Author Topic: Nassergate (Read 15332 times)

the_swami · « **Reply #25 on:** December 16, 2009, 10:22:28 PM »

great article from one of the best with one of the best chest developments in the history of BB

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #26 on:** December 17, 2009, 01:56:55 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on December 16, 2009, 08:22:01 PM

i agree that nasser was better in 95 and especially 96 than 97 but you are wrong to say he carried more mass in 97 than 96!!.. in 96 he was more than 280 pounds while in 97 he was 270!!..

and what about his front lowerbody? his quads were clearly better than dorian's from the front and also from the side.. his hams too were bigger and more separated.. beside back dorian had him only in calves, both had great calves but imo dorian's can be considered the best calves ever!..

I believe you on the weight difference between '96 and '97, you seem to know your shit. He was bigger overall than Dorian and had good detail on his quads and hams too but separation is not the only thing: as Nasser got bigger he lost a part of his conditioning mainly the density on which Dorian had him everytime. That also comes into this equation. And that translated clearly on all back poses where he actually even lost separation. And you know it, since Hany, back wins Os.

nolotil · « **Reply #27 on:** December 17, 2009, 03:42:43 AM »

Quote from: MORTALCOIL on December 17, 2009, 01:56:55 AM

I believe you on the weight difference between '96 and '97, you seem to know your shit. He was bigger overall than Dorian and had good detail on his quads and hams too but separation is not the only thing: as Nasser got bigger he lost a part of his conditioning mainly the density on which Dorian had him everytime. That also comes into this equation. And that translated clearly on all back poses where he actually even lost separation. And you know it, since Hany, back wins Os.

yes, but thats not right in my opinion...and should change. specially as nasser had a plenty big back. i often see that kind of argumentation, 'thats how it is'...my answer they should change how it is. if the best bodybuilder on stage isnt allowed to win then they should change the criteria, because they are flawed.

nolotil · « **Reply #28 on:** December 17, 2009, 03:43:56 AM »

some official nassergate music

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #29 on:** December 17, 2009, 04:18:50 AM »

Quote from: nolotil on December 17, 2009, 03:42:43 AM

yes, but thats not right in my opinion...and should change. specially as nasser had a plenty big back. i often see that kind of argumentation, 'thats how it is'...my answer they should change how it is. if the best bodybuilder on stage isnt allowed to win then they should change the criteria, because they are flawed.

So you think that they should't be judged on their muscular quality but only quantity? Considering that Pro Bbers use tons of ergogenics off all sorts, it's not that hard for them to put on mass and to get ripped even. What stays as the only valid criteria of some sort of effort in fact is the muscular density which is not obtainable without a certain training intensity. So I actually think that that criterai should prevail. And that's why Yates preaviled so many times. He LIFTED weights, pushed himself to the limit and it showed at the end of the day.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #30 on:** December 17, 2009, 04:30:41 AM »

Quote from: MORTALCOIL on December 17, 2009, 01:56:55 AM

I believe you on the weight difference between '96 and '97, you seem to know your shit. He was bigger overall than Dorian and had good detail on his quads and hams too but separation is not the only thing: as Nasser got bigger he lost a part of his conditioning mainly the density on which Dorian had him everytime. That also comes into this equation. And that translated clearly on all back poses where he actually even lost separation. And you know it, since Hany, back wins Os.

yes always soft and brown

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #31 on:** December 17, 2009, 04:34:04 AM »

Too much information, my friend, way too much. Nasser might give you some diet advices maybe.

NaturalWonder83 · « **Reply #32 on:** December 17, 2009, 05:31:27 AM »

nassergate 4ever in our hearts and in our minds

jaejonna · « **Reply #33 on:** December 17, 2009, 06:52:40 AM »

Nassar=legend

Azn Muscle · « **Reply #34 on:** December 17, 2009, 07:43:30 AM »

Great article from the uncrowned (3x at least) Mr. Olympia.

