice is an illusion

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #105 on: October 02, 2009, 01:53:43 PM »
Quote
And yes, I think a prime Ronnie and a prime Dorian would both have trouble with the 09 version of Jay. He was massive, conditioned and dry.

and yet had an entire back about 30 levels below either of them...

 ::)

you forget this..

and jays pecs and arms are smooth as can be. not to mention the thick waist, missing abs etc.

its not even close in any sense of the word...
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #106 on: October 02, 2009, 02:01:49 PM »
and yet had an entire back about 30 levels below either of them...

 ::)

you forget this..

and jays pecs and arms are smooth as can be. not to mention the thick waist, missing abs etc.

its not even close in any sense of the word...

Destroys both of them BY FAR


Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #107 on: October 02, 2009, 02:08:56 PM »
uh. no.

he destroys jay. not ronnie.

although dorian, like Jay, has nice wrinkles on his back.. :'(

part of why Ronnie is far ahead of both of them ..
Flower Boy Ran Away

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #108 on: October 02, 2009, 02:14:40 PM »
BOOOOOOOOOOOM
GAME OVER

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #109 on: October 02, 2009, 02:14:46 PM »
uh. no.

he destroys jay. not ronnie.

BY FAR he's much bigger than Ronnie 244 V 269 more complete better balanced and thicker NO CONTEST

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #110 on: October 02, 2009, 02:17:02 PM »
um. that dorian shot at 269 is not in contest shape.

the only time dorian competed at 269 was here, looking like dogshit:
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #111 on: October 02, 2009, 02:18:16 PM »
uh. no.

he destroys jay. not ronnie.

although dorian, like Jay, has nice wrinkles on his back.. :'(

part of why Ronnie is far ahead of both of them ..

Jay NO CONTEST from either in density & dryness Yates stands alone as well as balance & proportion



kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #112 on: October 02, 2009, 02:19:29 PM »
um. that dorian shot at 269 is not in contest shape.

the only time dorian competed at 269 was here, looking like dogshit:
Nasser is owning these two there.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #113 on: October 02, 2009, 02:21:17 PM »
um. that dorian shot at 269 is not in contest shape.

the only time dorian competed at 269 was here, looking like dogshit:

LMFAO he's not in contest shape let me translate he kills anything Ronnie has to offer

who cares if he didn't show up in contest like that

nice diversionary tactic to escape Yates domination


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #114 on: October 02, 2009, 02:22:11 PM »
Nasser is owning these two there.

That particular pose that particular year absolutely .

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #115 on: October 02, 2009, 02:22:50 PM »
LMFAO he's not in contest shape let me translate he kills anything Ronnie has to offer

who cares if he didn't show up in contest like that

nice diversionary tactic to escape Yates domination



Looks nearly as dry and conditioned there as Ronnie was in 98

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #116 on: October 02, 2009, 02:26:41 PM »
Looks nearly as dry and conditioned there as Ronnie was in 98

Yeah with 20 more pounds of muscle and a hell of a lot better balance & proportion , this pose kills ANYTHING Ronnie has ever show any weight any year



kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #117 on: October 02, 2009, 02:28:24 PM »
:-\

I'm not saying Jay would win over them outright. In the 2004 Mr Olympia, Ronnie was at his biggest / heaviest (296 lb) and Jay still beat him in the abs n thigh pose in the challenge round. And Jay was just as big as Ronnie in the rear lat spread and front double bi. The 2009 Mr Olympia version of Jay is bigger and better than the 04 version of Jay, which is why I'm saying even a prime Ronnie wouldn't be able to beat Jay too easily.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #118 on: October 02, 2009, 02:38:03 PM »
I'm not saying Jay would win over them outright. In the 2004 Mr Olympia, Ronnie was at his biggest / heaviest (296 lb) and Jay still beat him in the abs n thigh pose in the challenge round. And Jay was just as big as Ronnie in the rear lat spread and front double bi. The 2009 Mr Olympia version of Jay is bigger and better than the 04 version of Jay, which is why I'm saying even a prime Ronnie wouldn't be able to beat Jay too easily.

You're one of the smartest posters on this board these guys can't look past their preferences and biases to see while Jay might not beat Ronnie he would surely give him a a hell of a fight , to mention even them in the same breathe is sacrilege  ::) and they're so comfortable in their ignorance they all agree with each other as it was an afterthought and the more pronounced the rejection the more correct they think they are , they say " ignorance is bliss " these guys must be in heaven 

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #119 on: October 02, 2009, 02:39:47 PM »
so, you whole argument rests on the fact that in 2001 Jay pushed ronnie in one of his worst ever physique presenations? ::)

and therefore 09 jay would push a peak ronnie even though a peak ronnie compared to 2001 Ronnie was like night and day? ::)

god damn your dumb.. :-\

have fun with the flowers today..

hahahahahaha so much for your University  ;)

epic backfire stupid  ;D

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #120 on: October 02, 2009, 03:07:44 PM »
Nasser is owning these two there.

what else is new?

dorian was nothing special from the front..
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #121 on: October 02, 2009, 03:33:31 PM »
what else is new?

dorian was nothing special from the front..

yeah sure he wasn't because contests are judged from all angles hahahahahahahaha idiot brush up on your grammar dumb ass

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #122 on: October 02, 2009, 03:41:07 PM »
Ronnied had all those gross lines in his muscles, and his different muscle groups all looked like they were separate from each other. Jay figured out a way to keep the lines out of the muscles and develop the spaces between muscles so they all looked like one big muscle.

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #123 on: October 02, 2009, 03:43:48 PM »
yeah sure he wasn't because contests are judged from all angles hahahahahahahaha idiot brush up on your grammar dumb ass

Nice run on sentence.  ::)

Corecting someones grammar on the internet is the whore of those who have nothing original to say.  If you have to resort to such comments you aren't making your side of the argument any stronger.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79940
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman at His Best Couldn't Beat Cutler '09
« Reply #124 on: October 02, 2009, 03:55:09 PM »
Nice run on sentence.  ::)

Corecting someones grammar on the internet is the whore of those who have nothing original to say.  If you have to resort to such comments you aren't making your side of the argument any stronger.

Correcting  ;)

my argument is ironclad and I'm pointing out whilst he's questioning someone's intelligence he should make sure he spells correctly while doing or he runs the risk of looking like an idiot himself