Author Topic: Rooting Against America: Nobel Peace Prize Edition (Read 8151 times)

Kazan · « **Reply #25 on:** October 09, 2009, 02:03:27 PM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 09, 2009, 01:57:31 PM

i said simple people would be able to understand it, i didn't say anything about morons like yourself

The Showstoppa · « **Reply #26 on:** October 09, 2009, 02:09:00 PM »

Blackone stirring the shit.....his favorite color.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #27 on:** October 09, 2009, 02:30:55 PM »

Quote from: big_mal on October 09, 2009, 01:17:39 PM

these muthafuckas on this board would hate the man if he found the cure for cancer...

that's honestly the impression I get from them too.

The Showstoppa · « **Reply #28 on:** October 09, 2009, 02:35:41 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on October 09, 2009, 02:30:55 PM

that's honestly the impression I get from them too.

It offsets the motherfuckers who would still love him if they heard he caused cancer.

blacken700 · « **Reply #29 on:** October 09, 2009, 02:44:15 PM »

the official explanation on why he won

240 is Back · « **Reply #30 on:** October 09, 2009, 03:01:51 PM »

Quote from: Hedgehog on October 09, 2009, 01:33:05 PM

Obama hasn't done anything to deserve the Prize.

But it's just weird when his fellow countrymen attack him for it.

x 2

Just like the republicans who are high-fiving and cheering for Rio now.

blacken700 · « **Reply #31 on:** October 09, 2009, 03:07:18 PM »

President Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday in a stunning decision designed to build momentum behind his initiatives to reduce nuclear arms, ease tensions with the Muslim world and stress diplomacy and cooperation rather than unilateralism

a_joker10 · « **Reply #32 on:** October 09, 2009, 03:27:30 PM »

Again I don't think its a personal attack on him as much as its people sick of the extreme activism by organizations like the Nobel organization or the Academy of Motion Pictures.

Look, they changed the rules to allow Gore to win 2007, then they explicitly state this to help Obama gain momentum.
Its not award then, but a statement of support.

I really don't think this helps or hurts Obama, but really lessen the prestige of the peace prize.

Regardless both Nevil Chamberlain and Carter won the prize.
While Ghandi never did.

Peace my ass.

Skip8282 · « **Reply #33 on:** October 09, 2009, 03:54:36 PM »

Quote from: big_mal on October 09, 2009, 01:17:39 PM

these muthafuckas on this board would hate the man if he found the cure for cancer...

Oh please. I said in 240's thread when he posted that Obama was giving the money to charity that it was very noble of him. As a person, I'm sure he's a great guy, and giving away $1.4 million is a real testament to character. But he didn't earn this award, he beat out people who are truly deserving and giving an award like this to somebody for what they say they want to do is...well...you really can't see a problem with that?

tonymctones · « **Reply #34 on:** October 09, 2009, 04:00:39 PM »

Quote from: a_joker10 on October 09, 2009, 03:27:30 PM

Again I don't think its a personal attack on him as much as its people sick of the extreme activism by organizations like the Nobel organization or the Academy of Motion Pictures.

Look, they changed the rules to allow Gore to win 2007, then they explicitly state this to help Obama gain momentum.
Its not award then, but a statement of support.

I really don't think this helps or hurts Obama, but really lessen the prestige of the peace prize.

Regardless both Nevil Chamberlain and Carter won the prize.
While Ghandi never did.

Peace my ass.

thats exactly right, what the ppl ok with this seem to not realize is HE DOESNT DESERVE IT this is simply a political bull shit move

he would have gotten more respect from ppl here in america and all over the world if he would have politely declined and explained that if and when he is awarded one in the future he wants it to be on his merits...

obviously he doesnt have the merits as of right now.

240 is Back · « **Reply #35 on:** October 09, 2009, 04:10:43 PM »

Does anyone here believe Rush and others wouldn't be complaining today - if obama had declined the award?

I think they'd complain about that too.

tonymctones · « **Reply #36 on:** October 09, 2009, 04:15:05 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on October 09, 2009, 04:10:43 PM

Does anyone here believe Rush and others wouldn't be complaining today - if obama had declined the award?

I think they'd complain about that too.

anybody here think the you and youre lib buddies would be happy if bush had won the award?

hes done more then obama has

Kazan · « **Reply #37 on:** October 09, 2009, 04:17:25 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on October 09, 2009, 04:10:43 PM

Does anyone here believe Rush and others wouldn't be complaining today - if obama had declined the award?

I think they'd complain about that too.

I don't care what Rush says, what don't you get about that? He's an entertainer plain and simple.

