Thanks for bumping this 33. This is further confirmation that the man is a socialist. Not sure it shows he "hates" the Constitution. He thinks the fact it doesn't require redistribution of wealth is a "flaw." Does not surprise me that he thinks this way. That is essentially how he is governing.
Does he "hate" the constitution? I think the answer is he probably does. He's been quoted several times saying the constitution is merely a document of negative liberties and doesn't really clarify what the government can do, which is absurd. The constitution specifically grants and specifies certain powers to the federal government and again, specifically states "all powers" not granted to the federal government within the document are reserved for the states.
I also believe that both the constitution and declaration of independence are both very specific when it comes to things like the redistribution of wealth. No, neither document uses those words "redistribution of wealth" specifically, but the specifics of the rights of man in regards to "his" property is very specific and quite to the point. I've said before that much of our founding documents are based on many of the ideas of John Locke, Locke believed that property, meaning, wealth, land, the production of your labor was a protected value belonging unto each man according to what God had blessed him with and that no man had any right to take away from one for which God had blessed him with.
As he so often does, Jefferson said it best:
"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."
"Nothing is unchangeable but the inherent and unalienable rights of man."