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #35 on:** December 17, 2009, 04:49:47 PM »

How long does it take Nasser to write a book? Is he having trouble with typing?

the_swami · « **Reply #36 on:** December 17, 2009, 05:20:46 PM »

I believe NAsser and co author david robson have both been working very hard on the book.

there is a TONNE of material and it is, i believve, near the finsihing stages.

mossel · « **Reply #37 on:** December 17, 2009, 11:50:10 PM »

Does nasser visit Titus on a regular base?

Tyr · « **Reply #38 on:** December 18, 2009, 12:04:10 AM »

Quote from: the_swami on December 17, 2009, 05:20:46 PM

I believe NAsser and co author david robson have both been working very hard on the book.

there is a TONNE of material and it is, i believve, near the finsihing stages.

It's been at the finishing stage for almost 3 years.

Nasser probably has a hard time focusing with one eye wobbling all over.
If he actually showed consistency he would have won more than just 6 competitions throughout his career.

nolotil · « **Reply #39 on:** December 18, 2009, 07:43:21 AM »

Quote from: NaturalWonder83 on December 17, 2009, 05:31:27 AM

nassergate 4ever in our hearts and in our minds

yes

dr.chimps · « **Reply #40 on:** December 18, 2009, 07:45:19 AM »

Nassergate!? Linking a now disgruntled BBer with one of the most egregious events in US politics!? Good work Team Nasser.

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #41 on:** December 18, 2009, 07:48:55 AM »

Quote from: dr.chimps on December 18, 2009, 07:45:19 AM

Nassergate!? Linking a now disgruntled BBer with one of the most egregious events in US politics!? Good work Team Nasser.

Word is Yates planted mics at Nasser's place to get training infos. Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman didn't get enough conclusive evidence this time but I hear they still can't sleep at night because of this.

Fatpanda · « **Reply #42 on:** December 18, 2009, 08:07:34 AM »

great thread by an impressive new getbigger nolotil.

nolotil you have impressed me greatly since your arrival at getbig. Short though your stay has been i predict a great getbig future. You're are a thinker - i like that.

don't know about that name though

it doesn't exactly roll off the tongue

dr.chimps · « **Reply #43 on:** December 18, 2009, 10:36:21 AM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on December 18, 2009, 08:07:34 AM

great thread by an impressive new getbigger nolotil.

nolotil you have impressed me greatly since your arrival at getbig. Short though your stay has been i predict a great getbig future. You're are a thinker - i like that.

don't know about that name though it doesn't exactly roll off the tongue

Give it time, FP. Give it time. I'm sure you'll be a pro in no time.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #44 on:** December 18, 2009, 10:43:09 AM »

Quote from: dr.chimps on December 18, 2009, 10:36:21 AM

Give it time, FP. Give it time. I'm sure you'll be a pro in no time.

i believe you that you are really bothered with nasser threads and this is why we dont see you a lot in them

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #45 on:** December 18, 2009, 03:27:29 PM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on December 18, 2009, 10:43:09 AM

i believe you that you are really bothered with nasser threads and this is why we dont see you a lot in them

Have you cleaned the roof gym lately? Last I saw plates and such needed picking up.

nolotil · « **Reply #46 on:** December 18, 2009, 03:43:56 PM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on December 18, 2009, 08:07:34 AM

great thread by an impressive new getbigger nolotil.

nolotil you have impressed me greatly since your arrival at getbig. Short though your stay has been i predict a great getbig future. You're are a thinker - i like that.

don't know about that name though it doesn't exactly roll off the tongue

thank you panda

bic_staedtler · « **Reply #47 on:** December 18, 2009, 03:49:17 PM »

Of all the wannabe-neverwere-doesntevenmatteranymores, why would you choose Nasser upon which to hoist your homosexual desires? I mean, why not...I dunno, Tom Platz?

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #48 on:** December 18, 2009, 06:12:10 PM »

The important thing to remember is Nasser is a cock

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #49 on:** December 19, 2009, 12:29:04 AM »

Quote from: Mr Nobody on December 18, 2009, 03:27:29 PM

Have you cleaned the roof gym lately? Last I saw plates and such needed picking up.

seriously i am thinking to enlarge it to be 30 m2 instead of 15 m2.. your grandpa is so huge and needs more space to move in