240 is Back · « **Reply #38 on:** October 09, 2009, 04:19:14 PM »

Quote from: Kazan on October 09, 2009, 04:17:25 PM

I don't care what Rush says, what don't you get about that? He's an entertainer plain and simple.

I didn't say you did. But a lot of repubs do.

Kazan · « **Reply #39 on:** October 09, 2009, 04:22:43 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on October 09, 2009, 04:19:14 PM

I didn't say you did. But a lot of repubs do.

There is a big difference between being a conservative and republican, I voted 3rd party in the last election, because as a conservative Obama and McCain represent everything that I am against with every fibre of my being.

tonymctones · « **Reply #40 on:** October 09, 2009, 04:34:05 PM »

Quote from: tonymctones on October 09, 2009, 04:15:05 PM

anybody here think the you and youre lib buddies would be happy if bush had won the award?

hes done more then obama has

bump for an answer from the libs(240)

tonymctones · « **Reply #41 on:** October 09, 2009, 05:25:42 PM »

Quote from: tonymctones on October 09, 2009, 04:15:05 PM

anybody here think the you and youre lib buddies would be happy if bush had won the award?

hes done more then obama has

bump for an answer from anybody with a problem with ppl thinking obama shouldnt have won this award...

Eric15210 · « **Reply #42 on:** October 09, 2009, 05:37:01 PM »

they should rename it bashing bush award

tonymctones · « **Reply #43 on:** October 09, 2009, 05:40:05 PM »

Quote from: Eric15210 on October 09, 2009, 05:37:01 PM

they should rename it bashing bush award

hahahhahaaa

2ND COMING · « **Reply #44 on:** October 09, 2009, 05:40:36 PM »

Quote from: tonymctones on October 09, 2009, 05:25:42 PM

bump for an answer from anybody with a problem with ppl thinking obama shouldnt have won this award...

when during his term?

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #45 on:** October 09, 2009, 05:42:00 PM »

Quote from: tonymctones on October 09, 2009, 04:34:05 PM

bump for an answer from the libs(240)

i'm not happy obama got it and hell no i wouldn't have been happy if bush got it. that would be an even bigger WTF...

my appraisal is honest. guys like rush/3333/glenn, it's just a routine forgone conclusion that would be the same today as at it would be years down the road even if he did earn it.

tonymctones · « **Reply #46 on:** October 09, 2009, 05:43:59 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on October 09, 2009, 05:42:00 PM

i'm not happy obama got it and hell no i wouldn't have been happy if bush got it. that would be an even bigger WTF...

so youre ok with ppl in america being turned off by this obvious political move and disgrace?

just trying to understand b/c alot of ppl are coming on here condemning ppl who are against this but youre the only one who has answered whether or not they would be ok with bush winning it.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #47 on:** October 09, 2009, 05:47:08 PM »

Quote from: tonymctones on October 09, 2009, 05:43:59 PM

so youre ok with ppl in america being turned off by this obvious political move and disgrace?

just trying to understand b/c alot of ppl are coming on here condemning ppl who are against this but youre the only one who has answered whether or not they would be ok with bush winning it.

I don't understand wth you're asking... read the rest of my post above.

tonymctones · « **Reply #48 on:** October 09, 2009, 05:56:26 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on October 09, 2009, 05:47:08 PM

I don't understand wth you're asking... read the rest of my post above.

lol well you added some after i quoted it...

I agree and disagree but it would have been the same with bush too...

bush did tons for african countries and their fight with aids bro he could have deservedly been nominated and won.

I agree there will be ppl that bitch just to bitch but this isnt a case call them out when its a case

this issue deserves the eye rolls as the stupidity is off the fuking charts

like I said you have ppl on here who dont understand why ppl are upset even americans are upset with this stupidity, fuking really?

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #49 on:** October 09, 2009, 07:05:26 PM »

Quote from: tonymctones on October 09, 2009, 05:56:26 PM

lol well you added some after i quoted it...

I agree and disagree but it would have been the same with bush too...

bush did tons for african countries and their fight with aids bro he could have deservedly been nominated and won.

I agree there will be ppl that bitch just to bitch but this isnt a case call them out when its a case

this issue deserves the eye rolls as the stupidity is off the fuking charts

like I said you have ppl on here who dont understand why ppl are upset even americans are upset with this stupidity, fuking really?

wait, this all depends. If we're saying "what if Bush got the prize at 9 months into his first term with nothing to show for it" It's at least equally absurd. If Bush got this prize after knowing the fruits of this full presidency, I'm going to call it way more absurd. What the hell is your point? I'm still not getting it.