Thanks for posting this!Before I had some doubts,but now I don't-there a some biased judges in the judging panel.If that judge and others like him judged every year,no wonder why Dorian won in 97 with a perfect score.Shawn was right to ask for rotation of the judges every year.
So a small muscle group like calves is more important than a big one like quads?Kevin and Shawn had better quads and hams,but because Dorian's calves were better his legs were better from top to bottom?And the reasoning for that is that they had "better proportion".And who said his legs had the right proportions?It's a subjective opinion!Show me a written IFBB statement with the right proportions between thighs and calves in inches or centimetres!You can't,because it does not exist!I wonder if Dorian's legs were perfectly proportioned,how his calves would look like if he ever was able to build a thighs like Ronnie,Kai,Jay or Branch and to keep his "perfect" proportions at the same time...
It's interesting how according to Dorian's fans when he has an extremely developed group like back it does not overpower his weak upperarms and is a good thing,but when he has an underdeveloped group like quads it's again good for him,because it's in a good proportion with his calves and the others who had great quads were out of proportion.lol
Here are some shots showing dorians "best legs"and "best MM pose"...
Thanks for posting this!Before I had some doubts,but now I don't-there a some biased judges in the judging panel.If that judge and others like him judged every year,no wonder why Dorian won in 97 with a perfect score.Shawn was right to ask for rotation of the judges every year.
Biased you say that like it's a bad thing , yes the judges are biased for the physique that best fits the judging criteria. And Dorian could lose a few poses and still win with a perfect score because they judges toss out the high & low scores try learning how contests are judged and then you wont be scratching your head. And Shawn wanted a rotation of judges because be thought this would favor his physique style , in other words he wanted the rules to bend for him
So a small muscle group like calves is more important than a big one like quads?Kevin and Shawn had better quads and hams,but because Dorian's calves were better his legs were better from top to bottom?And the reasoning for that is that they had "better proportion".And who said his legs had the right proportions?It's a subjective opinion!Show me a written IFBB statement with the right proportions between thighs and calves in inches or centimetres!You can't,because it does not exist!I wonder if Dorian's legs were perfectly proportioned,how his calves would look like if he ever was able to build a thighs like Ronnie,Kai,Jay or Branch and to keep his "perfect" proportions at the same time...
No muscle group of more important than the other but you're harping on one whilst ignoring others once again NOT how it works. And I love how you just type Kevin & Shawn have better quads & hams and offer up NO explanation what so ever , they're better just because you typed they are lmao
The only ' problem ' with Dorian's quads was the separation of the rectus femoris his quads other than that were fine and his hamstrings were great they're thick and fully developed and overall Dorian's legs were better than Kevin & Shawn because he didn't have short legs like them and he had proportionate calves
And who said he has better proportion in his legs? I did how did I come to this conclusion? because Dorian's legs aren't short , his calves aren't high and lack proportion in relation to the quads , and his hamstrings are fully developed and in proportion with his quads , which you can tell when a competitor is in profile and the IFBB judge backs up my point which is why he claims Dorian had the best LEGS in 1994
It's interesting how according to Dorian's fans when he has an extremely developed group like back it does not overpower his weak upperarms and is a good thing,but when he has an underdeveloped group like quads it's again good for him,because it's in a good proportion with his calves and the others who had great quads were out of proportion.lol
Here are some shots showing dorians "best legs"and "best MM pose"...
Look no one is in perfect proportion ( well Steve Reeves was ) but Dorian has less flaws than his contemporaries , what you ignorantly forget what is judged is clavicle width , height , leg length , arm length torso length and the proportion between them all , back width , etc you can harp one Dorians biceps all you want and I can find flaws on Shawn & Kevin but when all is said and done , when everything is judged Dorian is the clear winner , density , dryness , muscular bulk , balance , proportion , posing , presentation , etc
And I love ignorant internet-fan-boys who sit at home on their computers telling the IFBB judges who were live and in person they're wrong and you are right LMFAO
Go learn how contests are judged and then come back I'll let you know if you learned anything.
