http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nephilim
Plus, all paths do not lead to the same . If a man chooses evil and another chooses good, their path's will not end in the same...if so then there would be no such thing as Good or Evil. A man who taks himself onto a path of enlightenment will end in another place than one who does not.
Also, if you are hungry and choose not to eat, you will be more hungry, if you choose to eat, then you will not be hungry---two different paths.
Good and evil are constructs of Christianity.
There is no good and evil. Any morals based in Abrahamic religions have outlasted their usefulness.
We should seek to frame our morals based on what is good for the individual. This is not as scary as it sounds.
Often what is good for the individual is social cohesion. This is the essence of real Karma.
Be a good neighbour, and people will be good back to you.
It is selfless, selfishness--a reconciliation of opposites.
Why is it selfish to be a good neighbour? Because you are looking out for your own good.
If you went around killing everyone at a whim, society will eliminate you--thus most people won't do it.
That is what I meant before when I spoke of nature's checks and balances. Nature accounts for the few sociopaths,
by not allowing too many of them to exist. Those few that do are eventually purged.
And most people have a natural empathy for their fellow man; this is also an important tool for social cohesion.
They might cause a little change to the reality around them; however, ultimately they will be subsumed by the mass.
This applies to anything that deviates from the path. Rebellion is an allusion; morals are relative.
In some societies it is perfectly moral to eat other people. Why? Because again, what is good for the individual and social cohesion is moral--
and this can change.
