hmm. lets see, in 35 years since we saw peak arnold cutler has added significant extra weight to his midsection, thighs and glutes, wow!
he has managed however inferior detail overall, less vascularity and is totally void of lower back detail. his christmas tree development is nowhere to be seenand no prominent spinal erectors either. Arnolds snaked out like two cables! Jays back muscularity seems to stop half way down in the rear double biceps. He should have this and then some!
Arnold had a bigger frame that didnt need oversized delts for width not that his were small by a long shot. he also had a much thicker chest, bigger rib cage and small waist perhaps gentically wide(ish) from the front but overall tiny. His muscle tie ins were superior and his physique flowed from top to bottom.
At peak he also didnt have weak thighs, they were large, plenty big and deeply etched. ok he didnt have hamstrings sliced to bits but no one did back then, not much progression when his back is nowhere near as defined.
even stood next to each other with arnold in a snug fitting suit you can tell if Arnold had his peak physique and size cutler would not look particularly big next to him atall.
